Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark III Specifications [CR1]

[Sporgon]

Sounds like another Canonitis then...

sounds like an idiot speaking.

you can't expect to increase the sensor size, decrease size and weight and also at the same time expand / keep the lens the same.

the three just don't physically happen on this planet , possibly universe.

Maybe they do in an unreality bubble

That's my worry on the aps-c sized Powershot. If it's as big as say an M6 with kit lens then there's not as much point in it - unless the lens is faster and really stellar.

 

[bludragon]

Dimensions (W x H x D) of the G1x mkII: 4.58 x 2.91 x 2.61 in. / 116.3 x 74.0 x 66.2mm
(from https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/details/cameras/point-and-shoot/advanced-cameras/powershot-g1-x-mark-ii)

I have to assume the mkIII will not stray far from that.

That one had a 24–120mm f/2-f/3.9 lens with a 1.5in sensor.
The mkIII rumor/guess is a 24-120 f/2-f/5.6 with a slightly bigger aps-c sensor.

75mm is noticeably longer than 45 or 50mm.
A kit 15-45 f/3.5-f/6.3 or 16-50 f/3.5-5.6 is also a stop slower than the rumored lens for the G1x mkIII over equivalent range, so it's not a valid comparison.

 

[powershot2012]

Sorry you feel that way...again 3.5 years in the making, doesn't appear Canon has made much advancement.

Canonitis

Noun/Latin Origin
– To never go the full step you really need to innovate and take over the market.

Sounds like another Canonitis then...

sounds like an idiot speaking.

you can't expect to increase the sensor size, decrease size and weight and also at the same time expand / keep the lens the same.

the three just don't physically happen on this planet , possibly universe.

 

[Normalnorm]

If it has and EVF and decent build with a good buffer, I'm in.

I take for granted the lens will be OK and the sensor will be at least as good as today's.

The leaf shutter will make my day for my work.