This does NOT seem anything with viewfinder abbreviation.raptor3x said:
It seems the sensitivity of the central focal point, capable of working with EV -2, which means something like the lighting of a nightclub.
Upvote
0
Bingo! New Canon 5Ds has 50.6 MP new rumored specs
- Thread starter pedro
- Start date
It seems the sensitivity of the central focal point, capable of working with EV -2, which means something like the lighting of a nightclub.
Comparatively speaking, the 6D had -3 EV on center point. Means your camera can focus a lot more easily in the dark. Landscape shooting at night using AF for example.. the lower the number the easier it will be to grab focus
Upvote
0
Yeah, I`m sure the article is very reliable:xps said:
"According to Kenrockwell, which is the most reliable source and famous website for evaluating the camera and lens posted a live photo of Canon 5DS, it’s identical to pictures leaked on the Internet. "
LOL
Upvote
0
JS5 said:
A higher sync speed requires a physically faster shutter. Extending focus points to the edge is difficult on a full-frame because many lenses don't project a big enough image circle for the edge focus points to see through.
Upvote
0
"50.6mp full frame CMOS
53mp total resolution
"
???
" RAW (50MP), M-RAW (28MP), S-RAW (12.4MP)
Crop modes 1.3x and 1.6x
"
So which is it? The dumb mRAW,sRAW stuff that rob you of all reach for wildlife and don't give you the true quality of a real RAW file either or useful crop modes? Or, best of all, both?
"Continuous shooting 5 frames / sec"
In all modes? Did Canon a dumb one and NOT use cropped modes which maintain full reach and allow for faster fps and just use the silly mRAW and sRAW stuff that rob you of reach and don't allow for more fps???
Or is the info just incomplete?
The way Nikon does it make their bodies a LOT better for general usage, since you get slow speed for FF but then nice speed with nice reach for sports and wildlife with true cropped RAW.
Will Canon be obstinate and refuse to 'lose face' that their way makes less sense or not?
"Video 1920×1080 30fps (ALL-I or IPB)
"
Hello 2007!!!!!
And of course it won't even have the basic usability features of zebras or focusing aids or RAW historgram, etc. etc.
53mp total resolution
"
???
" RAW (50MP), M-RAW (28MP), S-RAW (12.4MP)
Crop modes 1.3x and 1.6x
"
So which is it? The dumb mRAW,sRAW stuff that rob you of all reach for wildlife and don't give you the true quality of a real RAW file either or useful crop modes? Or, best of all, both?
"Continuous shooting 5 frames / sec"
In all modes? Did Canon a dumb one and NOT use cropped modes which maintain full reach and allow for faster fps and just use the silly mRAW and sRAW stuff that rob you of reach and don't allow for more fps???
Or is the info just incomplete?
The way Nikon does it make their bodies a LOT better for general usage, since you get slow speed for FF but then nice speed with nice reach for sports and wildlife with true cropped RAW.
Will Canon be obstinate and refuse to 'lose face' that their way makes less sense or not?
"Video 1920×1080 30fps (ALL-I or IPB)
"
Hello 2007!!!!!
And of course it won't even have the basic usability features of zebras or focusing aids or RAW historgram, etc. etc.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
LetTheRightLensIn said:
All CMOS sensors have pixels that are masked out. This is often used for black point calibration.
Both. I'm sorry Canon is still using mraw and sraw despite the existence of the far-superior approach in the new DNG spec - lossy raw compression and/or downsampling.
Upvote
0
LetTheRightLensIn said:
Gee...I don't even have an HD TV yet. The only HD device in my house is my computer. I may buy a 4k device later this year, but it will be used as a computer monitor. I'm not planning to replace my CRT SD TVs at any point in the foreseeable future.
Upvote
0
LetTheRightLensIn said:
Guessing rumor misinterpretation. Time will tell. And obviously they are dilberately not tuning this for video use whatsoever to preserve the same price point for a 5D4, I'm betting.
Upvote
0
PureClassA said:
FF = 50.6MP
1.3 crop (really, 1.25 if it's like the 1D-1DIV) = 32.4MP
1.6 crop = 19.8MP
Since they don't match the mraw and sraw specs, I'm guessing it has full-frame mraw and sraw modes on top of the crop modes.
Upvote
0
Lee Jay said:
OK, well they phrased it weirdly since normally you'd say a 53MP FF sensor with 50.6MP actual resolution.
Yeah.
But it is really certain it has the true crop modes too and that it wasn't just a mistaken bit of info mixing up mRAW and sRAW with cropped modes?
I hope they are there and I hope they were like Nikon and give it a boost to 6-7fps in those modes.
Upvote
0
Lee Jay said:
1. You are in the extreme minority still using SD 4:3 CRT for movies/TV. (personally I've had HD1080P TV since early 2007 and HD1080 tuner for computer monitor since something like 2005)
2. even you say you are going 4k for a monitor later this year and that could certainly be used to view 4k no?
3. 4k allows for much better quality 1080P overall
4. 4k can act as a 2x TC for 1080P wildlife
5. 4k allows for panning in 1080P frame
beyond just not having 4k, it sounds like no zebras, focusing aids, raw historgram, no 1080p60, not even the (granted in many ways useless, at least from a quality standpoint) clean HDMI out, for all we know it might even have aliasing (so far only 1DX and 5D3 have provided video without bad aliasing from Canon)
Granted, if they the stills totlaly knocks it out of the park (exmor performance, 50MP, 6+ fps in cropped modes, etc.) the video could be forgiven (although still a shame and a major lost selling point that will cost Canon money one way or another) and the stills would be totally amazing.
Upvote
0
It is an improved 1D X metering system, the same in the 7D MkII, the 150000 pixels are divided into the 252 zones for a greater coverage. You can read more about it now in 7D Mk II reviews or Canon information pages.PureClassA said:
Upvote
0
