Upvote
0
Am I right in assuming this rumour has no rating? Just a collection of the various tidbits? Or is it legit?
Sounds Nokishita has reported the same thing so I am assuming this is a CR4. I haven't seen so far Nokishita reported something and that did not happen but I am only following all these rumor site for probably 4 to 5 years. If anyone know an instance they are wrong plese pot it here to "adjust" people's expectations
I can not believe Canon managed to keep ALL of that such a secret until now. EOS R plus FIVE pieces of glass???? Holy crap sandwich! I hope the dual mount system is true!!!
Highly unlikey. I see them pull off all sorts of stunts but this seems too wild.Or it will come later so the price of early adoption will have to include at least one lens?
The lack of an IS designation on standard lenses suggests IBIS.
Don't think so. Canon don't usually rush things and the previous rumours indicating "only" three lenses for the biggest photography show always seemed a bit thin.Maybe this sort of announcement is to buck Z pre-orders for people who wanted a big-grip mirrorless camera?
They actually already have a PD-E1 in their catalog. https://www.precisionroller.com/levers-for-canon-pde1/details_69280.htmlPD-E1 suggests the camera can be powered with the USB adapter and charges the battery.
to be fair. Craig leaked the EOS R, the RF mount and 24(28)-70 F2.0, and the 50mm
the "M" probably means Macro. IS for Macro or what Canon calls Hybrid IS may still be useful with IBISOn the contrary. "RF 35mm f/1.8 M IS" - that implies there's no IBIS unfortunately, doesn' it? I'm disappointed. I was hoping to eventually buy it and mount my 24-70 on it and make it stabilised. The only faint hope is in that 'M'. What is it, 'M'? An RF-mount lens also mountable on EF-M? That doesn't add up.
The EF Macro lenses (100L and 24-70L and maybe others) have hybrid IS (at least I think that's what the called it), where it compensates for side-to-side movements as well as angular movements. I think the point being that a tiny side-to-side movement makes a big difference when you're viewing a tiny object at a huge scale, but only makes a tiny difference when viewing a normal object at a normal scale.
I guess perhaps it has angular in-body stabilisation, and the macro lenses add the side-to-side?
Total guess though!