• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

The Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM II Still Scheduled to Arrive This Year [CR3]

HTML:
We’re told that the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM II is still scheduled to arrive this year. Keep in mind lens announcements can be bumped pretty easily, which we saw recently with the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III. That lens was initially schedule to be announced in June.</p>
<p>We can confirm that this will be the first Canon lens with an LCD display built-in, however we’re still not sure what information will be present on the digital display.</p>
<p>The lens will be equipped with Nano-USM, the latest IS and will be heavier than the current model. Expect a big optical upgrade too we’re told.</p>
<p>There’s also a <a href="http://nokiS___a-camera.blogspot.ca/2016/08/2016827.html">buzz about another DSLR body coming</a>, dubbed DS126651, as seen at a Russian certification agency. We haven’t personally heard anything about another imminent camera body.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

60D won't recognize lenses after being in the rain

We got pretty wet today at the festival as it started to downpour and we had to walk back to the car. While I tried to keep my camera under my shirt, my shirt got soaked. The camera dried up on the drive home and a little while later at home I turned it on to find that the aperture is reading 00, can't change the aperture and it won't autofocus. At one point the camera don't me it wasn't connecting to the lens and to clean the contacts. Tried that. Same issue. I also tried another lens of mine that wasn't with me during the rain. Same issue.

One of my batteries also said it couldn't communicate with the camera but the other one I put in did.

Is my camera broke or is there something else I can do?

6D pricing - open box items

Most places seem to be selling new 6D at $1499 (Amazon, Adorama, BH ...). However at Adorama and BH I also see listing for "open box" items at $1269. Their description of "open box" is as follows:

Adorama: Packaging may show some wear and tear. Item includes all original accessories and full 1 year Canon USA warranty

BHPhoto: Minimal signs of wear on packaging only—item itself is in pristine condition and includes the full manufacturer's or B&H warranty.

I can't tell if camera is unused, unopened new or not. Any has experience with the open box item?

Thanks
Deepinder

PS: Refurbished 6D is out of stock on canon site.

Leaked info from Canon Ambassador - Canon EF 50 f/1.4L II USM?

Hi folks,

maybe there alredy is a topic about this, but I wanted to share.

I came across article on canon.sk (Canon Slovakia) and canon-europe.com. The article is an interview with Canon Ambassador Paolo Pellegrin about the new Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

Paolo shoots with a limited selection of prime lenses, favouring their image quality and fast apertures as well as the creativity that the restriction of a single focal length gives him. “My normal set up is 28mm, 35mm and 50mm primes,” he reveals. “I have the fast EF35mm f/1.4L II USM and EF50mm f/1.4L II USM versions of those two lenses, and I enjoy using the EF28mm f/2.8 II USM too, which is very small.”

Here is the link:
http://www.canon-europe.com/cameras/eos-5d-mark-iv/paolo-pellegrin/

I've also taken a screenshot and I'm adding it as attachement.

What do you think? Typo? Also a new 28 f/2.8II USM? Isn't the one with IS enough?

My toughts on EF 50 f/1.4L II USM
  • there is no EF 50 f/1.4L USM currently, so why Mark II? - that "L" is a typo
  • has Canon ever done something like "L treatment" with adding Mark II?

Regards

Attachments

  • Snímka.JPG
    Snímka.JPG
    56.4 KB · Views: 184

Canon EOS M5 Spotted at Russian Certification

HTML:
We <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/there-will-be-a-new-eos-m-camera-coming-in-2016/">believe that the next camera to be announced by Canon will be the EOS M5</a>, a mirrorless camera that will be a departure from what has come before it. It won’t be a full frame camera, but it will be slightly upmarket from the EOS M3. Alongside the camera will be a new EF-M 18-150mm lens.</p>
<p>From Novocert/NokiS___a (Google Translator)</p>
<p>PC2258</p>
<ul>
<li>SKU: 1279C002AA, 1279C012AA, 1279C022AA</li>
<li>Products: body lens kit lens kit 2</li>
<li>Color: one color</li>
<li>Bluetooth · Wi-Fi equipped (PDF document)</li>
<li>Mirror-less camera</li>
</ul>
<p>PC2279</p>
<ul>
<li>SKU: 1724C002AA, 1724C012AA, 1724C022AA, 1725C002AA, 1725C012AA, 1725C022AA</li>
<li>Products: body lens kit lens kit 2</li>
<li>Color: 2 colors</li>
<li>Mirror-less camera</li>
</ul>
<p>We hope to be able to publish more about the EOS M5 in the coming days.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Not specifocally Canon, but very well said about photos in general.

