New EF-S Ultrawide Coming? [CR1]

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,628
5,441
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16458"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=16458">Tweet</a></div>
<p>We’ve been told from a couple of different places that a new ultra-wide angle lens for APS-C is coming this year. It would be a replacement to the very good EF-S 10-22 f/3.5-4.5. I wasn’t told exactly what the new lens would be.</p>
<p>If I had to speculate, I think it would be a constant aperture f/4 lens with IS. If the lens was released for the EOS 7D replacement, perhaps we would also see a build quality bump with something like weather sealing. Just because they’ve never done it for EF-S, doesn’t mean they couldn’t start now.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
 
Utterly ridiculous. Bring on the 7d II, we've got enough glass.
Or rather bring on a killer eos-m 3 and we will just use the really good and compact cheapo ef-m 11-22 which has IS already, although canon was so stupid to not make it constant aperture f/4.0.

Just do it, Canon. So sick and tired of rumors and marketing-differentiated, crippled products. Up yours, canon!
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Geez people. Chill. It's a CR1 rumor. Some people will use any excuse to rail against Canon.

If you are not interested in this lens, that's fine. I'm not interested either. But why get upset about it. It doesn't affect you one bit.

Oh wait, it does...If Canon releases any lens that adds to its bottom line, it increases the resources available to invest in other products – products that you might be interested in.
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
2n10 said:
tron said:
thepancakeman said:
tron said:
Stupid rumor. Sorry I cannot believe it.

C'mon man, it is the year of the lens; this might be THE lens! :D
Still it is even more stupid than other rumors ;)

Just because it is not a lens you want?
No just because the existing one is a very good lens.
and look at all those series 1 big whites that were replaced by even better series 2 big whites..... They were all good lenses and got replaced and nobody is complaining about it.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the people designing lenses are a different team than those designing bodies.... What one team does does not substantially affect the other team.
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
2n10 said:
tron said:
thepancakeman said:
tron said:
Stupid rumor. Sorry I cannot believe it.

C'mon man, it is the year of the lens; this might be THE lens! :D
Still it is even more stupid than other rumors ;)

Just because it is not a lens you want?
No just because the existing one is a very good lens.
+1
maybe it is just a version II to lower production cost, with identical optical formula
 
Upvote 0