High ISO Samples from the Canon EOS 7D Mark II

[Canon Rumors]

<p>Matt Granger has posted some high ISO samples from the brand new Canon EOS 7D Mark II. You can <a href="http://mattgranger.com/7d2" target="_blank">check out the samples at MattGranger.com</a></p>
<div id="attachment_17376" style="width: 585px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/7d2isohigh.jpg"><img class="wp-image-17376 size-medium" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/7d2isohigh-575x383.jpg" alt="7d2isohigh" width="575" height="383" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for Larger</p></div>
<p><strong>Canon EOS 7D Mark II $1799: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1081808-REG/canon_9128b002_eos_7d_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICA7DM2.html?KBID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=4IHYPE3ZKJN5VL4X" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.cameracanada.com/enet-cart/product.asp?pid=7dmarkii" target="_blank">Camera Canada</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

 

[DiSnapper]

Amazing, atlease when compared to my 7D. The amount of grain at 51200 is same as what my camera gives me at 400. Good start for 7D ii. Looking forward for more reviews.

 

[Quest for Light]

Amazing, atlease when compared to my 7D. The amount of grain at 51200 is same as what my camera gives me at 400. Good start for 7D ii. Looking forward for more reviews.

aha

 

[adhocphotographer]

WOW... that does look good... but if it had not been a major ISO improvement, it was going to be a dud!

Makes me think "what will the 1dxII/5dIV be like"? good times

 

[ewg963]

Looks good...

 

[Quest for Light]

well i normaly don´t judge from resized JPG images.

but i doubt that 51200 on the 7D MK2 looks as grainy as ISO 400 on a 7D.

i guess his 7D has some major issues if that´s true. :

 

[DiSnapper]

well i normaly don´t judge from resized JPG images.

but i doubt that 51200 on the 7D MK2 looks as grainy as ISO 400 on a 7D.

i guess his 7D has some major issues if that´s true. :

I am not sure of other 7Ds but the one am using have this issue along with inaccurate AF.

 

[Quest for Light]

well i normaly don´t judge from resized JPG images.

but i doubt that 51200 on the 7D MK2 looks as grainy as ISO 400 on a 7D.

i guess his 7D has some major issues if that´s true. :

I am not sure of other 7Ds but the one am using have this issue along with inaccurate AF.

you tell me your 7D at ISO 400 looks like this:

are you sure it´s not a Casio Z50 you are talking about? ??? ;D

 

[kevl]

The ISO performance looks impressive for an APS-C.

BUT WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE FOCUS? Out of 5 frames two are completely out of focus and one is focused on the wrong eye. Was he drunk or is the focus really not very good?

 

[vlim]

it looks really realy good at 6400 iso which would be great for an apsc body !

 

[steliosk]

JPEG from camera with noise reduction filters
downsized to 2 megapixels from 20
and the conclusion is HIGH ISO KING :

i doubt if high iso RAW files are gonna be any better than 7D 1

 

[hemanthforcanonrumors]

Wow, awsome. I had posted in another thread tht i would be very happy if I could get a clean noiseless image at 6400 ISO speed. I see that at 12,800 ISO this still gives a super image absolutely.. Not able to wait for 7D2 to be in my hands soon.

7D was good upto ISO 1000 or may be a stop over it max. but nothing above that. But under low light situations, i have used 5d3, and i have take so many images between ISO 6400 and ISO 8000, it results in an absolute stunning quality with absolutely no noise at all. So, with 7D2 all that have changed again compared to 7D.. no need for any extensive usage of an additional noise removal software's.

 

[Quest for Light]

Wow, awsome. I had posted in another thread tht i would be very happy if I could get a clean noiseless image at 6400 ISO speed. I see that at 12,800 ISO this still gives a super image absolutely.. Not able to wait for 7D2 to be in my hands soon.

7D was good upto ISO 1000 or may be a stop over it max. but nothing above that. But under low light situations, i have used 5d3, and i have take so many images between ISO 6400 and ISO 8000, it results in an absolute stunning quality with absolutely no noise at all. So, with 7D2 all that have changed again compared to 7D.. no need for any extensive usage of an additional noise removal software's.

and it would be even better if he had resized to 500x333 pixel. 8)

 

[Vikmnilu]

The web is already suffering from high number of clicks..... I wonder if it is a result of GAS

Seems that people were really looking forward to this! Understandable! And hope it copes with the noise.

 

[Memdroid]

Wow that guy really got it together. Different exposures on almost all the the samples and misfocused too! He seriously published this as a "test", what a joke!

But the ISO performance seems really good for an APS-C body, impressed!. I wish he uploaded the the full res files instead.

 

[martinslade]

Here are some much larger jpegs to check out: http://www.cameraegg.org/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-sample-images-movies/

 

[AlanF]

Amazing, atlease when compared to my 7D. The amount of grain at 51200 is same as what my camera gives me at 400. Good start for 7D ii. Looking forward for more reviews.

7 stops of improvement! Proves Neuro has been wrong all along about the laws of physics.

 

[Quest for Light]

Wow that guy really got it together. Different exposures on almost all the the samples and misfocused too! He seriously published this as a "test", what a joke!

ken r. younger brother i guess... :

 

[Joe M]

I realize that everyone is anxious for some output from the camera to back up what some consider an improved version and others a warm-over. The output is what matters. But could CR please link to some meaningful examples? While I'm not considering purchasing this camera, it's still interesting to see what technology Canon is bringing to the table and I am not anxious but would still love to see examples once they arrive. These oof downsized pics are of very little use. I guess a lot of people want to be first out of the gate with some reviews so that google and the rest of the world will hit their sites but really, if you're going to put something out there (MG), could you put a little effort into it? In any case, with opinions varying widely, I'll take the "seems like a meaningful update to the camera" stance. Although, the oof shots by MG don't bode well for the new fancy AF abilities. I'll chalk that up to user error for now and I look forward to reviews by reputable sites.

 

[PhotoCat]

Downsizing the pic is a known technique for noise reduction and therefore I wouldn't read too much
into the downsized sample pics for 7D2's noise performance.
It would be a ground breaking sensor achievement if Canon
can deliver a mere 1 stop of ISO improvement over 7D on raw pics.
Yet you don't see any new sensor technology mentioned in the announcement other than
the already known dual pixel technology which has very little, if any, to do with high ISO noise performance.

I am guessing the real ISO improvement, if any, would be anything less then 0.75 stop.