Canon EOS R3 sensor resolution to be 45mp?

SteB1

EOS M6 Mark II
Feb 22, 2019
52
86
I like using Occam's razor i.e. the most likely explanation is the one that makes the fewest assumptions. I'd guess that Techradar's source of information is merely likely to be the old rumours that it would be a 45mp sensor, and they simply haven't kept up with the latest rumours. They did after all state "but rumors have strongly suggested that it’ll also be a 45MP camera", clearly stating that they were citing open rumours and not that they had any sort of special inside information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: john1970
Jul 20, 2021
1
5
Being a retired sportphotographer having covered 6 Olympic Games, I still have a number of friends working at the Tokyo Olympics. I asked one of them who is a dedicated Canon user, to try finding out regarding the R3 sensor from those down there that might know...
When my friend visited Canons pro service desk to have his gear cleaned today, he simply asked the service technician and got a straight simple answer back;
”The R3 have 45MP”

This of course can be false... but if a Canon Pro photographer asks another Canon Pro staff, wouldn’t it be more fair to simply say ”I can’t tell”, rather then giving professional a lie or a wild guess without saying so...?
 

CanonFanBoy

Purple
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,560
3,952
Irving, Texas
Being a retired sportphotographer having covered 6 Olympic Games, I still have a number of friends working at the Tokyo Olympics. I asked one of them who is a dedicated Canon user, to try finding out regarding the R3 sensor from those down there that might know...
When my friend visited Canons pro service desk to have his gear cleaned today, he simply asked the service technician and got a straight simple answer back;
”The R3 have 45MP”

This of course can be false... but if a Canon Pro photographer asks another Canon Pro staff, wouldn’t it be more fair to simply say ”I can’t tell”, rather then giving professional a lie or a wild guess without saying so...?
It's more fair to not ask and put pressure on people who "can't tell" to begin with. Unethical to pressure people to be unethical. Dang, couldn't your "pro" friend just pick up the cam and see for himself? Aren't they getting R3 loaners? Oh yeah, NDA.
 

unfocused

EOS-1D X Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
5,985
3,257
67
Springfield, IL
www.mgordoncommunications.com
Being a retired sportphotographer having covered 6 Olympic Games, I still have a number of friends working at the Tokyo Olympics. I asked one of them who is a dedicated Canon user, to try finding out regarding the R3 sensor from those down there that might know...
When my friend visited Canons pro service desk to have his gear cleaned today, he simply asked the service technician and got a straight simple answer back;
”The R3 have 45MP”

This of course can be false... but if a Canon Pro photographer asks another Canon Pro staff, wouldn’t it be more fair to simply say ”I can’t tell”, rather then giving professional a lie or a wild guess without saying so...?
Or the person thought he said R5.
 

tron

EOS R5
CR Pro
Nov 8, 2011
4,900
1,214
Just why? It's waste of space and weight when You can simply connect to your phone and get same result.
Not that practical. I do use my phone to connect but disconnections happen. Embedded GPS just like 5DMkIV and 7DMkII is an excellent solution that works always. Space and weight waste is practical zero.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pic

tron

EOS R5
CR Pro
Nov 8, 2011
4,900
1,214
Besides PBD's usage, I use wide angle CPLs to reduce reflections for waterfalls. Taking shots with and without but generally using the shot with CPL as looking through the water in pool of the waterfall (flat water not turbulent) is better than reflections. Reflections on wet rocks within the waterfall show up as harsh lighting.

Seascapes on rock shelves is another example. Use no CPL for cloud reflections on puddles on the rocks or ocean pools or CPL when you want to show what is in the rock pools. If it is overcast then there are no blue sky issues to use CPL for wide angle shots. If the skies are clear, there is no point to shoot a sunrise from my perspective :)
Thanks for answering. So many talks about polarizing filters brought to mind something different:

That I hadn't thought of bringing a polarizing filter for shooting some small amphibians! In the best case the water was so swallow that it practically didn't matter but that was stupid of me. I am not going there again most probably. I have a normal - not 4x4 - car and I drove about 18 kilometers (and then back) of a bumpy rocky road. So it could be a disaster (Initially I was thinking that word for the shooting but it can easily apply to driving too :D )

Interesting thing I have a polarizer (77mm ... I think!) but I do not bring it with me the last few years. That should change. It is small and light and can fit easily to the bag (...probably with a step ring too).
 

unfocused

EOS-1D X Mark III
Jul 20, 2010
5,985
3,257
67
Springfield, IL
www.mgordoncommunications.com
Could Canon have intentionally leaked wrong information? It would be a smart strategy to damage the reputation of rumor sites.
What possible benefit would there be for Canon to damage the reputation of rumor sites? These sites give them millions of dollars worth of free publicity every year. They aren't going to start feeding information to the sites, but they are happy to just ignore them and reap the benefits from the buzz these sites generate for the company.
 
Aug 7, 2018
210
170
What possible benefit would there be for Canon to damage the reputation of rumor sites? These sites give them millions of dollars worth of free publicity every year. They aren't going to start feeding information to the sites, but they are happy to just ignore them and reap the benefits from the buzz these sites generate for the company.
No company wants sites that leak information far ahead of an official announcement. They have a reason not to publish certain information, because their competitors could react and get an advantage. Imagine the R3 really has 45 megapixels, but Canon leaks information making Nikon believe that it only has 30 megapixels, but then in September the R3 is officially announced with 45 megapixels two months ahead of the Z9. As some people (not me) prefer 45 megapixels, that would be quite a coup for Canon. If Nikon had that information earlier, they might have announced the Z9 much sooner to compete with the R3.

The Pentagon uses that strategy quite a lot. They do everything to make it look like their really are aliens on Area 51. They even stop former employees from talking about anything they saw there. All just to make conspiracy theorists jump on that wagon and publish all that nonsense. If that same people really have something valid to report, nobody will trust them after all the reports about aliens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pic

tiggy@mac.com

R5
CR Pro
Jan 20, 2014
694
583
Thetford, VT
www.camnostic.com
Let's take a big(ish) data approach to this. When we start seeing the Olympics photos come in, let's compare the R3 shooters' images to those of the AP (who all will be shooting the hi rez Sony sensors). Do the AP images crop in more frequently than those of the others? There will be examples where photographer placement limitations will make this very desirable. Presumably they will be - on average - using the same focal lengths. If we see Sony images cropping in to 2/3 the linear side relative to the Canon, or a weird absence of equivalent shots with the Canon shooters when it would appear to be useful, then we could get some clues. At least some arguments.
 

neurorx

EOS 90D
May 12, 2015
153
96
If it is 45 mp, I would likely think it would eat into the R5 sales for stills shooters. I would think 30 mp would be the sweet spot.
 

CanonFanBoy

Purple
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,560
3,952
Irving, Texas
No company wants sites that leak information far ahead of an official announcement. They have a reason not to publish certain information, because their competitors could react and get an advantage. Imagine the R3 really has 45 megapixels, but Canon leaks information making Nikon believe that it only has 30 megapixels, but then in September the R3 is officially announced with 45 megapixels two months ahead of the Z9. As some people (not me) prefer 45 megapixels, that would be quite a coup for Canon. If Nikon had that information earlier, they might have announced the Z9 much sooner to compete with the R3.

The Pentagon uses that strategy quite a lot. They do everything to make it look like their really are aliens on Area 51. They even stop former employees from talking about anything they saw there. All just to make conspiracy theorists jump on that wagon and publish all that nonsense. If that same people really have something valid to report, nobody will trust them after all the reports about aliens.
Yeah, changing mfg procedures, processes, QC, packaging, literature, parts, etc... it ain't like asking Burger King to hold the mayo or add pickles. And yes, some companies use the press from rumor sites to leak info. Yup, they want it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unfocused

neuroanatomist

I post too Much on Here!!
CR Pro
Jul 21, 2010
25,014
2,937
If it is 45 mp, I would likely think it would eat into the R5 sales for stills shooters. I would think 30 mp would be the sweet spot.
Either way, Canon is selling a camera. To the extent that one model has a higher profit margin than the other, that matters but really not much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EOS 4 Life

bernie_king

EOS M6 Mark II
Jun 30, 2014
77
98
Would they mind? "Drn, we lost a $4000 R5 sale, but hay we sold a $6000 R3 instead!" With 30mp it is more likely they will loose the $6000 sale to people wanting higher MP.
I think it more likely they think that people like me will buy the 30mp R3 for action and the 45mp R5 for the stuff that needs Hi-Res. We should know soon. Of course, if the R3 is 45, I may just sell my R5 and buy 2 R3s. I'm kind of hoping for 30 myself, but 45 will work too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: john1970

David - Sydney

EOS R
CR Pro
Dec 7, 2014
819
683
www.flickr.com
Thanks for answering. So many talks about polarizing filters brought to mind something different:

That I hadn't thought of bringing a polarizing filter for shooting some small amphibians! In the best case the water was so swallow that it practically didn't matter but that was stupid of me. I am not going there again most probably. I have a normal - not 4x4 - car and I drove about 18 kilometers (and then back) of a bumpy rocky road. So it could be a disaster (Initially I was thinking that word for the shooting but it can easily apply to driving too :D )

Interesting thing I have a polarizer (77mm ... I think!) but I do not bring it with me the last few years. That should change. It is small and light and can fit easily to the bag (...probably with a step ring too).
There are shooting strategies (luminosity blending, multi-shot average blending etc) to simulate ND/grad ND filters but you can't replicate CPL in post. In essence, a CPL should be everyone's first filter but understanding when to use it takes time :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tron

pic

I'm New Here
Jul 17, 2021
10
2
Exactly what I do with my 7D MkII when on a trip, with one extra step ... when you want to it to stop (at the end of the day): pull the battery out of the body and charge if necessary :cool:
Obviouly charging batteries on a long trip is a mandatory evening task ;-)