I'm in HI! Nice photos BTW!Here too - are you in BC?
Upvote
0
I'm in HI! Nice photos BTW!Here too - are you in BC?
Every day I find my style leaning more and more toward high contrast black and white photography which is not always a logical choice when it comes to wildlife photography. Sometimes though it works quite well and i really like this image of a pair of Yellow tailed Black Cockatoos.
I'm in HI! Nice photos BTW!
I have a question for you Alan, and I apologize if you have been asked this before. In your humble opinion which is sharper, the 100-400L with 1.4TC on the 5DSR or the 100-400L on the 90D?I never ignore sparrows. Here is one in honour of the Canadians, taken in Lunenberg, Nova Scotia, with a 7DII + 100-400mm II + 1,4xTC.
View attachment 189196
I can speak for the 100-400mm II. There's really not much between them, and it depends on the quality of the TC and how you process the RAW image (I don't use ooc jpegs). If you squeeze every drop of resolution using DxO PL and its lens sharpness tool, the 90D just wins. But, its files are grainy for heavy cropping and I don't like them. Noise Ninja sorts out the noise, but then the 5DSR has the edge. If you don't crop, you would be pushed to see the difference.I have a question for you Alan, and I apologize if you have been asked this before. In your humble opinion which is sharper, the 100-400L with 1.4TC on the 5DSR or the 100-400L on the 90D?
Every day I find my style leaning more and more toward high contrast black and white photography which is not always a logical choice when it comes to wildlife photography. Sometimes though it works quite well and i really like this image of a pair of Yellow tailed Black Cockatoos.
I have taken this quarantined afternoon a series of comparison images. At the pixel peeking level, the 5DSR has the edge in general, albeit slight for sharpness. I don't understand the odd comment in CR forums complaining about the 5DSR files. I find them very clean at iso 640, for example, where the 90D is beginning to show some noise.I can speak for the 100-400mm II. There's really not much between them, and it depends on the quality of the TC and how you process the RAW image (I don't use ooc jpegs). If you squeeze every drop of resolution using DxO PL and its lens sharpness tool, the 90D just wins. But, its files are grainy for heavy cropping and I don't like them. Noise Ninja sorts out the noise, but then the 5DSR has the edge. If you don't crop, you would be pushed to see the difference.
The Forsythia has come out at the bottom of the garden and has attracted some Longtailed Tits. They don't stay still or pose at all. Captured one yesterday at 30m which is tiny number of pixels, but I caught one this afternoon closer by.
View attachment 189256
Some from recent outing. The owl a long way awayView attachment 189297View attachment 189298View attachment 189299
It scares me to hear comments about ISO 640 I can scarcely remember shooting down that low. More often than not I'm 1250 - 3200 but I guess I must factor in your downsizing.I have taken this quarantined afternoon a series of comparison images. At the pixel peeking level, the 5DSR has the edge in general, albeit slight for sharpness. I don't understand the odd comment in CR forums complaining about the 5DSR files. I find them very clean at iso 640, for example, where the 90D is beginning to show some noise.