SmallRig has launched an LP-E6NH battery for Canon cameras. This new battery has some improvements over Canon's OEM offerings. SmallRig's battery 2400mah capacity, which is a bit more than Canon's 2130mah. There is also a USB-C port on the battery for charging, which is a pretty nice feature. When using 5v 2.2A charging, the battery is fully charged in 2.5 hours using a USB-C cable.
These batteries are also fully compatible with dedicated battery chargers from Canon or third-parties.
The new SmallRig battery features frosted ABS and PC shell, which is fire-resistant and durable. The battery is also slightly lighter than Canon at 105g, compared to 113g.
The best part for most people? The $39.99 USD price tag. Currently, the Canon LP-E6NH is $79 USD.
SmallRig LP-E6NH Key Features
- USB-C charging port supports power bank, power strip, car charger, or other special chargers
- Pioneering high-current charging (5V 2.2A) makes the battery fully charged in 2.5 hours
- 2400mAh nominal capacity for longer run time
- Visually distinctive color
- Fully decoded, wide compatibility, no pop-ups
- Quality battery cell, with a safe and reliable circuit for stable voltage and current output
- Battery Weight: 105g (Canon OEM 113g)
First shipments of the new battery will begin on July 30, 2023, and for now, only to the USA.
Check out the SmallRig LP-E6NH $39
How about a fully decoded LP-E17?
I've using their LP-E6NH in my R6 for some time now and cannot find any difference between those and the original Canon battery. The Patona LP-E6NH have a nominally higher capacity of 2250 mAh compared to the 2130 mAH of the original, but I have not done any 'scientific' tests comparing run times.
Edit: Here in Germany Amazon offers a double pack Patona LP-E6NH for €66,90
[TEST] Patona LP-E6NH vs Canon LP-E6NH and multi battery charger
?!?!? Are you sure? That's frankly impossible, the difference between E6, E6N and E6NH is just the mAh, the capacity/duration. I don't see any way in which the EOS R is not compatible with the new batteries.
The thing is some advanced functions of the new cameras cannot be carried out by old batteries because they won't provide enough peak power; but compatibility for normal use is always guaranteed in cameras with batteries of the same "family".
-Brian
I ordered a couple of these just now to add to our ongoing LP-E6 variant review (https://camnostic.com/2021/02/powering-the-eos-r5/). In terms of getting Green H+, it's very likely that these will achieve that. The question is for how long.
Canon's OEM batteries typically keep the green H+ capacity all the way through about 65 percent of battery use. We tested a couple dozen of them, and it was pretty consistent. Of the four non-Canon LP-e6NH batteries (those not reporting as NH cannot do green H+), they average about 25 percent of battery use before the green H+ capacity goes away. Interestingly, if you had a third party battery and a Canon battery in a battery grip together, green H+ would be available using both batteries all the way down to the level at which Canon's crapped out.
Canon Germany only has the LP-E6 and LP-E6N listed for the R, so does Amazon.de...
They probably don't list the LP-E6NH because people will complain it can't be charged in the camera.