• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Opinion: Does Cinema EOS Mark the End of High Spec Canon DSLR Video?

HTML:
<p><a href="http://www.eoshd.com/2014/11/cinema-eos-mark-end-high-spec-canon-dslr-video/" target="_blank">Andrew at EOSHD.com</a> has posted an opinion piece on the future of high spec video features in Canon DSLRs. I’ve had this conversation with people in the past, and I feel somewhat the way Andrew does, in that I don’t see Canon speccing DSLRs as well as future Cinema EOS products. While I have been told a video focused DSLR is coming for NAB 2015, it won’t be a high end professional product.</p>
<p>There was a year when all I saw on videographer rigs was Canon DSLR cameras, but it seems that time has passed. I now see a lot of Cinema EOS cameras as well as smaller offerings from other manufacturers, and I do believe Canon wants videographers using C100’s as opposed to 5D Mark IIIs..</p>
<p>I agree with some of the points at EOSHD, but disagree with others. For Canon, it’s about making money and understanding markets with growth potential and markets in decline. The professional high margin segment is probably where the best chance of growth lies. I think selling more cameras and lenses to Hollywood along with support services is a much better strategy to grow revenue, and more importantly income, than it would be to offer a $2000 4K mirrorless camera for enthusiasts.</p>
<p>We’ll see how the next few years shapes up, and I expect 2015 will give us lots of hints of where Canon sees the future of videography & cinematography going.</p>
<p><strong>From EOSHD

</strong><em>“If Canon announced that they were withdrawing from the enthusiast stills camera market, you’d be surprised. It’s a pretty big market. But withdraw from the enthusiast video market they almost certainly have at the moment, whether they meant to do or not.</em></p>
<p><em><span id="more-14592"></span>Whilst we ponder Canon’s deeply uninspired 2014 in terms of technological innovation, consider this theory – Canon entered the enthusiast DSLR video market by accident and now they have pulled out of it by accident.</em></p>
<p><em>Whether they like it or not, Canon DSLRs are no longer 1st, 2nd, 3rd or even 4th best performing enthusiast options for video. Nikon, Sony, Panasonic and Samsung are all significantly ahead, and if we count Blackmagic (they’re actually more pro than enthusiast) Canon are down to 6th. Just 2 years ago they were 1st. What happened?”</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eoshd.com/2014/11/cinema-eos-mark-end-high-spec-canon-dslr-video/" target="_blank"><strong>Read the full article</strong></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Review: Canon EOS 7D Mark II

HTML:
<p>DPReview has completed their review of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II and it’s extremely positive. They make a special effort to stress this camera is not an incremental update to the original EOS 7D.</p>
<p><strong>From the review</strong>

<em>“It would be easy to write off the EOS 7D Mark II as just an incremental upgrade to the original 7D, but that would be a serious mistake. The two cameras may share the number 7 and the letter D on their bodies, but inside they are very different machines.</em></p>
<p><em>With the 7D II Canon is putting a stake in the ground that it is committed to the crop sensor market. Although it will likely be seen as an aspirational camera for novices, or an upgrade path to people using more consumer oriented crop sensor bodies from Canon, the 7D II is unquestionably a pro camera. It’s built like a tank, has the control layout of a 5D Mark III and an autofocus system to compete with the 1D X.</em></p>
<p><em>Canon has added lots of tools to the Mark II, but one deserves special mention. Dual-Pixel autofocus may be one of the most important, and yet under-appreciated, technologies introduced to digital cameras in a long time. It’s significant that Canon now includes this technology on their Cinema EOS cameras. Canon still seems to be dialing in the optimal implementation for the technology, but it will be exciting to see how it evolves.”</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> </strong>| <strong><strong><strong><strong>EOS 7D Mark II in stock $1799: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081808-REG/canon_9128b002_eos_7d_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=4IHYPE3ZKJN5VL4X" target="_blank">Amazon</a></strong></strong></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Tamron [email protected] distance

Just done an image size check of the moon this morning at 600 and the same at 400 on both Canon 100-400 and the 400/5.6.

Image size for the Canons was the same but the Tamron was almost exactly 1.50 times bigger i.e. with the Tamron at distance (say beyond 100m) you get the full 600mm. Obviously this falls dramatically with multi element zooms as your operating distance gets down towards close focus.

Brian Carnahan quotes a figure of 570mm but does not say what the calibration distance was.

