Thank you, Jack! The images are nice, especially considering high ISO.Jack Douglas said:Another 400 shot. ISO 3200
Upvote
0
Thank you, Jack! The images are nice, especially considering high ISO.Jack Douglas said:Another 400 shot. ISO 3200
Beautiful light on this one. Nice!jmeyer said:These were all taken with the 7D MKII, EF500 F4 and 1.4XIII
Bay-breasted Warbler
Click said:
Cog said:Beautiful light on this one. Nice!jmeyer said:These were all taken with the 7D MKII, EF500 F4 and 1.4XIII
Bay-breasted Warbler
jmeyer said:These were all taken with the 7D MKII, EF500 F4 and 1.4XIII
Nelson's Sharp-tailed Sparrow
Harris's Sparrow
LeConte's Sparrow
Jack Douglas said:Alan, how do you think this fared compared to the 5DSR?
Jack
Sweet!! It's great to see such a comeback of these incredible birds.Mikehit said:Bald Eagle, Vancouver Island.
The evening light set it off wonderfully against the background and then it gave the most awesome call
Canon 7D2, 100-400MkII at 400mm. Cropped to vertical format
Alan, in another thread you had said that: 400mm DO II + 1.4xTC 5DS R is similar to 400mm DO II + 2xTC on 5DS R. It seems a little contradictory...AlanF said:Jack Douglas said:Alan, how do you think this fared compared to the 5DSR?
Jack
The 5DS R gives ~30% more linear resolution than the 5D IV. The 400mm DO + 1.4xTC on the 5DS R is very similar to the 400 + 2xTC on the 5D IV. Both are noticeably sharper and less noisy than 560mm on the 7D II. 800mm on the 5DS R gives the best resolution of all. The advantage of the 5D IV should be in BIF. So, far I have been hardly able to test the 5D IV, but the preliminary evidence looks good.
vagngart said:Sparrowhawk - Denmark
5D3 500/4L II +1.4 III
Stewart K said:Kruger National Park last week, a Juvenile Bateleur Eagle, I was lucky enough to also see as adult male and female!!!
tron said:Alan, in another thread you had said that: 400mm DO II + 1.4xTC 5DS R is similar to 400mm DO II + 2xTC on 5DS R. It seems a little contradictory...AlanF said:Jack Douglas said:Alan, how do you think this fared compared to the 5DSR?
Jack
The 5DS R gives ~30% more linear resolution than the 5D IV. The 400mm DO + 1.4xTC on the 5DS R is very similar to the 400 + 2xTC on the 5D IV. Both are noticeably sharper and less noisy than 560mm on the 7D II. 800mm on the 5DS R gives the best resolution of all. The advantage of the 5D IV should be in BIF. So, far I have been hardly able to test the 5D IV, but the preliminary evidence looks good.
Now as far as: "Both are noticeably sharper and less noisy than 560mm on the 7D II. " I guess I will have to send you the bill eventually ;D
ThanksAlanF said:tron said:Alan, in another thread you had said that: 400mm DO II + 1.4xTC 5DS R is similar to 400mm DO II + 2xTC on 5DS R. It seems a little contradictory...AlanF said:Jack Douglas said:Alan, how do you think this fared compared to the 5DSR?
Jack
The 5DS R gives ~30% more linear resolution than the 5D IV. The 400mm DO + 1.4xTC on the 5DS R is very similar to the 400 + 2xTC on the 5D IV. Both are noticeably sharper and less noisy than 560mm on the 7D II. 800mm on the 5DS R gives the best resolution of all. The advantage of the 5D IV should be in BIF. So, far I have been hardly able to test the 5D IV, but the preliminary evidence looks good.
Now as far as: "Both are noticeably sharper and less noisy than 560mm on the 7D II. " I guess I will have to send you the bill eventually ;D
Under ideal conditions 800mm on the 5DS R does give the highest resolution. But, in practice for most of the time 560mm on the 5DS R gives better results.
Jack Douglas said:Perhaps it will take a bit of time to really sort this out. I can wait. Here's a 560 shot about 50% of the frame at ISO 6400.
Jack
Nicely done, Jack.Jack Douglas said:Thanks Alan. Perhaps it will take a bit of time to really sort this out. I can wait. Here's a 560 shot about 50% of the frame at ISO 6400.
Jack