TBH, I would count the R7 as the same generation as R6m2 or (not 100% correct) R5m2 (yet to be announced).
It would surprise me too, a follow-up to the R5 C would make more sense. We'll see if this post brings more clarity over the next week or so.
I hear your point, but let's be honest....the r7 just doesn't cut the mustard for serious wildlife shooters. Useless buffer, horrible rolling shutter and well..a questionable button layout. If they released a new crop with 32mp stacked sensor, that would eliminate rolling shutter, put a decent buffer rin and make it exactly the same body and button layout as the r5 it would be a market killer!
Well, I think ergonomics are a very personal thing. I could never get used to the R5 ergonomics and bailed on the camera after about 18 months. Nothing against its capabilities, I just didn't like using it.
No idea if I am on the right track of course. Just tossing around an idea. The 7d2 was considered a 'mini 1d' and the R7, while it does have some good features, could never be considered a 'mini R1'. But if they have decided to change tack and head down that route it may make sense given the R7 and R10 are pretty close in speed etc. They may decide to up market the next r7It IS (too) early. But then again R6 II was also unexpected early.
So if the rumor of three stacked sensor cameras are true, I'll also cross my fingers for an R7II
