Canon officially announces the EOS 90D and EOS M6 Mark II
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
So as I expected, the 1/16000 shutter speed is with electronic shutter, like in the original 1D. The soft shutter on the 80D is an interesting tidbit.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
no Dual SD Slots as expected, still will be getting this to replace my broken 500D. Wondering what buffer is for continuous shooting.
Edit: found the buffer depth and at best its unimpressive. Overall it does seem like Canon has done decent job of crippling this camera as well.
Edit: found the buffer depth and at best its unimpressive. Overall it does seem like Canon has done decent job of crippling this camera as well.
Attachments
Last edited:
Upvote
0
What a great camera, this EOS 90D. Now it's time to upgrade from my 400D which is starting to fall apart after 40.000 shots.
Finally, after years of waiting, the time has come.
Congratulations. As someone who upgraded from the 300D (which I bought the year it came out) to the 80D, I'm pretty sure you're going to love it.
Upvote
0
At least DPReview reports that they asked Canon about it and apparently the M62 is replacing both the M5 and the M6. A shame, really. I realize the M5/M6 division was always about experimenting which form factor ends up more popular, but I'd like to think that there exists room on the M line for an enthusiast model with an integrated viewfinder. (Also with a tilty-flippy screen while we're at it…)
Last edited:
Upvote
0
So the M6II has up to 14 fps shooting with full AF, but the 90D in Live View only does 7 fps with AF or 11 fps without. I wonder whence the difference, or if it's Just Canon Things
. With the DPAF tracking, I wonder if the M6II ends up being the one better suited for shooting action, at least in some cases 
. With the DPAF tracking, I wonder if the M6II ends up being the one better suited for shooting action, at least in some cases
Upvote
0
Bah, 32Mpix at 10fps is a lot of data to move, though I would have expected a larger difference between UHS-I and UHS-II cards. I expect the buffer flushing time to be noticeably faster with UHS-II, however.
Anyway, when shooting action I see no reason not to use C-RAW; the loss of information really is minimal. 39 C-RAWs at 10fps is quite impressive and should be enough for anyone considering this camera.
Upvote
0
1199$ for a camera that don't do 24fps 1080p video? what is this? 2008? hahaha!
When all its predecessors has it (70D, 80D, 77d, even the rebels) There is no excuse but to wanted crippling the camera.
Sad! I was really hoping to upgrade my 70D, but none the RP/90D do 24fps
When all its predecessors has it (70D, 80D, 77d, even the rebels) There is no excuse but to wanted crippling the camera.
Sad! I was really hoping to upgrade my 70D, but none the RP/90D do 24fps
Upvote
0
In practice, you don't right now, as Adobe's DNG Converter almost certainly doesn't support 90D RAWs yet.
Upvote
0
If this is true, then it is a bit surprising. I was expecting some product differentiation, e.g. that M5 II is going to get an IBIS, thinking Canon was not ready with the feature in time, so that's a reason M5 II will get released later. But if there is not going to be any M5 II, we are going to live without an IBIS the whole one iteration, which means few years.
Upvote
0
