Hi all!
I want to upgrade from my 6d mk 2 to a mirrorless body but I´m not sure whether I want the R6 or the R8. I live in europe, where they are priced pretty similarly (R8 is 1800€, R6 is 2000€). I like the features the R6 brings to the table like IBIS, dual card slots and better wheather sealing. I´ve also been to a camera shop and held both of them in my hands and the R6 felt significantly better in my hands (but maybe the grip extension would make the R8 better?) and I really like the bigger and higher res EVF.
However the R8 is cheaper, and still has the better sensor and improved AF. Honestly i´m probabbly going to be really happy with the AF performance of the R6, but still it kind of feels weird paying more money and getting worse performance. Do you think the R6 is still a better camera than the R8? I know that the R6 mark 2 would solve all my problems but it is much more expensive here at 2800€, and I´d much rather invest any additional money in to glass.
I want to upgrade from my 6d mk 2 to a mirrorless body but I´m not sure whether I want the R6 or the R8. I live in europe, where they are priced pretty similarly (R8 is 1800€, R6 is 2000€). I like the features the R6 brings to the table like IBIS, dual card slots and better wheather sealing. I´ve also been to a camera shop and held both of them in my hands and the R6 felt significantly better in my hands (but maybe the grip extension would make the R8 better?) and I really like the bigger and higher res EVF.
However the R8 is cheaper, and still has the better sensor and improved AF. Honestly i´m probabbly going to be really happy with the AF performance of the R6, but still it kind of feels weird paying more money and getting worse performance. Do you think the R6 is still a better camera than the R8? I know that the R6 mark 2 would solve all my problems but it is much more expensive here at 2800€, and I´d much rather invest any additional money in to glass.