Opinion: This patent identifies my ongoing issue with Canon
- By PhilC
- Canon General
- 243 Replies
I am one of those looking for smaller weight ( my neck is getting old) smaller cost and smaller size.I enjoyed using the EF-S 17-55/2.8 on a 7D. However, along the way I realized that the EF 24-105/4L on a FF camera was even better – wider, longer, and faster, coupled with the better noise performance of a larger sensor. Now, I get to pair a 24-105/2.8 with a FF sensor. IMO, the ultimate general purpose setup.
IMO, the only significant advantages of APS-C systems are generally lower cost, lighter weight and smaller size (I say generally because you can spend more on a Fuji APS-C system than a Canon FF system for the same coverage). Those are real, tangible advantages, but from an image-making standpoint FF gives more flexibility.
IMO, the R7 is aimed mainly at those using telephoto lenses and wanting more reach. Canon has provided a high performance crop body to pair with lenses like the RF 100-500L, 100-400, RF 600/11 and RF 800/11, and now the RF 200-800. Outside of the tele range, Canon is trying to push general users seeking better performance into FF bodies and lenses...and they've made doing so feasible, e.g. the R8 delivers good performance and a FF sensor for less than the cost of the R7, and there is a relatively inexpensive (compared to other brands) set of zooms covering 15-400mm.
I had bought the Canon 7D with its excellent kit lens 15-85 as I do mainly travel photo this was the perfect kit for me. I added 10-22, 70-300, Sigma 30 1.4 and 60 macro. I want the RF 7 with a 15-85 or 15-60 at minimum.
I could go for RF6 and 24-105 but then I can dump all my other lenses and if I want to add more RF lenses it will cost me more and weight more . Will Canon RF APS-C ever come out with a travel lens like most competitors do ? If not I will swap to Fuji or Panasonic
Upvote
0