Don't know exactly where to share this:

http://petapixel.com/2012/01/10/this-photograph-is-not-free/

I've often made similar comments to folks that ask "Can we use this photo free?" ... OR, in the same vein, "Will you write us an article for free. We're a non-profit and don't have much PR money." Requests usually come from non-profits that have a mission (don't we all?) ... while the Director and staff all draw salaries ... but have no additional budget.

Long time 5D user, will I upgrade or wait for 6DII?

I’ve been using the 5D since the classic Mk1. In fact it was the first DSLR I owned coming from film days. I did use the 1DII prior but only hired.

For the first time I’m not placing a preorder for the MkIV. That’s not to say that the camera won’t end up in my kit because most likely it will.

There’s no doubt that so many things on the Mk4 will have been improved including things that I care about, dynamic range, high iso, focusing speed, expanded focusing points, colour, wifi, and 4K.

My only gripe is no flip screen (my personal preference and I don’t want to start another war). The 30.4mp is great for certain projects but for much of my work unnecessary and it will slow down my workflow. Sure, you can shoot at a lower resolution, but do you have to then advise your client that you’re not shooting at full resolution? For that reason, I can stick with the MkIII, then I am always shooting at full resolution 22mp.

I’ve been looking forward to 4K, more for personal projects than commercial ones - I have yet to be asked by a client for compulsory 4K, although I don’t doubt the time will come. Disclaimer: I shoot mostly stills.

So I guess, I’m interested to see who else like me hasn’t pre-ordered and why? And will you wait for the 6D?

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Manual Available

HTML:
<p>You can download the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV manual over at Canon Asia.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://support-sg.canon-asia.com/contents/SG/EN/0302497001.html">Get the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV manual</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Body

</strong><em>Shipping in early September, 2016</em></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>USA </strong><em>$3499</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1274705-REG/canon_eos_5d_mark_iv.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2bk6MtW">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICA5DM4.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/2bkM0ze">Canon Store</a> | <a href="http://mpex.com/canon-5d-mark-iv-dslr-camera-body-only.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a> **</li>
<li><strong>UK </strong><em>£3599</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://tidd.ly/aadf0b57">Park Cameras</a> | <strong>Germany </strong><em>€4065</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="https://ad.zanox.com/ppc/?39064896C77526565&ULP=[[https://www.calumetphoto.de/product/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-Gehause/CANEOS5DMIV]]">Calumet

</a></li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

The Superb Manfrotto 410 Geared Head

I would just like to say a big thank you to the forum members who advised I invest in a geared head. I picked up a barely used unit for roughly $200 equivalent.

What an incredibly engineered piece of equipment which is a major upgrade over the basic 3 way head I upgraded from. Once locked in, there is no play at all and the precision it offers is exactly what I needed to partner my T-SE 24mm and for my non bug macro work.

I highly recommend this unit to anybody who shoot frequently off of a tripod.

Thanks once again

  • Locked
Buddy with a T1i wants an EF-S superzoom...

Ugh, I can't stand large FL multiplier lenses, but a buddy of mine asked for advice for an 18-200, 18-270, etc. for his T1i for an upcoming trip. I tried to talk him into keeping his kit 18-55 and changing out for a 55- or 70- longer lens, but I think his mind's made up.

I don't follow EF-S superzooms at all. Help me out?

  • Best value in an EF-S 18-200+ lens?
  • Best performance in an EF-S 18-200+ lens?

EF is likely out for his budget, but he wants that wide end to go at least as wide as his current kit lens anyway. So EF-S it is.

Thx,
A

5DIV can only do 3 sec. continous shooting ?!

Quite surprised at the shallow RAW shooting ability of the 5DIV. Its single processor + CF slot can only push 21 full raw frames in one burst limiting continuous shooting time to 3 sec. Almost half of the 5DIII(!!).

Canon could have used a processorset-up like the 5DS/R or CFast to change this - even if I'd prefer not to deal with yet a third card format myself.

Now, I very seldom shoot long bursts, but if I where to get a 5DIV to supplement my 5DS/R that actually makes its far less of an obvious upgrade for action shots to me.

Even the 5DS/R will shoot for ~3.7 sec @ 5fps (18-19 shots) before slowing down. 5DIV has 40% more fps, but the 5DS has >20% longer time to follow the action when that's important. For me its mostly short bursts 3-4 pictures and once in a while (very seldom) long bursts - but these few times I really want the burst to be as long as possible. YMMV.

5DIII could keep shooting much longer reaching ~5.2 sec @6fps with a fully charged battery - or for even longer as fps drops as the 5DIII battery level drops (I know it can only do 6fps as long as you do not use both card slots and forgo the added safety...).

Enjoying your IV?

Upon shooting with it for the first time today, I simply adore my mark 4. Surprisingly the slight weight gain does make a little difference, and the 30 MP is a lot better for what I shoot. Mind you, for dropping 5G on a camera body which isn't even top of the line, you should get something pretty darn good. To be honest, it is pretty darn good, but that's all. There are no nifty new surprises or anything like that, and TBH looking at the photos on the computer it's virtually impossible to tell if they were shot on a mark 3 or 4. Those of you who also bit the bullet, what are your thoughts so far?

5D4 - Post for Consolidating What We Know (and Don't Know) Prior to Delivery

It's my hope that this discussion stick to the collection of information of specs and tech for the 5D4. One can hope...

The 5D4 appears to be a collection of 3 notable things:
1) A set of very nice upgraded features, such as a long-needed improved shutter action, intervalometer, DLO, the little thumb switchy thing, and perhaps a dozen other such niceties, which are easy to dismiss until you've grown accustomed to them in another recent camera.

2) Pretty significant sensor improvements that have been soaked up primarily by A- a 50 percent increase in pixels and B- some low-ISO dynamic range improvements. This means that those who hoped to get a 4.5 year tech leap in high ISO, low-light shooting were left behind. You can't get both that and 30 mp today, apparently. This remains an area we'll know more about quickly, once some cameras make it out to people willing to shoot RAW and shoot some side-by-side comparisons. As usual, provided JPEGs are about as useful in making conclusions on this as, say, an artist's charcoal rendition of what they believe the sensor might be able to output.

3) A stealthy Dual Pixel Raw file set of features that remain more mysterious than one would expect upon the launch of the technology. The main Canon launch materials were pretty poor at describing what these were, but eventually some videos surfaces of before-and-after versions of pictures exploiting the technology. In my opinion, it's pretty cool, although certainly limited to an edge effect, with the minuscule parallax provided by the dual pixels not allowing for much adjustment in post. But, again, in my opinion, this is a bonafide magical surprise.

Key Upgrades:
- Low ISO dynamic range is said to have gained. Explorers of Light have been eager to tout the increased ability to raise shadows in their shots. This sounds a lot like the 1DX2's pattern where on-chip ADC allowed them to push more stops on the low-ISO end.
- 50 percent megapixels upgrade
- Dual pixel
- 1 more fps
- Wifi & NFC
- GPS
- 4k
- Touchy-feely display
- Improved metering
- A bit bigger AF point coverage, and more cross-types
- Various software features, including DLO, diffraction correction, intervalometer, etc.
- Various hardware features, including slicker shutter, a thumb button, bringing the weather sealing up to the 7D2 snuff

Not Upgrades:
- There has been no mention of the linking between metering and focus point, a 1-series longtime favorite. You'll have to pony up another $3k to own that small subroutine in software.
- High ISO low light hasn't been touted as a big gain. This may indicate that it is not better or is only very slightly better, as the 1DX2 proved to be.

Former Areas of Mystery:
- Dual Pixel Raw tricks: lots of speculation here, and now we know that most of it was true, only not terribly large in its effect. Pick your bokeh position; sharpen your point of focus by what looks like the equivalent of a +3 MFA adjustment; reduce ghosting by perhaps 30 percent. But (big but) you need to use Canon's software to do these tricks (Wah, wah, wahhhhh).

Current Areas of Mystery:
- High ISO, low light performance. There were some nice (JPG) pictures at about 10,000 ISO that didn't show objectionable grain, but it's impossible to know what the actual light values were when they were taken. I expect RAWs will leak out within a week, as they have in the past, and we'll know.
- The degree to which the Dual Pixel Raw tricks are effective, and - especially - the frequency with which the tricks can come to bear to make much of a difference on an average shot.
- The likelihood of Adobe being able to digest Dual Pixel Raws and do something useful with them in Lightroom eventually.

That's my first impression from what we've been told and shown in the past 24 hours. Would be very happy for people to fill in the holes or correct any misimpressions.

Is 5d overkill for me?

I am an amateur but avid photographer. I had a 6D which I was happy with. Unfortunately it broke (water damage) and I need to find a replacement. I am wondering if should just recorder 6d or get 5D series. I mostly shoot pictures (landscapes, portraits, street etc). I am aware of better AF system on 5D but I do little action photography. I do shoot video occasionally. Given that I used snapshot feature of 6d heavily for my limited video recording use of 6d, I find it quite disconcerting that video snapshot is missing entirely from 5D. That might indicate 5D caters more to professionals (who don't care about snapshot feature?) and as much as I might benefit from its advanced features and capabilities, I don't need it? Except for this feature 5D seems a superset of 6D and wouldn't have given me a pause otherwise.

Thanks
Deepinder.

WonderPana FreeArc XL for Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM Lens

Has anyone used this yet? I ordered the TS-E 17 f/4L version the other day specifically to use with their ND1000 filter for architectural shots to blur out people & cars and was curious what the XL version is like, other than huge. I have also been using the Breakthrough Filters 10-stopper with great luck on my 24-70 f/2.8II and 70-200 f/2.8 IS II lenses.

I'm honestly trying to decide between the FreeArc XL and the 16-35 f/4 IS as I can live with the 16mm (for exteriors at least). I think I can deal with the size if the quality is decent, but will go with the lens if the adapter and dinner plates don't measure up.

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Firmware 1.1 Coming Soon

HTML:
Based on feedback from large photo organizations, news photojournalists, and so on, Canon has delivered a significant firmware upgrade for the EOS-1D X Mark II camera.  Firmware upgrade version 1.1 clearly targets professional users and organizations, but as you’ll see, some of these features may be useful to individual working pros or even serious photography enthusiasts.  We’ll examine what’s new in this firmware upgrade in this article.</p>
<p><strong>In a nutshell: what’s new and different?</strong></p>
<p>This new upgrade (version 1.1) addresses specific issues that professional news and photojournalism organizations have brought to Canon’s attention — we understand that not all of these will be important in more ordinary, everyday use to individual photographers. That said, the changes and new features that this firmware adds to the EOS-1D X Mark II camera are the ability to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Install up to 39 items of IPTC information into the camera, and to add data (or deliberately not apply it) to images you take</li>
<li>Add set-up information for up to 40 new Wi-Fi® networks to a memory card, and load that data as a full set of possible Wi-Fi networks to select from for connection</li>
<li>Transfer only “protected” images via Wi-Fi</li>
<li>Retain GPS position data:  Continue to apply last known GPS location information to images subsequently taken, even if GPS connection is lost (photographer went inside a building, etc.)</li>
<li>Change LCD color tone (four pre-defined settings), to either approximate display from other cameras you’re working with, or to shift color tone based on ambient lighting as the LCD monitor is being used</li>
</ul>
<p>The aim of these changes is to enhance a professional photographer’s workflow; improve on-location network and Wi-Fi operations (especially for photographers working at large events, with many Wi-Fi networks in simultaneous operation); and to smooth the process of transferring images and managing them with new embedded metadata.  We’ll take a brief look at each, to shed some light on what changes and potential applications have been implemented.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that the EOS-1D X Mark II differs from other Canon EOS models in that it not only permits network communication and transfer of images via Wi-Fi (using the optional WFT-E8A or WFT-E6A wireless file transmitters), but also via wired ethernet connection — there’s a dedicated ethernet port on the camera for this purpose.  This allows similar network connectivity, but without some of the variables users can encounter on-location with Wi-Fi transmission.  Firmware v. 1.1 doesn’t change this; we only want to remind users of it here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2016/eos1dx-markii-firmware-update.shtml">Read more at the Canon Digital Learning Center</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

B&H Hosting a Live Panel Discussion For EOS 5D Mark IV at 2PM EST

HTML:
B&H Photo is holding a live panel discussion to talk about all things EOS 5D Mark IV.</p>
<p>The panel includes Canon Explorers of Light; Ken Sklute & Denis Regie, Canon and Kelby advisor Larry Becker, as well as Canon technical advisors Brent Ramsey & Rudy Winston.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/promotion/12088/canon-eos-5d-mark-iv.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296">Tune it at 2PM EST at B&H Photo Here</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Please bear with me a moment

Most of my shooting now is tripod close-up/macro utilizing my 180 macro mounted on a dated 1Ds3.
I also use Canon Utility Software tethered to my computer using the LV function with the automatic
focus changes with the arrow gizmos which I then use to stack images using PS CC.
1000 pixel example with some artifacts.

Being an anal retentive SOB...are there any of the newer cameras that will cough out better IQ?

4K video resolution betweeen 5D IV and 1dX II

Hey guys, thought I would start this topic since I know a lot of us are using these cameras for a combination of both photo and video. I am in the market for a new camera, hot on my mk3 for years, however I want to make sure I get the best video quality possible. Do you think there will be a noticeable difference in the 4K output of the 1dx ii over the 5d iv. other than the 60fps in 4K, do you see any other differences in the video between th two cameras?

thanks :)

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB