Hector1970 said:

Overall the 1DX III updates have been poor in terms of any real improvements .

Click to expand...

Sure. Canon would rather you buy the R3. Then the R1.

Upgraded to 1.0.3.1 this evening. Will go out tomorrow if it doesn't rain. While I am not a Netfix content creator, the bump in DR when shooting cLog3 in XF-AVC and mp4 is welcome. I mentioned elsewhere that the certification was the "silver lining" of this update.

danfaz said:

I was trying to find the article I read, but can't. However, my understanding is that Canon keeps making lenses until they are officially discontinued.

Click to expand...

They go to "Final Sale" status until supply runs out and then the status changes to "Discontinued".
However, you are correct in that internally "Final Sale" is discontinued.

Chaitanya said:

Canon has been quite generous with recall period.

Click to expand...

The camera was released in July 2022 so it's well within the most minimal of period warranties of 1 year. If it's a manufacturing fault, then in the EU, the manufacturer is responsible for 6 years. It's their legal obligation everywhere to fix it.

Pixel shift is supposed to lock the IBIS in place before it starts shooting, if it shakes something is wrong. You can try removing the battery for an hour or so, but if it persists, I'd start looking at getting it repaired under warranty.

davidespinosa said:

Can you or @AlanF give a link ?
I tried searching for 10-15 minutes but didn't find it.
Thanks !

Click to expand...

Sorry - I wan't logged in for a few days! The search function here is ... quirky ... but it does work.

R5boy said:

R3 gets more love.

Click to expand...

A newer, significantly more expensive camera gets more features added. I’m shocked, simply shocked!

FWIW, the only thing I find useful about the R3 update is compatibility with the flash that I ordered long ago, that it will still be months before I actually receive.

Windsor, Ontario, 27 March 2023: Simmod Lens are today announcing a new global network of approved lens modding specialists who are qualified to install Simmod’s extensive range of replacement mounts, gears and rings. The network has been established to offer users the option of full service Simmod conversions for their lenses. From today, users can

See full article...

Canon could quite easily make cameras like the ZV series, The FX3, and FX30.
The question is whether they would or should.
The R8 still seems like a better vlogging camera than the ZV-E1 even though it lacks IBIS.
Although, the ZV-E1 does have some nice new features.
The R50 seems like a better camera than the ZV-E10 in pretty much every regard.
The R5 C and FX3 are very different cameras.
They are both good and bad at different things.
Canon has nothing like the FX30.

neuroanatomist said:

The RP and 6DII share the same sensor. The likely reason IQ would be better on the RP is because the mirrorless cameras use the image sensor for AF, while DSLRs do not. Did you perform AF microadjustment on you lenses when you shot with DSLRs? With shallow DoF (as you’d get at 200/2.8 with a close subject), a bit of front- or back-focus can be a big problem.

Click to expand...

No, I have several (more actually) bodies that I use rotationally. Be it Full Frame ( 5diii, 6d/6dii) for shallow depth of field, Crop (7d/7dii,80d/70d) to extend the reach. Smaller Crop (100d/200d) for lighter carry. Vintage DSLR,s (40d, 50d, 5dc, 1div) for their sensor interpretations.
More recently the M bodies and lastly the RP.
The thought of micro adjusting all for a single lens choice never appealed. Hence the arrival of the RP due in part of its full frame, EVF and AF off the sensor.
As much as I’m enjoying mirrorless I can’t give up my DSLR’s.
I adore the look of the files from the 1div. It’s currently paired with the sigma 30mm EX 1.4. The colours are just gorgeous and I cannot replicate with either the 24mm stm on crop or the 40mm on full frame both those lenses give the approximate view as the 1div/30mm combo.

Details of firmware changes​

This firmware includes the following functional improvements and modifications.

1. [IBIS high-resolution shooting] has been added to the menu. By utilizing the in-body image stabilization mechanism, it is now possible to record images with higher resolution.
   • ※
     To check the image, please use EOS Utility/Digital Photo Professional. EOS Utility/Digital Photo Professional needs to be upgraded.
2. Added [Save and read communication settings to card] to the menu. It is now possible to take over the network settings between cameras of the same model.
3. You can now trim and resize while transferring images to the FTP server.
4. Added "Image Protect" when transferring FTP to the menu. You can now automatically attach protection to images that have been transferred by FTP. This allows you to determine whether the image has been FTP transferred or not.
5. Fixed a minor bug.

Like with the new R3 1.4 update that was also released today no AF improvements from Canon R6 Mark II

salimedwardo said:

it's useful as I don't think I can update the firmware without a computer; all the same, I'd have loved the focus stacking ability from the newer models.

Click to expand...

You can update it through the Canon Connect app on your phone, or find a way to put the .FIR file on an SD card.

neuroanatomist said:

When a review starts out with a blatant error, I typically stop reading. Their second sentence:



No.

Click to expand...

But R8 does have a full frame 24Mp sensor. If you're referring to the fact the RP had a 26Mp sensor, I wouldn't call it a blatant error. The RP had a full frame sensor, and the number of megapixels in the RP doesn't really matter for that particular review.

Summary:
* Cameras cost money.
* Nobody else gonna buy you a camera.
(not the government, CEO, shareholders, copier division, or other customers)

Therefore:
You gonna have to buy you a camera.

Report from DPR:

cp-2023-canon-interview-it-s-our-mission-to-make-any-camera-system-easier-operate

On 3rd party lenses:

We often hear from readers who say they like Canon mirrorless cameras but want a wider selection of lenses, including third party options. How will Canon appeal to these users?​

Whenever a third party presents a request to us, we’ll consider it, based on our business strategy. In fact, we have been communicating with some outside companies, and you may already be aware that here at CP+, Cosina has announced that they will be creating RF lenses of their own.

On the M series:

What do APS-C cameras in RF-mount mean for the future of the EF-M system?​

The concept of the R50 is to be compact and light. If we look at the M system, the mount itself is small, therefore the structure is even smaller and lighter.

There are customers who wish to have their camera smaller and lighter, and that demand is still strong. As long as these demands persist in the market, we will continue to support and intend to continue the M system.

glongstaff said:

Shoot in Latvia

View attachment 207069

Click to expand...

I love the use of the sunglasses in addition to black and white here. The frames of the glasses really pop!
-Caia
Wedding Photographer Nashville

JustUs7 said:

I finally succumbed to the gas. Received my R6II yesterday. Just in time to experiment a bit before Spring Break to the Smoky Mountains. Have yet to click the shutter. Work is too busy. Feels much more substantial than my RP. The BBF is a bit more of a thumb stretch. I got a decent deal for a brand new unit through Canon Price Watch and their street price.

Click to expand...

I've always switched the function of the 'AF-ON' button and the 'AE-L' [*] button on all of my Canon bodies that have both so that the thumb stretch to use back button AF is less.

Well, I suppose they've been working on the RF mount probably for years now, so I'd say yes.

AndyFranklin said:

It's part of a sculpture that I don't remember the name. It had this multitude of wires that created these patterns.

Click to expand...

Thanks for solving that riddle for me

becceric said:

I decided to return to the car for the 100-400 and enjoy the snow covered trees.

Click to expand...

Twas a good idea

Graeme said:

Title says it all really. R7 is a good seller so makes sense to maintain that momentum with some solid firmware support.

Click to expand...

The R5 is almost 3 years old and lacks many of the AF features that are included in more recently developed Canon cameras like the R7. So, the R5 firmware update will likely give the R5 the same AF features that the R7 already has. The R7 is 9 months old. What new features do you think Canon has developed in that time?

neuroanatomist said:

One of the great things about using the EF 11-24 on an R body is the drop-in filter adapter. To me, that’s more useful than an extra millimeter on the wide end.

Click to expand...

Absolutely, it’s almost essential for landscape use.

What is the actual question?

"Will Canon release a version of R5 scaled down in size for users with small hands, keeping its great UI otherwise intact?"
"Will Canon release a compact RF-mount camera with a 8K FF sensor, even with a worse viewfinder and control layout?"
"Will Canon release any compact RF-mount camera?"

The "Line Hinsch" is a museum and restaurant ship in Fishing Harbour
Haven't been there for dinner, so no recommendation

vjlex said:

Can't wait till this leaves the front page and makes my heart stop skipping a beat every time because I keep thinking it's about the R5...

Click to expand...

Yea, I keep hoping to see a firmware release for the R3 adding major things too.