expatinasia said:
dilbert said:
...
In both of these cases, the 1DX has stopped writing to the file at the 18 minute mark. A little bit more than half way to 29:59. I'd call "18 minutes" well before "29 minutes and 59 seconds". Maybe you don't but I do.
...
....
The 1DX does not stop recording at 18:XX mins the video file just gets put into another file.
I didn't say that the 1DX stopped recording, I said that it stopped writing to the file. As you've pointed out, this is not the same. And people get upset at me for not understanding or misrepresenting
But people have said in this thread that multiple files is bad. Even you said that. Yet you put up with it - from Canon.
If you used larger cards (128GB or more) then you would get larger files and more than 18:XX minutes of video per file.
The videos I mentioned which are about 3.8GB in size and roughly 18:XX mins long were recorded in IPB at 1920x1080 at 25 frames per second.
3.8GB for 18 minutes is only 28Mbps or roughly 7MB/sec (average.)
You're all having a dig at Nikon for doing multiple 3minute files for 4K video but the reason Nikon does it is exactly the same that Canon cameras already split up 1080p video. Nobody seems to want to accept or acknowledge that.
It will be interesting to see if the 1DXII will record 4K at all to non-CFast cards and how long (in time) the video file segments are when recording to (say) 64GB CFast cards as the camera will with FAT32 and files will be limited to 4GB in size.
Summary:
The behavior of the 1DX with FAT32 cards is exactly the same as the Nikon D5. Expect the 1DXII to be the same too.