Like I said and stand by - for the average stills photographer the video
capabilities of the R5 are fine. You're talking videography and making
movies etc. The average stills photographer doesn't do that - at least
none that I know.
With the advent of the 5D MkII, people started to ask about video
parallel to photo, and that increased every year. People want the
shallow depth of field and cost-effective production that modern
cameras with both stills und video capabilities offer.
I operate two professional rental studios, and for quite some time
we haven't seen a single production that doesn't have at least one
if not several social media teams along the photo team, and they
often use the same cameras so they can share lenses and accessories.
On top of the two studios, I have a rental business with more than
100,000 Ws studio flash and high end LED light from Dedo, Ledgo,
Nanlite, Aputure, Aladin. It is very likely that I know more professionals
than you do, and i see them working. The majority of my customers
uses one certain model camera for both stills and video, some have
a dedicated video camera on top. Their main camera today is always
one that can do both stills and video, and is used for both.
Now with brother Covid lurking around the corner, many people
resort to streaming or videomaking to make up for the losses in
live events and still be seen and heard. They use the camera at hand.
A camera that produces hard stops in a production due to
overheating is simply not state of the art anymore.