Just stack all those 18's you got laying about
Upvote
0
None of Canon's 1" sensor cameras have Dual Pixel Autofocus.None of their cameras with 1" sensors are their own, they are Sony's.
I understand both BSI and BSI/stacked are both more expensive sensor technologies so there could be a place for conventional sensors such as the R5 sensor in the market.Good to know that Canon developed and manufactured this sensor. I would expect all sensors going forward to be either BSI or BSI/stacked going forward.
It was never all of them but now that all of Canon's new camcorders have Canon sensors I am not sure why they can't do the same with point and shoots.None of their cameras with 1" sensors are their own, they are Sony's.
If the resolution is the most important thing for you then it probably isn't the camera for you!Who the F cares which company made the sensor. WTF is the resolution of the sensor? Every a**hole is telling us every stupid thing other than the most important information i.e. the resolution
For real, where did all those rumors come from?
Yepp! It is censored. We had a controversial discussion about that in January.Canon is *******!
Just had to get that out of the way.
edit: interesting, we can't say the d-word...not THAT d-word, the canon is d-word, d-word
[...] the internet went a bit silly with stories about who is actually manufacturing the image sensor [...]
What a relieve it's not us but the Internet to blame!Well, you know how the Internet works?
I believe it's a kind of a basic (herd-like) instinct. The same phenomenon can be observed in car industry (Toyota dared to design cars with BMW and Subaru, in basketball/soccer (to name a few) when players change teams leaving the fans in limbo, etc.).The reasoning is just ridiculous.
Toyota with BMW or Subaru is not the right analogy. In the BMW situation, Toyota outsourced parts to build their Supra. They had no design involvement from BMW. The Supra wasn't co-developed with BMW. The Z4 didn't have Toyota involvement. It's just Toyota being realistic and wanting to bring a sports car to market in an environment where sports cars don't make economic sense. So instead of spending hundreds of millions making an inline-6 engine, just pick from the many inline-6 engines that BMW makes. The Supra literally has BMW parts inside of it. In terms of the Toyota 86 versus Subaru BR-Z, there was true cooperation and co-designing with intermingling of parts from both companies.I believe it's a kind of a basic (herd-like) instinct. The same phenomenon can be observed in car industry (Toyota dared to design cars with BMW and Subaru, in basketball/soccer (to name a few) when players change teams leaving the fans in limbo, etc.).
Oh how I hope this thing is expensive beyond my reach...If the fact that it has 1 series AF controls and more, it takes 1 series batteries, it has faster fps than the 1DX III, it takes durability to new levels for the R system, it has all the connection capabilities the 1DX III has when the 1DX III has a $700 dongle on its side, etc etc, then it is probably the camera for you.