SeanL said:Ok, I believe I'm seeing something nobody has posted here.
Go look at the closeup crop of the camera on EOSHD...do you see what I see?
zim said:SeanL said:Ok, I believe I'm seeing something nobody has posted here.
Go look at the closeup crop of the camera on EOSHD...do you see what I see?
The angle of the camera body to the lens looks strange, new TS
mmeerdam said:SeanL said:Ok, I believe I'm seeing something nobody has posted here.
Go look at the closeup crop of the camera on EOSHD...do you see what I see?
something that could be a tilting screen?
SeanL said:mmeerdam said:SeanL said:Ok, I believe I'm seeing something nobody has posted here.
Go look at the closeup crop of the camera on EOSHD...do you see what I see?
something that could be a tilting screen?
Good eye. I didn't notice that and it could be...or possibly an external screen on the rig?
mmeerdam said:SeanL said:mmeerdam said:SeanL said:Ok, I believe I'm seeing something nobody has posted here.
Go look at the closeup crop of the camera on EOSHD...do you see what I see?
something that could be a tilting screen?
Good eye. I didn't notice that and it could be...or possibly an external screen on the rig?
That would be a weird place for a part of a gimbal rig or an attachment such as a screen as it would make it hard to balance the gimbal setup. I came to the conslusion It's either jpg artifact/nothing or likely a tilt screen.
Edit:
Just googled a bit, seems to be the dji ronin with the red screws and the battery shape vertically. The Ronin doesn't have anything there. Also it seems lighter, as a reflective surface, It's lighter than any other black aprt where the sun hits.
Robert Mariani said:From my perspective, the MK IV needs:
36-40MP
Much better DR
Better low light focusing
Robert Mariani said:Anything less than 36MP and this guy is switching to Sony for portrait work and PhaseOne or Hassleblad for architectural work.
Robert Mariani said:Of all the specs presumed coming, it baffles me that the camera seems to be pegged at 24MP. The Nikon D810 is 36.3 MP with DR that crushes Canon. BTW I shoot a 5D MK II for my portrait work and 5DS R for my architectural photography.
Anything less than 36MP and this guy is switching to Sony for portrait work and PhaseOne or Hassleblad for architectural work.
From my perspective, the MK IV needs:
36-40MP
Much better DR
Better low light focusing
dilbert said:ahsanford said:Robert Mariani said:From my perspective, the MK IV needs:
36-40MP
Much better DR
Better low light focusing
I am highly confident you'll get one of those things.
One out of three is not a pass.
You can create an arbitrarily large and demanding set of criteria, and then assert that less than 100% "is not a pass." In the end, it's just a tool: for some it will serve their needs and they will buy it; for others it will not and they won't.dilbert said:ahsanford said:Robert Mariani said:From my perspective, the MK IV needs:
36-40MP
Much better DR
Better low light focusing
I am highly confident you'll get one of those things.
One out of three is not a pass.