I don't know the method for measuring pockets. They are fairly cheap jeans sold at Targe for around $17.99, but that was about 6 years ago.
Upvote
0
There are at least 3 more PowerZoom lenses coming [CR3]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors
- Start date
That'll be millions of pencils for John, enough to create peace from SoNitrolls
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
It might be as big, heavy and expensive as the 24-70 f/2, but it should be possible.
Upvote
0
I liked the Canon CN-E 18-80mm Servo Zoom becuase it was physically parfocal with a backfocus adjustment. That lens works perfectly on the BMPCC 6K, but won't even work on the Canon EOS R7 with any Official Canon EF-RF Adapter.
I never used the Servo-Zoom for that lens. I only did whip fast manual zooms at Awards Shows.
The new 24-105mm Z lens is great because of the constant F/2.8 aperture and extended range over the 24-70mm, however the lack of being physically parfocal is a big bummer.
Canon's Servo Zooms at this price range are whimpy and unusable for me where fast crisp zooms are necessary.
I never used the Servo-Zoom for that lens. I only did whip fast manual zooms at Awards Shows.
The new 24-105mm Z lens is great because of the constant F/2.8 aperture and extended range over the 24-70mm, however the lack of being physically parfocal is a big bummer.
Canon's Servo Zooms at this price range are whimpy and unusable for me where fast crisp zooms are necessary.
Upvote
0
Oh.. please throw shade at those APS-C cameras
I can't be the only one tossing shade around in here 
Upvote
0
I saw a patent application that seemed to suggest that canon was looking at automating keeping a lens parfocal. but the Japanese translation was too garbled to explain it. so they may be looking at other ways to improve this.
Upvote
0
If Canon was to release a RF-S 15-60/2.8 lens, it would be Canon's first interesting RF-S lens for me.
I don't do video, and don't care about powerzoom option. But definitely sounds like a perfect replacement for my EF-S 17-55/2.8.
I would probably miss something in the long end if making it my standard walk-around lens instead of the EF-S 15-85mm. But it has the important 15mm in the short end, so if weight of an RF-S 15-60mm/2.8 was closer to the EF-S 15-85mm than to the 17-55mm/2.8 (which I hope is realistic with the shorter flange distance of a mirrorless lens?), it might still be considered for that too.
Oh well. I'm thinking to much about it. It is still only a "random" lens-patent coupled with a not so specific rumour
UPDATE: (Still thinking to much about it...) Just studied the referenced patent. It seems the lens in patent has a fixed length of 14.4cm. So pretty long, and it is of course because it is an internal zoom (probably needed for video and powerzoom compatibility?). So I guess it will be a pretty big lens.
Would still be an interesting lens, but probably not a potential standard-zoom to replace my EF-S 15-85mm...
Upvote
0
Similar threads
