Genuinely intrigued: can you name a beautiful camera, please?
IMO, there are Fuji's that are close.
Upvote
0
Genuinely intrigued: can you name a beautiful camera, please?
more like "the baby being fed 5 years late" ...
and if EOS R indeed has no IBIS ... the crying will start in earnest.
Why? Nikon Z seems very similar to me. A new FF mount that requires an adapter to use existing lenses. Why would Z be dead?
Considering that the 6D Mark II MSRP is 2600 USD I would be very surprised if this one is under 2k.
Yep - and I usually know where I am anyway...
(I truly don't get the "need" for GPS in a camera...)
Looks quite beautiful to me.It’s by far one of the ugliest cameras in existence but I’ll remain optimistic for the specs.
IMO, there are Fuji's that are close.
I disagree. Fuji is just functional, not beautiful. Canon designers manage to do both functional and beautiful at the same time.IMO, there are Fuji's that are close.
Battery: LP-E6N !!
If the camera is good enough to be used a second body for weddings I like that i won't have to carry a different battery type from my 5 series
From your scaling, I would have to say that the R has the most “wrapped finger” space of your examples. Did not expect that!I've scaled the R's hotshoe to 5D/80D's and aligned backs. (It's probably not pixel-perfect.)
View attachment 180053
Would have liked to see the M50 in there as well. Strictly for size comparison with the new mirrorless.I've scaled the R's hotshoe to 5D/80D's and aligned backs. (It's probably not pixel-perfect.)
View attachment 180053
Do catch up, people. It's not long but it's a damn linebacker diametrically -- odds of fitting in your standard 80mm lens slot in your bag are officially zero.
Surely heavy as hell to boot. I'm geeked about the prospect of it, but I'm also wincing at the high 'reality price' that physics demands we pay for this.
- A
What purpose would it serve?Did anyone notice the lack of DoF preview button?
Via touch Display, like in the M50. I love that feature.quite some changes to the entire control layout ... but how could this slider bar replace (for example) the af-selector joystick? there is no vertical control
Why? Nikon Z seems very similar to me. A new FF mount that requires an adapter to use existing lenses. Why would Z be dead?
and I would say dream on, the 30.3 MP sensor they have inside the R is probably a refined version of the same sensor from the 5D Mark IV. All things being equal, I doubt Canon will polish a sensor from a $3500 body and then offer it for $1900. Not to mention the R&D that went into the rest of the various systems (AF, metering, new mount, etc...)The world doesn't work like that.
Agree, but we haven't seen all the specs yet. The Z7 is trying to be a D850 mirrorless and might fool some, but it's shackled with fine print and limitations. It's possible we've got a 5D4-like sensor here in a sealed body, but it has:
1/4000 shutter
Did anyone notice the lack of DoF preview button?
People aren't referring to the kit price, they are referring to the US body only price.
Just a small note but the top screen says 8000 in all pictures, so hopefully not just 1/4000 shutter
- 1/4000 shutter
- 5 fps with everything turned on (AF, AE each frame)
- No Eye AF from the M50
- 1 SD card
- 1/160 sync
- 4K but no DPAF to go with it
- No IBIS
- Not on-chip ADC like the 6D2
- No AF assist lamp compatibility with speedlites (Nikon Z did this for whatever reason)
Canon always seems to offer less for the money vs. its competitors.