August 26
It appears the Kamerabild.se article may have been from 2008. This is why you should clearly date stuff.
D3X vs 1Ds Mark III
A review site I just bumped into put the 2 $$$ beasts up against each other.
http://www.h2hreviews.com/article/Head-2-Head-Review-Nikon-D3x-vs-Canon-EOS-1Ds-Mark-III.html
A Direct Quote
“With all that out of the way, here's our comparison: the Canon 1Ds Mark III beat the Nikon D3X in most measures of image quality – detail, color accuracy, noise and dynamic range. Usually not by much, but with convincing consistency. The Nikon, however, has much better autofocus and mechanics. The D3x’s ability to focus via the Live View data stream is a significant distinction, depending on how problematic heat buildup is. The comparison of Nikon and Canon user interfaces is subjective in the end. We like Nikon's variations in controls.”
The review is from June and I just read it today.
cr
66 Comments
An alleged announcement on the 26th
Can someone please tell me if we will be getting a mark II version of the 70-200 2.8 L and or 135mm L?!?
What good is fantastic autofocus when you cant see anything in the viewfinder past the 400 AF points?
aha, lol
according to http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_7d.html , a franch foto mag has told us that canon would have an announcement on the 25th. hehe. let’s continue guessing
i have the mark one version of the 135l, and im fully pleased with. there’s no need for a mark II.