Two Lenses Coming for CP+? [CR2]

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,628
5,441
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15218"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=15218">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>CP+ 2014 Camera & Photo Imaging Show


</strong>We’re told that Canon could possibly announce and show two new lenses at the CP+ 2014 show in Tokyo, Japan. The show runs from February 13, 2014 until February 16, 2014.</p>
<p>They will not be Cinema EOS lenses. New lenses for videographers will be held for NAB 2014 in Las Vegas, along with some new Cinema EOS camera(s).</p>
<p>It’s speculated that one lens will be an “L” and the other a consumer non-L prime. As with all lens announcements, things are very loose and rarely have a media event attached to them.</p>
<p>There is also a possibility of a development announcement on a camera body we’re told.</p>
<p>Hope to hear more soon…</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
 
Arctic Photo said:
Arctic Photo said:
I'd really lime an UWA prime, maybe 18mm would be fun. There was also talk about a 16-50L a couple of months ago. That would be awesome.

For now I am only thinking about how to be able to fit the 24-70 Mkii in to the budget.
Like, not lime...

You know, you can 'Modify' your posts. I know I do when I've gotten confused with my keyboard ;)
 
Upvote 0
mrsfotografie said:
Arctic Photo said:
Arctic Photo said:
I'd really lime an UWA prime, maybe 18mm would be fun. There was also talk about a 16-50L a couple of months ago. That would be awesome.

For now I am only thinking about how to be able to fit the 24-70 Mkii in to the budget.
Like, not lime...

You know, you can 'Modify' your posts. I know I do when I've gotten confused with my keyboard ;)
I know, thanks. I'm using a tablet now and I don't care much for the 'keyboard'. Next time, I'll edit ::)
 
Upvote 0
Ruined said:
Viggo said:
35 L II and the 50 f1.8 IS 8)

+1

Could also be update of 135L, but 35L is in more need IMO.

Really? I use my 35L day in day out for professional weddings and it's an amazing performer. Sure it could do with a warm over but it's not going to make a huge difference over the current model. Sure, better AF in lower light, newer coatings and weather sealing would be nice...but don't be fooled, it's one of the finest picture taking optics in Canon's catalogue.
 
Upvote 0
GMCPhotographics said:
Ruined said:
Viggo said:
35 L II and the 50 f1.8 IS 8)
+1
Could also be update of 135L, but 35L is in more need IMO.
Really? I use my 35L day in day out for professional weddings and it's an amazing performer. Sure it could do with a warm over but it's not going to make a huge difference over the current model. Sure, better AF in lower light, newer coatings and weather sealing would be nice...but don't be fooled, it's one of the finest picture taking optics in Canon's catalogue.

Really. If I need f/1.4 for creative (DoF) reasons, I reach for the 35L...for everything else, the 24-70/2.8L II is better.

Ricku said:
I think Im going to puke if one of those lenses aren't a tack sharp UWA-zoom lens.

Keep a bucket handy... ;)
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
GMCPhotographics said:
Ruined said:
Viggo said:
35 L II and the 50 f1.8 IS 8)
+1
Could also be update of 135L, but 35L is in more need IMO.
Really? I use my 35L day in day out for professional weddings and it's an amazing performer. Sure it could do with a warm over but it's not going to make a huge difference over the current model. Sure, better AF in lower light, newer coatings and weather sealing would be nice...but don't be fooled, it's one of the finest picture taking optics in Canon's catalogue.

Really. If I need f/1.4 for creative (DoF) reasons, I reach for the 35L...for everything else, the 24-70/2.8L II is better.

Ricku said:
I think Im going to puke if one of those lenses aren't a tack sharp UWA-zoom lens.

Keep a bucket handy... ;)
I believe that the truth for 35 1.4 is somewhere in between. It is a good lens but for the performance at the edges. In addition it has lots of coma although the latter bothers only the astrophotographers. It is a pitty that Canon ultra bright wide (35mm 1.4L and 24mm 1.4L II) fast lenses have lots of coma...
+1 on that ... bucket ... ;D (I too would love one of the two but I am not optimistic...)
 
Upvote 0