t3eye said:Not that I want to be pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised if it only had 4K in time lapse, like the 6D mark II.
I was initially worried they put one of their super 35 or 1" cinema camera sensors in the M50, but now I think time lapse makes more sense.
4K is something everybody claims they need desperately but only little percentage of customers actually use. I realise some people want it and it's fine, but I'm not vlogging and I don't care much about 4K.
I look into having a secondary lightweight backup camera, so I do care about dynamic range and the quality of optics I can potentially mount on it (I have good EF lenses). From a camera I expect something that makes it better than my phone, and it's the image quality.
So the DR will be crucial if I choose between 200D and this new 50M. If it has DR worse than 200D, I don't buy it.