• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Selling my 7Dmk2 for the 1Dx

Hi everyone,

I am the lucky owner of a 5D3 and a 7D2. I bought the 7D2 last year as most of the time I do wildlife photography. The 5D3 replaced 2 years ago my 7D. I have never been very happy with the results of my 7D2 and the Sigma 150-600 Sport lens. Because of that, during my trip to Namibia last year I even used the 150-600 on the 5D3 and my 70-200 f2,8 on the 7D2. When I am not shooting wildlife I use the 5D3 all the time.

In Europe nowadays, I can afford buying the 1Dx as its price has decreased.

I am afraid to loose the crop factor of the 7D2 because here in Belgium getting close to wildlife is a challenge. I am also afraid to invest so much money on a camera. But I know that i would not be disappointed by the IQ.
Maybe I should wait for the 5D4 that will certainly come close to the 1Dx in terms of IQ and offer a small bump in burst performance.

What are your opinions and thoughts? Anyone has used the 1Dx with the Sigma 150-600S ??

Thanks

Vincent

What is everyone's experiences on graduated ND filters?

I am looking into purchasing some graduated ND filters and it seems like there is quite a variety out there with significant cost differences. I've read about the color changes etc. I wanted to see if there was anyone actually using the various filters that may give their experience. I would be most commonly using them for sunrise/sets or water scenes. I suspect most commonly on my Canon 16-35mm F2.8L II or 24-70mm F2.8L II.

These both have 82 mm filter sizes, so do you need another bracket to go to 77mm?
What filter stop difference is most commonly used 3? 6? 10?
Any other words of wisdom?

Thank you!

Canon 24-70 f/2.8 II Lens Hood Falls Off?

I've owned the ever popular 24-105 f/4L IS Lens since early 2010. It has seen it all. (Literally! LOL.) After 6 years of good service, it still works like new. No creep, etc.

The 24-105 Lens Hood (Bayonet style), if anything, is TIGHTER than when it was new. That hood has endured a lot of abuse to protect the lens. It has never fallen off. Sometimes it can be a pain to get it lined up when I flip it around to reattach it to put it back in the lens bag. But I can always rely on it to stay attached like it's glued on.

I was excited when I received the new 24-70 f/2.8 II with the button lock hood and easier/smoother attachment. (Since I have had great luck with the 70-200 f/2.8 II hood which is similar.)

Unfortunately, the 24-70 f/2.8 II button lock lens hood falls off easily. It's too loose and when hanging at my hip, it has fallen off numerous times and no, my hip is not hitting the button, it is always positioned to the outside.

Anyone else have this problem? The hood doesn't look broken, cracked or otherwise compromised. It just doesn't stay attached as well as the 70-200 hood. Why?? I think it might flex a bit easier but I'm not sure.


Thoughts?

Hyperfocal Lens Geeks - ASSEMBLE!

Hey guys, I've a Q about hyperfocal distancing that is frying my brain a little.

I shoot my evening shots flash assisted. Using the 16-35mm lens I set the aperture to F8, adjust the ISO and flash power to suit and set the lens manually at 1.5m. Simple stuf.

Generally everything is in focus front and back for dance floor shots. Which suits me fine. However, I would like a longer focal length with the same functionality.

Is there a difference between how wide a lens is and its hyperfocal distance? For example, is a 135L lens different from a 35-300mm lens at 135mm?

I'd like more reach around the 50-85mm mark and sometimes it's a little too dark for my 85mm to acquire focus. The other way is to stop the aperture down further but that taxes the flashes more.

Thanks!

CPS late returns

I am wondering if anyone has had any experience with how CPS in the U.S. handles slightly late returns of trial equipment. The trial period is very brief and since it includes shipping time, it can be hard to evaluate a piece of equipment and meet Canon's deadline for returns. Has anyone had experience with not getting a lens or camera body back to Canon on time and what were the consequences?

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Coming Early?

