There is some confusion because in photography, two different things are called "exposure".Please elaborate.
An exposure, as I understand it, is a collection of photons,
I think a lot of people are merging the "RS" and the "RX" bodies in their minds.Whatever the full pro version of the EOS R is.
Hoping for 36 MP BSI
IBIS
7+ FPS in all AF Scenarios
Don't really care for anything else.
I doubt that all that many sales are motivated specifically by the RF f2 zooms or the RF f1.2 primes. The top end RF lenses may be a factor for some, but I suspect that for most the decision is more motivated by the belief that the R or the RP delivers on the use cases that are important to them, along with the desire to start exploring Canon's FF mirrorless equipment.We definitely don't need to disparage somebody for buying the R, as some of the posts here seem to be doing. (That said, when somebody for months declares they have all the gear they need, their wife won't let them buy more, they don't have the money...And then suddenly goes all in on the R and lenses, a little good natured teasing seems inevitable. And deserved!)
But how many enthusiastic photographers would be buying the R body if not for the rf 50mm f/1.2L, the massive 28-70mm f/2L, or the newest 85mm 1.2L? A few, I suppose, but harder to understand if a 5DIV or something similar is already in the gear bag.
If somebody is intrigued by the R, wants the lenses RIGHT NOW, or just thinks the R is the future, forget about legacy EF, enjoy, do the early adopter necessities for the rest of us, and please start sharing more samples!![]()
Thank you!Amazing that people still don’t have a clue about equivalence. Not a dig at you, just a rebuttal against your very misplaced comment, I’d hate people to think it’s true.
Amazing that people still don’t have a clue about equivalence. Not a dig at you, just a rebuttal against your very misplaced comment, I’d hate people to think it’s true.
Isn’t it fun when people don’t understand the trade offs, but also don’t even bother to question the fact that having choices is generally better than not having them?Amazing that people still don’t have a clue about equivalence. Not a dig at you, just a rebuttal against your very misplaced comment, I’d hate people to think it’s true.
Whatever the full pro version of the EOS R is.
Hoping for 36 MP BSI
IBIS
7+ FPS in all AF Scenarios
Don't really care for anything else.
Absolutely agree. I ran 1.6x crop and Full frame along side each other for a number of years. So I could lever the advantages of both. The 1.6x crop stuff is lighter and generally smaller for the same equivalence and that's a consideration too. The Full frame stuff is generally brighter with less reach...but that is mostly seen in the low light abilities and Iso values.Isn’t it fun when people don’t understand the trade offs, but also don’t even bother to question the fact that having choices is generally better than not having them?
WOWAre we ******* now, or not yet?https://www.dpreview.com/news/7747501993/sony-introduces-a7r-iv
Dual UHS II slots and improved grip (ergonomics) are also mentioned ....
- World's First 35mm Full-Frame 61.0 MP Image Sensor
- 15-stop Enhanced Dynamic Range
- 5-axis Optical In-body Image Stabilization
- 10 fps Shooting with Full AF / AE Tracking
- 567 Phase-detection AF Points, 74% Coverage
- Real-time Eye AF for Still / Movie / Human / Animal
- Real-time Tracking
- 5.76 million dot UXGA OLED Viewfinder
- Upgraded Connectivity and Operability
- 4K Movie Recording, S-Log 2/3, HDR
- Upgraded Dust and Moisture Resistance
Are we ******* now, or not yet?https://www.dpreview.com/news/7747501993/sony-introduces-a7r-iv
Dual UHS II slots and improved grip (ergonomics) are also mentioned ....
- World's First 35mm Full-Frame 61.0 MP Image Sensor
- 15-stop Enhanced Dynamic Range
- 5-axis Optical In-body Image Stabilization
- 10 fps Shooting with Full AF / AE Tracking
- 567 Phase-detection AF Points, 74% Coverage
- Real-time Eye AF for Still / Movie / Human / Animal
- Real-time Tracking
- 5.76 million dot UXGA OLED Viewfinder
- Upgraded Connectivity and Operability
- 4K Movie Recording, S-Log 2/3, HDR
- Upgraded Dust and Moisture Resistance
I think a lot of people are merging the "RS" and the "RX" bodies in their minds.
I would not expect the "RX" to have 36MP. I would not be at all surprised if it has the same or similar MP as the "R," but with a higher frame rate, autofocus improvements, more robust build, 1D battery, etc., that differentiates the 1 series from the 5 series in DSLRs. It will probably share the same sensor as the 1DX III. Simply moving from 20 to 30 mp would be an impressive leap.
The "RS" is almost certainly going to exceed the 50 mp of the 5D s.
I also expect that the "RS" will have IBIS, but I'm not counting on the "RX" having it. Canon may not feel comfortable putting IBIS in a body that has to be bombproof.
Yes, samples, good point, here are a few with the RP and RF 24-105 or EF 35 2.0 IS w/ adapter (Lightroom Classic, no editing)We definitely don't need to disparage somebody for buying the R, as some of the posts here seem to be doing. (That said, when somebody for months declares they have all the gear they need, their wife won't let them buy more, they don't have the money...And then suddenly goes all in on the R and lenses, a little good natured teasing seems inevitable. And deserved!)
But how many enthusiastic photographers would be buying the R body if not for the rf 50mm f/1.2L, the massive 28-70mm f/2L, or the newest 85mm 1.2L? A few, I suppose, but harder to understand if a 5DIV or something similar is already in the gear bag.
If somebody is intrigued by the R, wants the lenses RIGHT NOW, or just thinks the R is the future, forget about legacy EF, enjoy, do the early adopter necessities for the rest of us, and please start sharing more samples!![]()
My expectation/hope is that the RS will exceed the 5D4's frame rate at full resolution. The 5D4 is, honestly, pretty slow by current standards. I wouldn't expect it to top 10fps at 60mp or anything, but 8fps would be 480mp/s, in the ballpark as the 420mp/s of the A7R3, which is coming up on 2 years old. An A7R4 will likely bump that up as well. Canon would really have to push the MP count to the stratosphere (75+?) in order to justify a 7fps frame rate on a mirrorless in 2020.
Other than FPS, I don't know what an "R5" would offer over an RS, and the 5D4 is already fast enough for most event work. Anything faster, and you'l be in RX territory. I think the base "R" series will become the "all-rounder" when it hits mk2 (and as it's a first-gen product, I'm certainly hoping for a faster-than normal refresh cycle)
why do you think so?! Look at the prices of XQD and the monopol by Sony... it would be logical, but now its better for us (the Sony photographers). SD is far cheaper and Sony has also the fastes (r+w) on the market if someone needs the speed of "300/300mb/s".I'm shocked that Sony opted for Dual UHS II slots and not XQD. Seems like a pretty large miss.