There Are Two More VCM Prime Lenses Coming

I’m not sure I would use a 16/1.4 for underwater. A narrow dof is always tricky to get the subject in focus but it would be good for low light ie without strobes eg orcas in Norway

It would be good for concerts etc in low light or even better for Astro although I would prefer a 14/1.8 instead.
I really wish Canon would give us a big aperture 14mm or something...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
I really wish Canon would give us a big aperture 14mm or something...
I’ve just ordered the astrhori 6/2.8 for fun. Should be easier to shoot vertically for full sky astro/Milky Wayto have more stuff on the horizon.
The 8-15/4 is a stop slower and you really need stuff to be close and you shooting low to fill more of the horizon eg below. Should also be fun for architecture especially for its size and low cost
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6801.jpeg
    IMG_6801.jpeg
    441.9 KB · Views: 11
Upvote 0
Yeah, just that I own both RF 100 and RF 135 and would find it strange

Well, they have 3 85s, 3 50s, 3 70-200s, 2 24-105s. Again, it's about matching the size, weight, the auto iris, the aperture ring (I love the feature). The lenses you mention are completely different intended applications.

People have been using 100mm 2.8 macros as portrait lenses forever, it is a bit more versatile. The 135mm f2/f1.8 obviously give a crazy depth of field and more geared to portrait and event. Though it can be used for whatever you want outside of tilting and shift. :P
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
I’ve just ordered the astrhori 6/2.8 for fun. Should be easier to shoot vertically for full sky astro/Milky Wayto have more stuff on the horizon.
The 8-15/4 is a stop slower and you really need stuff to be close and you shooting low to fill more of the horizon eg below. Should also be fun for architecture especially for its size and low cost

I have the 9mm TTartisan, it's impossible, takes too long to get rid of the green fringing. I think it's more the sensor than the lens, or a bit of both. Doesn't matter, I suck at wide angle anyway.

I'd be interested to know if the 6mm is the same.
 

Attachments

  • 2D3A1363.jpg
    2D3A1363.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 22
  • 2D3A1364.jpg
    2D3A1364.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 23
Upvote 0
what are the disadvantages of VCM lenses for stills photography?

Well, the wider ones require correction for distortion. that's easy to do, but some people don't like that, which is totally fine.

I don't find it an issue at all with the 50, and the 85 should be the same. The 50 does have lemon bokeh compared to the 1.2, but only nerds notice that. I did order the 20 with the 85 preorder, so I'll experience it. Maybe that will annoy me. You can set your viewfinder to correct it, so you don't see it using the lens.

The MTF for the 35 VCM shows that it's still sharp across the frame, better than the EF. So the optics are great.
 

Attachments

  • 2nn40y.jpg
    2nn40y.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 12
Upvote 0
Probably first world problems: they moves/shakes on the bag; have an ring you can't block.

VCM lenses need power to hold the elements in place, as they draw from the camera when in use. So once the camera is off, it lets go. It's like IBIS cameras, take the battery out and the magnets let go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Another VCM, another VCM, yet another VCM... I signed up for Canon gears because they said a lot of new lenses were coming - but to me these VCM lenses are just slightly better copies of already existing lenses. Where are the real NEW lenses? Other brands focus on innovative focal lengths, apertures and/or lightweight lenses while Canon just releases copies...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
I don't think a 135mm F2 would makes sense given there is a 135mm F1.8. I don't know if a 135mm F2.8 would make sense in terms of being lightweight. Also, if there is no lens with a focal length under 20mm, I'd conclude following focal lengths:

ranked after perceived/ guessed probability:
1.) 28mm F1.4
2.) 105mm F1.8 (or F2)
3.) 65mm (or 70mm) F1.4

I don´t really think option 3 is realistic. If a UWA would be in mix, I´d guess

4.) 16mm F1.8 (or f1.4 if possible).
I am for 16mm F1.4 if no excessive barrel nor pincushion distortion; a little bit is ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
VCM lenses need power to hold the elements in place, as they draw from the camera when in use. So once the camera is off, it lets go. It's like IBIS cameras, take the battery out and the magnets let go.

Sony, Nikon and Canon have their own implementations, hopefully Canon doesn't have the same issue you're describing.
 
Upvote 0