HTML:
We’re told by someone that they’ve been informed by B&H Photo that the first shipments of the EOS-1D X Mark II camera bodies were received by the retailer on April 1, 2016. The customer spoke with a rep at B&H Photo and they were told that some of the preorders will be met with the initial shipment of cameras. To further the good news, the customer’s credit card has been charged for the camera and they’ll likely receive a shipping notice today or tomorrow.</p>
<p>We do not know how many cameras B&H Photo has received.</p>
<p>If any other retailer has received the camera, please let us know.</p>
<p><strong>Preorder the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Premium Kit $5999 (Reg $6299): <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1221604-REG/canon_0931c016_eos_1d_x_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=www.adorama.com/ICA1DXM2KP.html" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1m9GcsS" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/23Mjw42" target="_blank">Canon Store</a></li>
<li>Canon WFT-E8A $599: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1221610-REG/canon_1173c001_wft_e7a_wireless_file_transmitter.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICAWFTE8A.html?KWID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1POf7D2" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/23MjDMI" target="_blank">Canon Store</a></li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Anyone have two bodies & have them have a different shutter sound?

So a few months ago I had a problem with my 5D3's having different shutter sounds after sending it in got a shutter repair once, so I sent it in again and they fixed it but didn't tell me what the cause of the problem was.


So now after taking advantage of the incredible price decrease on the 1DX with the MK2 coming out I went ahead and purchased a new one & noticed the shutter sounded completely different to the one I already owned since October, it's... best described as less clicky? and more of a deeper sound, I've tried shooting off a few bursts at 12fps to see if it's affecting anything and so far 9/10 tries have been that it would take 31 pictures and the newer one would take 32-33.

Does anyone else have this problem & should I send it in to cps or just ignore & and accept it's because it's a older camera with close to 45k shutter shots?

The Follow-Up to the EOS 5D Mark III Will be Called...... [CR2]

HTML:
<p>We’re told by a couple of people that they’re 100% sure the follow-up to the EOS 5D Mark III will be called the “EOS 5D Mark IV” and not the reported “EOS 5D X” moniker. Unfortunately, there is no other information available at this time about the EOS 5D Mark IV, which tells us there is no imminent announcement for NAB.</p>
<p>We’re still placing our bets on this camera being announced in August and showcased at Photokina in Cologne, Germany in September, 2016.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

15-85 Equivalent on Full Frame

Hi All,

I am currently a 7D owner and am going to upgrade to FF this year. Probably to a 5D 4 when it comes out, if the specs / price work for me.

I currently use a efs 15-85 as my general purpose lens and absolutely love it. I am struggling to find something equivalent.

My 15-85 gets treated poorly and would like to be able to do similar with the new lens. I would also like to be able to take just one lens on holidays with me, so a bit of extra reach would be great.

I would like it to have IS and be at least moderately weather sealed and be under 1500 AUD.

I have considered:

Canon 24-105 - I hear mixed reviews, is it too old in the tooth and will be crappy on a modern FF camera?
Canon 24-70 f4 IS - I hear it has some sort of optical issue, that I could understand
Sigma 24-105 - I hear better iq than the canon but no weather sealing
Tamron 24-70 - generally well reviewed, af issues? Probably my current front runner, even if it tops out at 70.

I had considered the canon 16-35 f4 as I plan to get a copy one day for landscapes but thought it would be too short as a general lens and would have to bring my 70-300 L on every holiday.

If it helps my other lenses are:
Tamron sp 35
Canon 50 L
Canon 100 L macro
Canon 70-300 L
A bunch of smc takuma adapted lenses.

The reason I ask now is I am going on a holiday in a couple of weeks so I could get the lens in advance of the camera tax free.

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Has anyone else gone through the same thing? What did you choose and are you happy?

Cheers

Petja

Upgrading from 5DIII to 5DIV -- your probable reasons?

So curious as to which reasonably probably improvements would motivate you to upgrade?
I don't want to read "zero noise at ISO 64,000" or "eye focus" like my A2e film bodies or ...
With three "C" modes, I can utilize so many of the 5DIII features with a minimum of diddling -- so I feel that my upgrade from 70D to 5DIII would be a good investment at today's prices. I already have FF glass.
Waiting for some Holy Grail costing over $3,500 for the 1st two years seems senseless.
Your thoughts?

yet a crop vs. full frame question (500mm f4 + 7d) vs. (500mm f4 + 1.4x + 1dx)

Sorry for it, but I have question that may again raise the crop vs. full frame discussion.


I own a 500mm f4ii and I am wandering which would be the best setup if I need additional reach among the two options, crop vs. full frame:


CF: attaching to the lens a 7dii
FF: attaching to the lens a 2xiii and a 1dxii (a setup equivalent to a 700 f5.6 lens)


I know that the full frame option gives a setup equivalent to a 700mm f5.6 lens on a 20mp sensor, while the crop option will give a setup equivalent to an 800mm f6.4 lens on a 20mp sensor (somewhat different).