100-400 II - first shots

just picked up 100-400 II
no micro adjust... sun was fading fast...and a windstorm developing... walked out to Burnside PortlandOregon

a few shots... before I had to be somewhere else...

also tried the tamron sp pro 1.4x tc...
noticed a slightly slower focus speed...


overall the lens is rugged, compact.....sits next to 24-105 f4...well...

that is about what I wanted...
it is NOT an f2.8 70-200 zoom ...about 2 stops gone there.....
and I have no idea how well it does compared to 70-200 @ 400 with canon 2x TC......
mine was pretty good ...focus lagged a bit...

but this is smaller....which is where I have moved this cycle..
still have 14 II, sig 35, 85 f1.2 and macro for all thos specialized shots...

but this lens ..with the 24-105, and close focus, takes the 500 diopter, my polarizer so it could travel ...well....

lots of shooting to do...
this is first hour..
and you will surely see lots of great shots from others ...

I passed on the 100-400 pump... but this one seems right for me..

by the way....the packing job on the lens is amazing...
good grief..... this is so carefully thought thru....
they could have a teevee show/contest...for people to try to repack it just like it came....
no one would win

yes...I did get turned around with zoom up front... but getting adjusted now....
...
some award winning shots to follow..
last two are tamron sp pro TC... 560mm

again no micro adjust...5d3


thanks CanonRumors for a great group to read/learn from...and an easy place to exchange ideas...

Attachments

  • Image01.jpg
    Image01.jpg
    675 KB · Views: 385
  • Image02.jpg
    Image02.jpg
    651.9 KB · Views: 318
  • Image03.jpg
    Image03.jpg
    688.5 KB · Views: 294
  • Image04.jpg
    Image04.jpg
    514.8 KB · Views: 752
  • Image05.jpg
    Image05.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 323
  • Image06.jpg
    Image06.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 323
  • Image07.jpg
    Image07.jpg
    872.6 KB · Views: 301

Re: New review of old 16-35 F/2.8 II

I've owned this lens before and agree it is a great lens but I feel the review is misleading or at least unfair. It says the 16-35 F/2.8 II has superior optics to the 17-40L... it doesn't. I've owned several copies of both. Not to say it isn't good, neither is it necessarily worse... but superior? No. The 17-40 F4L is actually slightly optically "superior" if i had to give a nod to one. But it's so small it's not worth mentioning. Go take a look at The Digital Picture test charts. It's roughly the same throughout all apertures and focal lengths with a slight edge going to the 17-40--duh it's simpler in terms of internals and doesn't have to bend as much light. (to put it in caveman terms) Of course, the 16-35 F4 IS beats both hands down. The only reason to own the 16-35 is if you absolutely need 2.8. But I suspect at F4 and a strobe of some sort, you'll have more than enough... not to mention better depth of field =)

The review also shows how "awesome' this lens is and gives many example shots. And they are great shots... but those shots are stopped down--could've been taken with a lighter (optically equivalent) 17-40L or with superior 16-35 F4 IS. So not sure what the point of the review is.

I've owned about three copies of the 16-35 2.8 II and 7-10 of the 17-40L. Both are great but found the 17-40L the easier lens to justify. I now own the 16-35 F4 IS and am very impressed by it. Now that is an optically superior lens.

I mistakenly had this in "JPG" when I shot it but you get the idea. I love my 16-35 F4!

15384646946_87d226f504_c.jpg


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00K8942SO/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00K8942SO&linkCode=as2&tag=il734-20&linkId=CRVDZTWMJWH5AGJA

http://www.canonrumors.com/reviews/review-canon-ef-16-35mm-f2-8l-ii/

Dpreview: Review of the 7D2

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/9654262477/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-review

Dpreview writes:
"If you can justify the price tag it's hard to fault Canon's new APS-C flagship. With class-leading image quality, fast operation and excellent handling the EOS 7D is everything a semi-pro model should be--and the excellent movie mode will be a welcome bonus to those that like their pictures to move. Arguably the best APS-C SLR on the market today."

Advice about the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD

Hallo everyone,

I'm considering buying this lens. I read some very good reviews. I checked TDP hier, http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=687&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp=833&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=3&APIComp=0 and the sharpness seems to fall off at 200mm. Is this a common problem and does it matter in real life?

Thanks for any advice.

Bigdaddy

7D Mark II incompatible with Tamron SP AF tele-converter

Discovered to day that my new Tamron tele-converter does not work with my new 7D Mark II. It works fine on both my old 7D and on the 6D. I use it with the 70-300mm L F4-5.6 lens. Hope that a future firmware update allows me to use it. It totally locks up the new Mark II and the only way to unlock it is to pull the battery out of the camera.

Custom ICC Printer Profiles

I am curious how many of you use custom IIC printer profiles and how effective they are? Also, what product do you use to profile your printer? Does anyone use a third party to generate the profiles?

I often use x-rite color passport to profile my camera (1Dx) and I use the ColorMunki to profile my display weekly (Dell Ultrasharp 3014). I use the Epson provided ICC profiles for my 3880. I consistently find myself printing a photo 4 or 5 times until I am happy with it... Then I have one image that looks good on my monitor/ the web and a different image for printing.

I would appreciate any advice or direction!

Have a GREAT day!
tom (Win the Day)

More on The Coming 4K Camcorder [CR2]

HTML:
<p>We’ve been told the following and it looks to lineup with something <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/12/4k-fixed-lens-camcorder-coming-cr2/" target="_blank">we posted earlier last week about a fixed lens 4K camcorder coming from Canon</a>.</p>
<p class="p1"><strong>The new 4K camcorder coming</strong></p>
<ul>
<li class="p1"><span class="s1">Direct competition to Sony’s X-70</span></li>
<li class="p1">Sensor size will be about 1″</li>
<li class="p1">Form factor will resemble the Canon EOS C100 on a smaller scale</li>
<li class="p1">Priced around the Sony X-70</li>
<li class="p1">It will definitely be 4K</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Photo Credit: Matt Buchanan // <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5628823/canons-4k-camera-concept-please-be-real-one-day" target="_blank">Gizmodo.com</a></em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Tamron 24-70 or Sigma 24-105?

Tamron 24-70mm F2.8 vs Sigma ART 24-105mm F4.0
Hi Fellas! im between these two lenses as my next investment.
Does anyone have these two lenses?
which one is sharper?
Which one would you choose for landscapes and portraits and why?
The downside of the sigma is its f4.0 widest aperture. As i like Bokeh very much
its been difficult to decide between these two.
Opinions? Thank you

Btw it is for my 6D.

100D + 24mmSTM + 40mmSTM

I shoot with a 5D MKIII, but my wife finds it far too big and heavy, so i bought her a 100D and a 40mm.. she loved it! It even fits in her handbag (which apparently is a very important factor).

Now that the 24mm is out her kit is now becoming very appealing... Although 24mm on crop isn't so wide, it is only a little longer than a 35mm prime on a FF, which is a focal length i can deal with. the 40mm on a crop is actually pretty nice as a portrait lens.

This is now becoming our travel kit for weekends (well unless there is something specific i want my 5D for).

Anyway, it is a cheap (ish) great small light kit. no big surprises here, just happy my wife is happy and happy 'we' have a small travel kit! :)

I would recommend this set-up to most people. :)

EF 400mm f/5.6L USM vs Tamron 150-600?

I've started kicking the tires for a super telephoto - EF 400mm f/5.6L USM vs Tamron 150-600?

The reviews on Amazon for both are great. With either, I'd try a 2x III converter, which I already have.

I would be using it for sports, birds and wildlife at National Parks/wildlife refuges and zoos.

I will be using it with 60D/6D, which I have today, and maybe/probably later, the 7DII

Feedback?

Thx

Thinking about upgrading to a 6D from a 60D. Thoughts?

I've been using a Canon 60D for the past three years now and I am looking to make the jump to full frame. I don't know what the best course of action would be when it comes to getting rid of my current camera. I have a bunch of EF lenses I'll keep for my next camera and then my only EF-S lens is the 15-85mm. Is Adorama good when it comes to trade ins? I just moved to the United States so I've never used them before. I submitted a form and stuff listing my camera and the lens. How much do you think I'll be able to get for them? Both the camera and lens are in near perfect condition.

Thanks!

Anyone here switch from Canon to Sony A7r for landscape?

My main focus is landscape photography. I sell my photos once in a while and this is just a hobby for me. I also like to shoot action and video, but now strictly use my 7D II for that. If I purchased a Sony A7r, it would only replace my Canon 6D.

Eventually I would switch over to all Sony E lenses to bring into the field. The ease of packing a smaller backpack on long hikes, with a camera and lenses that are twice as light, if not more, is what I am after. I know about the larger MP and DR that comes with it and I will take it, but it's not the game changer here. I am extremely pleased with Canon 6D colors and quality. My largest print requested has been 30x40, so more MP really isn't needed for the most part. It's all about the comfort I would get and sparing my back as I get older. I'm so pleased with the 6D that I am scared to switch over and try the Sony.

If you have switched, have you noticed a bit of a difference from colors changing in your work comparing a raw image? Kind of like seeing colors from a Nikon compared to Canon!
Are you shooting with Sony lenses now and how would you compare it to the Canon glass?
Are you generally happy, or very happy with the change?

Thank you in advanced.

Question Sir/ Madam.

Just one question to my dear teachers and dear friends.
Why canon Company not just Do EF 24 MM F/ 2.8 STM Pancake for Canon Full Frame Cameras( Similar to EF 40 mm F/ 2.8 STM, Pancake)---BUT why they just do EF-S 24 MM and sell us now ?
No, It not make sense to me, EF Lens can use all Canon EOS Camera bodies and Canon can sell more of this EF Lenses, BUT Only EF-S can use with Small Sensor EOS Cameras only.
Yes, I will buy EF-S 24 mm Pancake Lens and use with Canon extention tube with my 1DS, and 5D MK II.
Thanks you, Sir/Surapon

  • Poll Poll
RTFM. Do you?

Do you Read The Flamin' Manual?

  • First study the manual before touching anything else?

    Votes: 11 7.8%
  • Have a quick fiddle then study the manual?

    Votes: 30 21.3%
  • Use item until you get stuck then look at the relevant bit in the manual?

    Votes: 50 35.5%
  • Manual? What's that? Do things have manuals?

    Votes: 7 5.0%
  • Twist, Push, Pull, Struggle, Oops is that bit supposed to come off? Where's the manual?

    Votes: 3 2.1%
  • I've read the manual and still refer to it regularly.

    Votes: 15 10.6%
  • Download and read the manual before buying a product.

    Votes: 18 12.8%
  • When all else fails read the manual.

    Votes: 7 5.0%

Hi Folks.
Just for giggles and to save hijacking someone else's post, do you RTFM, and what drove you to it?
I first resorted to RTFM as a child many years ago when I was trying to build a Technical Lego tractor from the picture on the front of the box! It hadn't gone too well, not as simple as it was to build the standard Lego cars and such just from the box image!
Technical Lego was new then, before it was called Lego Technics!
Since then I have tended to Read The Flamin' Manual first for most stuff.

Cheers, Graham.

Review: Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pancake

HTML:
<p>Bryan at the-digital-picture has completed his review of the Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lens. This lens seems to be the APS-C equivalent of the 40mm f/2.8 STM for full frame shooters and looks to be just as highly regarded.</p>
<p><strong>From TDP

</strong><em>“At the end of the 40 STM review, I made a statement that also applies to this pancake-style lens: “Overall, I’m finding very “little” to not like about this tiny, inexpensive lens.” It is fun to joke about this little lens, but … it is the real deal. Not only will it get the job done, it will do the job as well or better than many other lenses. And for a lower price. It is not hard to justify this purchase.”</em></p>
<p><strong>In Stock: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081812-REG/canon_9522b002_ef_s_24mm_f_2_8_is.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM $149 at B&H Photo</a></strong><strong>

</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Which mf split screen for 5d2/6d?

A friend of mine is about to buy a mf screen for his 5d2 and asked me which to get. Does anyone have any experiences with the actual products and knows if it's "worth it" getting the expensive ones? How is the performance, i.e. drop in light and dodgy metering?

This seems to be the "better" one(?): http://www.focusingscreen.com/product_info.php?cPath=21_98&products_id=761

This is the cheaper one (yes, .de site, but you get the picture): www.amazon.de/Delamax-Schnittbildmattscheibe-180°-für-Canon/dp/B003UUDL94/

Thanks for sharing any experiences!

Attachments

  • temp.png
    temp.png
    23.1 KB · Views: 718

Patent: EF-M 70-400 f/4.5-7.2 STM

HTML:
<p>A patent for a new supertelephoto zoom optical formula for the EOS M system has surfaced in the form of an EF-M 70-400 f/4.5-7.2 STM.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Patent Publication No. 2014-228734 (Google Translated)</strong>
<ul>
<li>Published 2014.12.8</li>
<li>Filing date 2013.5.23</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Example 3
<ul>
<li>Zoom ratio 5.58</li>
<li>The focal length f = 69.59-251.52-388.00mm</li>
<li>Fno. 4.68-6.30-7.00</li>
<li>Half angle ω = 11.11-3.11-2.02 °</li>
<li>Image height 13.66mm</li>
<li>Overall length of the lens 155.01-227.97-240.02mm</li>
<li>BF 15.81-37.15-46.87mm</li>
<li>Inner focus</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2014-12-10" target="_blank">EG</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB