gbchriste, I don't want to wade into the argument but agree that each person should work however they want to work.
I have used the exact same technique as you and got bizarre readings at the edge of the light - things like 11,000k as I said in my prior post. Thinking back (it's been many years) I probably underexposed the reference shots, possibly skewing the results.
One other thought not discussed here is that nature shooters rarely have any reliable white balance references to use in post. You can't click on a door frame, wall, sign, etc. when your photos are of trees, water, or wildlife
Since upgrading to a wide gamut monitor, I've noticed that I am noticing white balance more and more in my shots and frequently shoot my EZBalance or ColorChecker Passport for later reference in post (not for calibration in camera). The Passport is handy because it's smaller and has 3 levels of Warm and 3 levels of Cool patches you can click on as well if you're not happy with the neutral gray.
I have used the exact same technique as you and got bizarre readings at the edge of the light - things like 11,000k as I said in my prior post. Thinking back (it's been many years) I probably underexposed the reference shots, possibly skewing the results.
One other thought not discussed here is that nature shooters rarely have any reliable white balance references to use in post. You can't click on a door frame, wall, sign, etc. when your photos are of trees, water, or wildlife
Since upgrading to a wide gamut monitor, I've noticed that I am noticing white balance more and more in my shots and frequently shoot my EZBalance or ColorChecker Passport for later reference in post (not for calibration in camera). The Passport is handy because it's smaller and has 3 levels of Warm and 3 levels of Cool patches you can click on as well if you're not happy with the neutral gray.
Upvote
0