Review - Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II
jrista said:TexPhoto said:In general 300mm and 400mm f2.8s are for sports first, wildlife 2nd.
500, 600, 800 are for wildlife first, and sports/other applications 2nd.
I have a 400mm f2.8 IS (the first one) and a 300mm f4, plus both vIII extenders. This gets me a wide range of telephoto options, from 300mm to 1280 (equiv. on the 7D)
The 600mm f4 II looks astonishing, but waaaay past my budjet.
I actually like the 300/2.8 II for wildlife, especially deer and other ungulates. During this time of year especially, the males seem pretty docile. With as little as tan pants and a tan/light greenish camo shirt, they seem fearless enough to let me get well within 300mm range...even as close as 100mm range for a head shot. The weight and balance of the 300mm is a lot better, IMO, for your average walk-around wildlife photography than the 600mm (not that the 600mm isn't a great lens for that as well when you have more stationary or dangerous wildlife subjects.)
I agree, and you can stalk football players, baseball players, track and field athletes as well. You don't even have to worry about camo.
Upvote
0




