Threads
Canon L lens shooter gets trampled by the Queen's Guard
- By vjlex
- Canon Lenses
- 1 Replies
For lack of a place to post this, I found this video hilarious. https://youtu.be/NTr50aHGDnI
Of course, couldn't help but notice his big white lens. Hmm... I wonder if it's anyone on this forum. :
Of course, couldn't help but notice his big white lens. Hmm... I wonder if it's anyone on this forum. :
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM - my experience (and comparison with 50mm f/1.8 II)
- By pj1974
- Canon Lenses
- 9 Replies
Hi everyone
Please … let me share my little story of excitement with you all. 
A few weeks ago I bought the 50mm STM. I was perhaps the first person in my city (Adelaide, South Australia) to get one. During my lunch break I went in to the largest camera store in Adelaide, to check if they had this lens. This store is also usually the first local bricks and mortar store to get new stock. Well, as it was, they had some arrive just the day before.
I asked the sales person (whom I have bought some goods off before) if any people had purchased any 50mm STMs yet. He replied not yet, but one customer had requested one put on hold, and they expected more people would come in on late night trading and the weekend.
Naturally I asked what price the store was selling for… and he indicated the price. Seeing as he knew I had bought goods there before (he looked me up on the system) he was able to work out a discount for me if I was interested (who wouldn’t be). I got a great deal which was equal to the lowest Aus ‘raw’ online price (without shipping) that I’ve seen. Naturally I prefer a bricks and mortar store – as they also have a great returns policy (that I’ve used in the past). The price I was given was cheaper than the current price of the old 50mm f/1.8 II in some other stores, so that’s a no-brainer! :
I have owned two copies of the 50mm f/1.8 II previously – back when I lived in Europe. I exchanged one (which had a consistent front focus issue). My 2nd copy of that lens was better, but AF accuracy was far from perfect. I was never happy with the inconsistent and inaccurate focus – this was my major ‘bug’ with that lens… on both copies I had owned, plus 2 other copies I have tried – one that I borrowed from a friend and 1 that I tried extensively in store.
In addition, I found the 50mm f/1.8 II’s bokeh was quite harsh (busy – and at times ugly at the critical transition points) and pentagon shaped when stopped down. While the image quality was sharp and contrasty (particularly between f2.8 and f8…) the lens just never really cut it for me, causing me more frustration than enjoyment. So seeing as these are systemic issues (and reading what others have written on the interweb with similar experiences about the 50mm f/1.8 II at the time) I eventually sold my 2nd copy (in Australia) – for $100 AUD some years ago.
Anyway… back to ‘now’ (ie early June 2015) – and the 50mm STM. I took about 20 to 30 sample photos using the 760D that was instore. I have only handled the 760D once previously, it’s not bad – but nowhere near as nice as my 7D. The 50mm STM’s focus was smooth, relatively quick, and quiet - but more importantly for me: it appeared to be very accurate.
I had read the technical details of the 50mm STM online before I was in store, as well as a few early reviews that sprung up. So I knew what I was getting. Seeing as the AF was clearly better, as well as the bokeh (7 circular blades vs 5 straight ones) – and a very mild IQ enhancement (a slight yet noticeably sharper and higher contrast wide open…). Plus I remember finding the 50mm f/1.8 II’s minimum focussing distance (MFD) of 45cm somewhat limiting, and I know from experience that a 35mm MFD making a substantial difference (improvement).
While I was surprised that Canon actually released this 50mm STM lens, it does not mean I am disappointed as such. (I was expecting more of a refresh to the current f/1.4, somewhere between f/1.4 and f/2 – USM and IS… like the 35mm f/2 USM IS…). But, as I considered that should Canon release such a ‘better’ 50mm sometime in the future, I could still sell my 50mm STM without much financial loss. For example if Canon releases an improved 50mm f/nooneknows USM IS after 1 or 2 years, the amount I sell for, would I expect, be a minimal amount to own the lens in that time, AND improve my appreciation, composition and skills with a fast 50mm on an APS-C (and potentially a FF in the future).
Therefore I decided to pull the plug, bite the bullet (and any another alliteration… do you see what I did just there) and buy this baby (my bank balance said ‘bonus’ too!)
I haven’t been disappointed
Having had my EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lens for a few weeks now, here are some notes (& comparisons to the nifty-fifty EF 50mm f/1.8 II) in summary paired with my 7D:
- Definitely much improved AF…
o slightly faster, with less hunting in low light / low contrast areas
o smoother & quieter (I don’t really need it STM for video, though handy to have available)
o most importantly accurate and consistent
- More pleasing, smoother bokeh (not top quality, but a notable improvement from my old 50mm II’s, particularly between f/2.2 and f/5.6)
- Closer minimum focal distance really appreciated
- Acceptable sharpness wide open across most of the frame (on APS-C)
- Very sharp between f/2.8 and f/8. Capable of extremely great IQ at these apertures
- Contrast between f/1.8 and f/2.2 benefits well from a little boost in post-processing (PP)
- CA’s visible at f/1.8 – but reduce fairly rapidly so by f/2.5 they are no longer there
- Vignetting wide open just noticeable on APS-C (looking forward to the DxO module to correct this and CA’s automatically)
- No apparent de-centring issue at this stage
- Required a AFMA of about -3 (this might not be the final figure… as I have not conducted final testing on this)
Looking forward to your comments, folks!
Paul
Please … let me share my little story of excitement with you all.
A few weeks ago I bought the 50mm STM. I was perhaps the first person in my city (Adelaide, South Australia) to get one. During my lunch break I went in to the largest camera store in Adelaide, to check if they had this lens. This store is also usually the first local bricks and mortar store to get new stock. Well, as it was, they had some arrive just the day before.
I asked the sales person (whom I have bought some goods off before) if any people had purchased any 50mm STMs yet. He replied not yet, but one customer had requested one put on hold, and they expected more people would come in on late night trading and the weekend.
Naturally I asked what price the store was selling for… and he indicated the price. Seeing as he knew I had bought goods there before (he looked me up on the system) he was able to work out a discount for me if I was interested (who wouldn’t be). I got a great deal which was equal to the lowest Aus ‘raw’ online price (without shipping) that I’ve seen. Naturally I prefer a bricks and mortar store – as they also have a great returns policy (that I’ve used in the past). The price I was given was cheaper than the current price of the old 50mm f/1.8 II in some other stores, so that’s a no-brainer! :
I have owned two copies of the 50mm f/1.8 II previously – back when I lived in Europe. I exchanged one (which had a consistent front focus issue). My 2nd copy of that lens was better, but AF accuracy was far from perfect. I was never happy with the inconsistent and inaccurate focus – this was my major ‘bug’ with that lens… on both copies I had owned, plus 2 other copies I have tried – one that I borrowed from a friend and 1 that I tried extensively in store.
In addition, I found the 50mm f/1.8 II’s bokeh was quite harsh (busy – and at times ugly at the critical transition points) and pentagon shaped when stopped down. While the image quality was sharp and contrasty (particularly between f2.8 and f8…) the lens just never really cut it for me, causing me more frustration than enjoyment. So seeing as these are systemic issues (and reading what others have written on the interweb with similar experiences about the 50mm f/1.8 II at the time) I eventually sold my 2nd copy (in Australia) – for $100 AUD some years ago.
Anyway… back to ‘now’ (ie early June 2015) – and the 50mm STM. I took about 20 to 30 sample photos using the 760D that was instore. I have only handled the 760D once previously, it’s not bad – but nowhere near as nice as my 7D. The 50mm STM’s focus was smooth, relatively quick, and quiet - but more importantly for me: it appeared to be very accurate.
I had read the technical details of the 50mm STM online before I was in store, as well as a few early reviews that sprung up. So I knew what I was getting. Seeing as the AF was clearly better, as well as the bokeh (7 circular blades vs 5 straight ones) – and a very mild IQ enhancement (a slight yet noticeably sharper and higher contrast wide open…). Plus I remember finding the 50mm f/1.8 II’s minimum focussing distance (MFD) of 45cm somewhat limiting, and I know from experience that a 35mm MFD making a substantial difference (improvement).
While I was surprised that Canon actually released this 50mm STM lens, it does not mean I am disappointed as such. (I was expecting more of a refresh to the current f/1.4, somewhere between f/1.4 and f/2 – USM and IS… like the 35mm f/2 USM IS…). But, as I considered that should Canon release such a ‘better’ 50mm sometime in the future, I could still sell my 50mm STM without much financial loss. For example if Canon releases an improved 50mm f/nooneknows USM IS after 1 or 2 years, the amount I sell for, would I expect, be a minimal amount to own the lens in that time, AND improve my appreciation, composition and skills with a fast 50mm on an APS-C (and potentially a FF in the future).
Therefore I decided to pull the plug, bite the bullet (and any another alliteration… do you see what I did just there) and buy this baby (my bank balance said ‘bonus’ too!)
I haven’t been disappointed
Having had my EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lens for a few weeks now, here are some notes (& comparisons to the nifty-fifty EF 50mm f/1.8 II) in summary paired with my 7D:
- Definitely much improved AF…
o slightly faster, with less hunting in low light / low contrast areas
o smoother & quieter (I don’t really need it STM for video, though handy to have available)
o most importantly accurate and consistent
- More pleasing, smoother bokeh (not top quality, but a notable improvement from my old 50mm II’s, particularly between f/2.2 and f/5.6)
- Closer minimum focal distance really appreciated
- Acceptable sharpness wide open across most of the frame (on APS-C)
- Very sharp between f/2.8 and f/8. Capable of extremely great IQ at these apertures
- Contrast between f/1.8 and f/2.2 benefits well from a little boost in post-processing (PP)
- CA’s visible at f/1.8 – but reduce fairly rapidly so by f/2.5 they are no longer there
- Vignetting wide open just noticeable on APS-C (looking forward to the DxO module to correct this and CA’s automatically)
- No apparent de-centring issue at this stage
- Required a AFMA of about -3 (this might not be the final figure… as I have not conducted final testing on this)
Looking forward to your comments, folks!
Paul
5DS, 5DS R, 1Ds mark III Studio comparison
Today I had an opportunity to participate on local Canon 5DS(R) presentation, play with production versions of both cameras and quickly compare to my 1Ds mark III.
I refused to do any outdoor comparisons and focused just on the studio shots (as there is lot of outdoor samples and RAW files in the wild already and the time was limited).
I've used Canon EF 2.8/100L Macro and Carl Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 ZE on all cameras. Files are processed in latest version of Capture One 8 (8.3.0.83). As the production RAW files probably slightly differ from preproduction samples, I refused to use included 5DS(R) profiles for C1 and used 1DsIII color profile with custom WB and adjusted all files to look as close as possible.
Default sharpening, chroma noise reduction down to 0, luminance 0, detail 100. Except adjusting WB and exposure to match on all images, no other adjustment was done.
As bonus, 5DS(R) JPEGs processed with latest DPP4 are included. I really do like the Fine Detail picture style and I hope, that my 1DsIII will be soon supported too in DPP4. DPP4 shows definitely better the differences in skin tones rendering between Canon and Zeiss lenses. I've applied DLO on EF 2.8/100L shots, to extract as much details as possible.
As there is currently not possible to process 1DsIII and 5DS(R) files in same version of Canon DPP, I processed the Planar shots with DPP3 and DPP4 with Standard picture style to compare the color rendering with Canon software.
Because the fullres 5DS(R) JPEGs are too big for my image hosting site, I offer only download of zipped full size JPEGs (~185MB).
http://www.mediafire.com/download/h47zsru133878xh/1DsIII_5DS_5DSR_Studio_Comparison_JPEG.zip
Because nobody cares about some other person JPEGs :, you can download RAW files too and play with them (~246MB, C1 and DPP4 settings included)
http://www.mediafire.com/download/q2a5f7qgnsb51su/1DsIII_5DS_5DSR_Studio_Comparison_RAW.zip
If you want to process the 5DS(R) files with DPP4, you need to download latest version 4.2.32.0, because the previous version 4.2.31.0 doesn't work with production RAWs.
File names are self explanatory and full EXIFs are included.
I do like the 5DS(R) output, it's very close to what I'm used to (1DsIII) and the resolution bump is significant. Unfortunately, I don't print bigger than A3, so I don't see a reason to upgrade anytime soon....
I refused to do any outdoor comparisons and focused just on the studio shots (as there is lot of outdoor samples and RAW files in the wild already and the time was limited).
I've used Canon EF 2.8/100L Macro and Carl Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 ZE on all cameras. Files are processed in latest version of Capture One 8 (8.3.0.83). As the production RAW files probably slightly differ from preproduction samples, I refused to use included 5DS(R) profiles for C1 and used 1DsIII color profile with custom WB and adjusted all files to look as close as possible.
Default sharpening, chroma noise reduction down to 0, luminance 0, detail 100. Except adjusting WB and exposure to match on all images, no other adjustment was done.
As bonus, 5DS(R) JPEGs processed with latest DPP4 are included. I really do like the Fine Detail picture style and I hope, that my 1DsIII will be soon supported too in DPP4. DPP4 shows definitely better the differences in skin tones rendering between Canon and Zeiss lenses. I've applied DLO on EF 2.8/100L shots, to extract as much details as possible.
As there is currently not possible to process 1DsIII and 5DS(R) files in same version of Canon DPP, I processed the Planar shots with DPP3 and DPP4 with Standard picture style to compare the color rendering with Canon software.
Because the fullres 5DS(R) JPEGs are too big for my image hosting site, I offer only download of zipped full size JPEGs (~185MB).
http://www.mediafire.com/download/h47zsru133878xh/1DsIII_5DS_5DSR_Studio_Comparison_JPEG.zip
Because nobody cares about some other person JPEGs :
, you can download RAW files too and play with them (~246MB, C1 and DPP4 settings included) http://www.mediafire.com/download/q2a5f7qgnsb51su/1DsIII_5DS_5DSR_Studio_Comparison_RAW.zip
If you want to process the 5DS(R) files with DPP4, you need to download latest version 4.2.32.0, because the previous version 4.2.31.0 doesn't work with production RAWs.
File names are self explanatory and full EXIFs are included.
I do like the 5DS(R) output, it's very close to what I'm used to (1DsIII) and the resolution bump is significant. Unfortunately, I don't print bigger than A3, so I don't see a reason to upgrade anytime soon....
Canon back to the drawingboard or is there still hope?
- By MxM
- Industry News
- 93 Replies
The industry has been shocked by the new A7(R)II series. Hasselblad and Nikon will adopt the new sensor, but what will be the answer from Canon?
- Back to the drawingboard? (Time issue)
- Not impressed, and release the new 5D(x)/1D(x) this year instead of 2016 (Otherwise Canon may/can/will lose some customers)
- Adopt the sensor and play the same game with Hasselblad and/or Nikon?
- Already lost this round
Anyway, Sony slapped the others in the face...
David vs Goliath anyone?
- Back to the drawingboard? (Time issue)
- Not impressed, and release the new 5D(x)/1D(x) this year instead of 2016 (Otherwise Canon may/can/will lose some customers)
- Adopt the sensor and play the same game with Hasselblad and/or Nikon?
- Already lost this round
Anyway, Sony slapped the others in the face...
David vs Goliath anyone?
Samyang releases Mark II's of Cine lenses
- By andrewflo
- Third Party Manufacturers
- 2 Replies
Looks like Samyang has released Mark II's of many of their Cine lenses according to their official website: http://www.syopt.com/en/product/cine.php
I haven't seen any kind of PR on this. Anyone have any more info?
I also noticed they released a Canon AE version of the 14mm f/2.8 (non-Cine) lens that has slowly started to make its way onto eBay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAMYANG-14mm-F2-8-ED-AS-IF-UMC-Lens-for-Canon-AE-Mount-/161730497014
I haven't seen any kind of PR on this. Anyone have any more info?
I also noticed they released a Canon AE version of the 14mm f/2.8 (non-Cine) lens that has slowly started to make its way onto eBay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAMYANG-14mm-F2-8-ED-AS-IF-UMC-Lens-for-Canon-AE-Mount-/161730497014
Colour or black and white?
Hi all. Decision to make. Colour or black and white? And ....... is this a keeper or .......? Thanks for looking and your comments!
Filter
Forum statistics
Gallery statistics
- Categories
- 1
- Albums
- 29
- Uploaded media
- 372
- Embedded media
- 1
- Comments
- 25
- Disk usage
- 1 GB