Apart from the difference in the equivalent focal distance and aperture, is there any major advantage of one setup vs. the other?


The question is not theoretical for me. I will later this year buy a 1dxii, and I was thinking to buy also a 7dii to be almost permanently attached to the 500mmf4ii, except from when I need less reach, when I would use the 1dxii.


Thank you very much for your recommendations!

Oh Canada, Lens Prices Have Gone Crazy in the Great White North

HTML:
<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-canada-price-increases-confirmed/" target="_blank">As promised</a>, Canon Canada has raised MSRP on most lenses in Canada.</p>
<p>Here are some of the new prices to ruin your Friday! (All Prices CAD)</p>
<ul>
<li>EF 16-35 f/4L $1609.99</li>
<li>EF 16-35 f/2.8L II $2339.99</li>
<li>EF 17-40 f/4L $1169.99</li>
<li>EF 24-70 f/4L IS $1469.99</li>
<li>EF 24-70 f/2.8L II $2779.99</li>
<li>EF 70-200 f/4L IS $1759.99</li>
<li>EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II $3069.99</li>
<li>EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II $3,219.99</li>
<li>EF 200-400 f/4L EF IS $16,079.99</li>
<li>EF 300 f/2.8L IS II $8,909.99</li>
<li>EF 400 f/2.8L IS II $14,619.99</li>
<li>EF 500 f/4L IS II $13,159.99</li>
<li>EF 600 f/4.0L IS $16,799.99</li>
<li>EF 800 f/5.6 L IS $18,999.99</li>
</ul>
<p>This is not an April Fools joke, you can visit <a href="http://www.canon.ca/inetCA/en/subCategoryHome/msegid/2/catid/17/scatid/72" target="_blank">Canon Canada</a> and see for yourself.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Just had a long play with a 80D in store

Hi everyone...! ;)

I went to a local camera store here in Adelaide, South Australia – and a had a long time of playing with the new Canon 80D. They’ve had a few 80Ds on the shelves this week, with a number already being sold to folk who pre-ordered. They had a 80D with the new 18-135mm nano-USM lens kit for me to try / play with.

As a 7D user (and a 350D before that… but let’s not go there) here are some observations from using the camera in store (but not actually taking any images to view on a large monitor):
a) It felt comfortable in my hand (I have average size hands for an adult male). Notably smaller and lighter than my 7D, but also somewhat (slightly) less rigid (the metal frame in the 7D is notable). Not that I was trying to ‘flex’ the body- it felt ‘solid’ – but not as ‘immovably rigid’ as my 7D.
b) Optical AF was incredibly fast on this new “kit lens” – notably faster than any STM lens, and significantly faster than other non-STM kit lenses I have used. Racks from macro to 5 metres in less than half a second. And back the same way.
c) Optical AF speed of the central AF point seemed to AF a smidgeon faster than other points.
- If pushed, I would say if anything the central point faster is slightly than my 7D with 15-85mm USM, whereas the other points about the same as my 7D points. That’s probably the -3 EV capability helping in a fairly low-light shop (no natural light streaming into this store, and I was in a somewhat darker lit part of the store... just low level lighting).
d) The overall AF points layout is very, very nice. I really like those 45 points, particularly for off central composition and focusing. Gonna be hard going home to ‘only’ 19 on my 7D
e) The 80D’s wheel/D pad is not as intuitive / tactile as the “joystick and larger wheel combination” of my 7D… though I already started to get used to using the 80D’s multi-controller wheel /D-pad at the end of my time in store.
f) Most of the controls felt fairly intuitive and familiar after a few minutes (though I probably do ‘learn’ camera layouts fairly quickly). The AF back-button felt very comfortable to me. I read someone writing it was not comfortable for them… but this was not the case for me. Shutter button and front wheel feel comfortable / natural.
g) The 18-135mm nano-USM’s focus ring does not appear to have FTM like the USM on my 15-85mm or 70-300mm L, etc. It seemed to not be engaged to the focus mechanism all the time (perhaps it is fly by wire / STM style?) I didn’t spend long checking this out, as it is not of much concern for me on that type of lens. I noted the lens does not have a focus window (which for some reason I expected it had!)
h) The 18-135mm feels very well balanced on the 80D DSLR body. The 18-135mm does extend notably during zooming.
i) The 80D viewfinder probably felt quite similar, if anything perhaps a little smaller than my 7D’s. However it could be perception. I didn’t adjust the eye dioptre… so that could have something to do with it (I typically need to adjust it a fair bit, as I’m quite nearsighted and wear glasses)
j) Live View AF was incredible! Both in photo mode and in video, the speed and surety of obtaining initial focus, and tracking a moving subject/object e.g. a staff member walking by, was very good. It felt only slightly slower than say the optical AF speed of a STM lens. With the new lens, it’s definitely not as quick as optical AF view, but not much off it. It feels 5 to 10 times quicker (in the relatively dim light) than my 7D’s Live View AF.
k) I managed to get Live View AF to ‘mis-hunt’ and eventually not lock focus when I zoomed right in on a black bag with little contrast / no bright features (in dim light). However for all other “scenes” – Live View acquired focus confidently (just once or twice it hunted / hesitated for a split second with little contrast, e.g. the bench surface, which was almost pure white). But most other “scenes” (e.g. lenses on the shelf, the bank/ credit-card-reader) it got accurate AF almost instantly. My 7D would have struggled and not been able to obtain AF in many of these cases (it was in my hand, and hand shake, even with IS on, does not assist the older/ slower non-DPAF).
l) The ‘beep’ sounded softer than on my 7D (but I have it turned off on my 7D). Or am I going deafer? Lol
m) Shutter sound is softer than the 7D. I appreciate this… particularly if photographing in quiet environments (e.g. church), or not wanting to scare animals away.
n) Articulated screen was bright and easy to use (though I didn’t take it outside). I did not move the articulated screen out… but may do that on a subsequent visit…
o) I explored a bit of the menu system… I found I didn’t use the touchscreen (as I am not used to touchscreen on cameras… yet). But if I get an 80D that could change!
p) Some Q functions are laid out a bit differently after the Q button press. But easy to work out after a second looking at the screen.
q) I could easily have played with it for longer… but I needed to get back to work. 

If anyone has specific questions about the handling of the camera (or other ‘first impressions’ that I may be able to share)… please ask me.
I cannot answer about the camera’s image quality, etc – as I do not have any photos from that in-store camera to look at.

Cheers… looking forward to your replies, and others use and impressions of this quite impressive new Canon DSLR.

Paul 8)

Need zoom lens for South Africa Kruger park trip

So I will be traveling to South Africa with National Geographic expedition.

I'm a beginner photographer.

My gear is a Canon 600D with 18-55 mm standard lens

My budget is open and I prefer buying lens that will satisfy me for a long time. Budget is open but then again I'm a beginner.

I wouldn't mind renting expensive lens for a once in a lifetime trip.

New 7D2 'studio version' released?

Every time I think Canon has too many camera bodies, I find out about nutty once-every-so-often left field releases like the astro rigs or, now, this:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=17982

I played the video briefly and see what they're doing here. But why on earth does this need dedicated hardware? Couldn't firmware have been released to tinker with the EXIF files instead?

- A

PZ tests Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art on both 5DSR and 5D2

Fascinating:
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/973-sigma20f14art?start=1

PZ switched over to a 5DSR for its FF testing last year, but they haven't exactly set the world alight with a massive lens retest effort like DXO has. But in a new wrinkle, they slapped the same lens on their prior reference rig, the 5D2.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this.... or are you all still angry at the coma performance that crushed your astro hopes and dreams?

- A

  • Poll Poll
1DX Firmware Upgrade with DPAF

How much would you pay for Canon to upgrade your 1DX to have AF for video?

  • Up to US$500

    Votes: 5 38.5%
  • Up to US$750

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Up to US$1,000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to US$1,500

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I would not pay for such an upgrade

    Votes: 7 53.8%

Another thread got me thinking.

We know that the C100 came out without AF, but then Canon issued a firmware update which you could pay for to get AF (or DPAF, not entirely sure of the correct term, nor what they did exactly). This was not an OTA update, you had to give it the camera to Canon to upgrade for you.

My question, and it is extremely unlikely Canon would ever do this, but would you pay to have such a firmware upgrade/update on your current 1DX? And if so, how much would you be willing to pay?

I know I would pay, but of course not too much because then you are better off getting the 1DX Mark II when it comes out.

Thoughts?

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB