For techno geeks: Want to know why shutter is necessary for DSLR

I have Powershot A450 [CCD sensor] that seems does not have any shutter assembly.And it can capture up to 1/2000 sec.
Mobile cameras also do not have any physical shutter mechanism.

Why shutter assembly is necessary for a DSLR?

If that dslr can do without any physical shutter assembly it can definitely reduce cost, camera shake etc. etc.

techno geeks, please enlighten me

Just a mention of the 5D MK III is worth Money

Once I will buy you Canon 5D Mark III... this piece of paper has my boyfriend couple of weeks hanged on a wall. He is trying to save some money to buy new dslr. He saved almost the half of the price and recently all he had he invested into my ill teeths. After all of this, he put this paper on the wall and started to save money again. I`m trying to help him by selling this paper. Would you like to help? You can buy it. Thank you.




http://www.ebay.com/itm/Piece-of-paper-where-is-written-034-Once-I-Will-Buy-You-Canon-5D-034-/161390473735?pt=Digital_Cameras&hash=item25939f3207&nma=true&si=3GE0v05TcAdeZkPHqOM%252FGJfprNY%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

6d for filmmaking?

I currently own a Rebel t5i. I was new to DSLR cameras so I was advised to get the t5i but honestly I am not impressed with the video quality. No matter how I export my movies they come out grainy and the colors are washed out.

I want to upgrade to a better photo/video DSLR. I am interested in the Canon 6D. I have read it is a great camera but its main down fall is that it doesn't have continuous focus and it doesn't shoot RAW?. (of course I wish I could afford the 5d mkiii but that it not in my price range right now)

How good/bad is the 6D for film?

An introduction and a dilemma

Hello!

I'm new here and thought I'd introduce myself a bit before getting to my question.

TL;DR - I have $2800 to spend on equipment and need ideas.

I'm an almost 40 former IT engineer who has enjoyed photography since I was kid a with a Kodak 110 film camera. I got my first SLR in the 90s and my first DSLR was a Canon 10D.

I'm currently unemployed having gotten fed up with my former career and I also suffer from bipolar II disorder and chronic insomnia. Through the ups and downs, the one thing I still really enjoy photography. I like wildlife photography, although I'm limited by my equipment and I can't really afford to travel. I also enjoy taking candids of people at parties and such, though I don't think the life of a wedding or event photographer would be compatible with my struggles with anxiety and depression. I also enjoy taking pictures at local clubs where no flash photography is allowed, but my current equipment struggles in low light. My apartment has no windows exposed to light so it's hard to do much indoors. I'm not particularly skilled at landscape photography.

Lately I've felt like I'm in a creative slump. What I don't want to happen is to lose interest. I want to light the spark back up.

My current equipment (from when I had money to buy it):

EOS 7D
EF 100-400L
EF 24-105L
EF-S 10-22mm
EF 85mm f/1.8
430EX II

I recently went on an eBay spree and earned about $2800. I want to spend all of this on photography equipment. I don't have a lot of money, but one thing I do have is a lot of time. I could learn new things.

My biggest dissatisfaction with my current gear is the noise of the 7D. Whether I'm trying to take a picture of a blue heron, a indie musician, or a baseball player at a night game I'm always pumping up the ISO with the equipment I have and the noise and shadow banding is driving me nuts.

Do I keep the 7D and add a 6D? I think the inferior autofocus system would annoy me because I'm used to the advanced 7D.

Do I ditch the 7D and go 7D II? It's tough to say until people have it in their hands for reviews, but what I've seen so far seems better.

Do I go 5DIII? I admit this is a dream body for me. And I could do it with the current rebates, but that would be ALL I could do. But maybe that would be ok.

I also have no macro equipment. I admit the MP-E 65mm intrigues me, but I see so many horror stories about how hard it is to use (and I've done my research and understand the limitations of that particular lens). If I go with a standard macro, there's choices with the 100L, the 180L, and the Sigma. Then I get stuck trying to decide between the ring flash or the twin flash. Focus stacking seems like something I'd be interested in but again I worry that it's beyond me.

Astral photography would be interesting but it's tough to get away from light pollution here in Massachusetts.

A tilt-S___ lens could be fun to learn to use, but since I have a crop sensor body I don't know if that's a wise choice. I wouldn't be able to get much else with the price of those.


So, if you were me what would you do if $2800 (and possibly a little more, as I have more things to sell and birthday coming up) fell into your lap?

And yes, I know that only I can really know what I need, but since I'm feeling so stuck right now I'm looking for ideas to push me in the right direction.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks for reading if you made it this far!

Paul

High Megapixel Camera Development Announcement Mentioned Again [CR1]

HTML:
<p>Another mention of a development announcement for a high megapixel pro body from Canon coming in 2014. There were no specifications given, or a date that this could happen.</p>
<p><strong>CR’s Take

</strong>I’m still not convinced this isn’t a product of the previous posts on the topic being recycled, as well as Canon’s own mention of it. With all the hype surrounding the EOS 7D Mark II and the fact we won’t see the camera until November, I can’t see anything happening for a new DSLR before the EOS 7D Mark II comes to market.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

16-35 f4 IS vs 16-35 f2.8 II stopped down

Hi all

Any current 16-35 2.8 II owners recently switch to the f4 IS recently? It's pretty clear which one to get if you don't already own a wide angle zoom. I use my f 2.8 16-35 II on a tripod at f11 or higher almost all the time (and was pretty happy with that) and was wondering if in this circumstance I would see any significant difference. Having said that, when the price drops a bit I'll probably get the f4 too....

More chatter on an EF 11-24 F/4L coming soon

I don't put too much stock into CanonWatch, but they are claiming to have a source saying that an EF 11-24 F/4L lens is happening:

http://www.canonwatch.com/ef-11-24mm-f4l-coming-probably/

Some of you in a recent poll implied that this forum community's desire for a Nikon 14-24 F/2.8 clone was less based on that lens's spectacular sharpness and more based on the opportunity the 14mm wide end on that zoom might offer. So I'd imagine -- were this rumor true -- some folks would be super duper happy about this.

But even if this picture was not a fake, no front filterability (without a comically large aftermarket outrigger) would be DOA for me. I'll happily enjoy my 16-35 F/4L IS and call my UWA needs sated.

- A

Nikon 20mm f/1.8

Well, once again Nikon is ahead of Canon in offering modern upgraded lenses, like the 35/2, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 55/1.4, 85, 16-34/4 etc etc etc etc. And now it's this great looking 20/1.8. What a great astro photography lens, not to mention landscapes.

Go shoot Nikon, you say. I don't want to. I like my 6D and 70-200/4is. I just wish they'd make a 20 like this Nikon.

Upgrading - What To Expect

After a magnificent 2.5 years spent with my amazing EOS 500D, I will be upgrading to the 7Dii when it launches.

I've taken a few decent to good pics with the 500D but my growth as a photographer meant that I needed something a little bit more advanced for what I would like to shoot, namely birds in flight and wildlife in general and the 7Dii definitely has what I'm looking for.

ITR. 65 points. Advanced AF modes. 10fps. Intelligent viewfinder. Up, down, left, right. Tracking sensitivity. Lens group designations... Uhm, wow! All of a sudden, upgrading seems rather daunting.

I just got done reading a post on Facebook where somebody upgraded from a 650D to a 7D about 3 months ago but is finding his pics from his 650D sharper. The lenses were calibrated against both bodies yet the results stay the same.

Can an upgrade of this nature be too much for some photographers?

Regarding an upgrade of this magnitude, what would you folks see as being the three most difficult to grasp features?

siggy 35 1.4 Art

Alright, I am in either GAS mode or GAS prevention mode...lol. Renting the Art lens for for a week and a half. Moist say this lens rocks, a little worried about some of the focus issues others have had (which i guess is more prevalent in the 50mm?). So there ya go, I'll have it from the 3rd-13th. It will see 2 weddings, 1 engagement shoot and 1 senior session --- so that should be a pretty solid test!!!!

Samyang 85mm 1.4 with chip, focus issues. How to?

Hello everyone,

I recently bought this lens with the chip installed and I'm having big problem focusing.
Most of the time taking a photo with the AF confirm delivers me out of focus images, this is really frustrating and I was wondering if there is a way to disable the AF from the menu to really focus just with the lens or a if you have a definitive solution for taking photos with this gorgeous lens.

I really don't want to sell it but if I can find a trick or solution I will have to.

Thank you

Next Rebel Going EVF? [CR1]

HTML:
<p>The next Rebel, apparently coming in Q2 of 2015 will be the first Canon DSLR to use a electronic viewfinder. The camera will also feature the 70D’s 20mp sensor that uses split pixel technology and also feature DIGIC 6 like most of the new cameras. This combination of technologies would raise the bar considerably as far as image quality goes in the Rebel line.</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_750D.html" target="_blank">NL</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p> </p>

How does the Canon 16-35/4 compare with the Zeiss Distagon 21/2.8?

I know those lens are much more different than they are alike, but i think they both excel at landscape photography. Is there any IQ difference at comparable focal lenghts and apertures? I would use either one of the lens for landscapes and long exposures, so IS isn't very appealing to me, and i already have the Sigma 35/1.4, which i love, so i don't need the zoom coverage at the longer focal lengths. Going ultra-wide at 16mm would be nice, though, but the faster Zeiss could get me started in night landscapes/starfields photography. Is there any of you that used/tried both?

Should i get the 7D MKII?

Hello everyone,
Im new to the photography community "almost 2 yrs" and I am currently shooting with a Rebel T3i. I would like to upgrade to either get the new 7D MKII or just get the original 7D? I am no pro of any type. I just love to take pictures. I do quite a bit of landscape. I love street photography as well. Just your thoughts if I should get the MKII or just get the original 7D? Any feedback would be great. Thanks

7D Mark II AF Points Lighted??

I was wondering if Canon has been able to fix the AF point illumination in the 7D to allow the selected points to remain on permanently. This is one of the big weak points in my 5D MK III. The original 7D had fewer AF points, and they were easier to see. Now, with 75 AF points, I'd think that continuous illumination would be a requirement.

Apparently, Canon has been unable to solve the issue, the AF points only flash briefly when you press a button assigned to that function, or when AF has been achieved.

Since I use my 5D MK III in near darkness, its a pain to try and get the focus point on the subject, and often takes a couple of tries.

Below is what I found on a canon web site. I added the red highlight. The AF first just to determine if your focus point is on the subject is a trial and error process, and with 75 points, I'd think it would be difficult to do if a subject is moving.

Viewfinder illumination
Information on the focus screen can be set to illuminate briefly in certain conditions for better viewing in low light. This is actually set in the EOS 7D Mark II’s AF menu: 5th AF menu screen > VF display illumination:
Auto
Red illumination of AF points, Grid Lines, or any other viewfinder info on the focus screen when the camera detects low-light conditions (there’s no way to change the factory-set cut-off point for illuminating vs. not illuminating).
  • Enable (ON)
    Red illumination is always active, regardless of ambient light level. Illumination is limited to when AF is actually being activated; it does not simply constantly illuminate.
  • Off
    No illumination of viewfinder info that’s over the focus screen, regardless of ambient light level.
An important aspect of viewfinder illumination in the EOS 7D Mark II is that if active, it’ll appear differently in One-Shot AF vs. AI Servo AF. In One-Shot AF, when you press whichever button activates AF, it’ll flash briefly upon completion of AF, so you can visually confirm which point(s) are active and where they fall in the scene. In AI Servo AF, it behaves like the EOS-1D X with version 2.0 or higher firmware installed — during continuous AI Servo focus-tracking, the red illumination flashes on every second or so, briefly, then goes off. Again, there’s no way to have it simply illuminate constantly, regardless of the light level.
What about if you’re using Manual focus? If you’ve got the lens set to MF and press actively on whichever button would have been your AF activation button, you’ll get focus confirmation in the viewfinder when you do achieve sharp focus and the red illumination will flash briefly (as in One-Shot AF) when that happens. But again, it won’t illuminate continuously, even if the menu for illumination is set to ON.

Financial Times - "Digital cameras: out of focus"

Tuesday's U.S. edition of the Financial Times newspaper has an article entitled "Digital cameras: out of focus". It describes, from a business perspective, the status of digital cameras vis-a-vis smartphones with digital imaging ability. The FT reports analysis by Nomura Securities that the number of digital cameras sold by makers such as Canon and Nikon have fallen by 60 per cent. in the past two years. Shipments of digital cameras with built-in lenses were (in thousands) 108,577 in 2010; 77,981 in 2012; and estimated 26,480 in 2014. Shipments of interchangeable lens digital cameras were (in thousands) 12,887 in 2010; 20,157 in 2012; and estimated 12,543 in 2014.

Apparently this is worse news for Nikon than for Canon. Reportedly, digital cameras represent two-thirds of Nikon's group sales and all of its operating profits. For Canon, cameras are one-quarter of revenue, and Canon's office division provides cash flow.

So sales of premium DSLR's are holding up better than sales of digital cameras with built-in lenses, but the article notes that as smartphones incorporate higher quality lenses [and sensors] the camera makers risk losing the camera enthusiasts, too.

The article lists the 2013 world market shares (%) of all cameras by global brand owner:

Canon 23.1
Nikon 16.8
Fuji Photo Film 11.4
Sony 10.6
Samsung 7.6
Panasonic 7.2
Olympus 6.1
Kodak Alaris 4.2
Casio Computer 1.7
Ricoh Imaging 0.6

Financial Times, Tuesday 30 September 2014, p. 14.

6D plus Selphy CP910 for event printing

Has anyone tried printing directly from a 6D to a Canon Selphy CP910 dye-sub printer over WiFi? I'm considering picking one up for an upcoming Halloween event at our local zoo, and I was wondering how smoothly these two work together for real-time printing. Particularly, 1) how long it takes to transmit JPEG photos to the printer, and 2) whether the camera is tied up during the entire 50-60sec printing process after transmission. I can't seem to find any of these details in the manuals or a Google search. They warn you not to interrupt the transfer or you will get corrupted images, but they don't describe timing or buffering.

For background, we set up a photo shoot for kids in costume last year, and sold 4x6 prints as part of a fund-raiser. I set up WiFi pairing between my 6D and a laptop running the WFT pairing utility, EOS Utility and Lightroom, so JPEGs were automatically sent to the computer over WiFi as I shot, and had an assistant printing to an older Selphy over USB. I'd love to drop out the computer piece and print directly from the camera if that is practical. BUT I don't want to stand around like a goof for 2 minutes after sending each print job either.

Experiences appreciated. It's cheap enough I may just try it, but thought I'd ask.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,621
Members
24,805
Latest member
track inspector

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB