• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Real world battery life - time lapses

Since no one talks about it, I figure I'll start a thread:

T6i with OEM LP-E17 battery
Canon 10-18mm lens, IS & AF off
Using an external wired intervalometer (delay start 20 min, with power down set at 1min)
screen folded inward with image review turned off
5 second interval
RAW image

Filled a 64gb card with 2,035 images and hadn't yet died. 440 shots per battery my left foot...
From LensRentals "the new LP-E17 battery is rated for 440 shots per charge"

1 Ds mk II with 14mm lens (af off)
A/C adapter running off Vagabond Mini
3 hours, shot every 5 seconds (to a 128gb Delkin CF card)
RAW image
didn't even cause the battery to drop to 75%

  • Poll Poll
What will be the mirrorless full-frame mount?

After the recent CR2 that stated we are not getting a new mount with Canon's upcoming FF mirrorless

  • It will have full blown EF. No adaptors. No FF mirrorless only lenses.

    Votes: 54 66.7%
  • EF-S. There will be an adaptor for EF to shoot natively, but there will be new FF mirrorless only l

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • EF-M. The current EF-M adaptor will allow EF to shoot natively, but there will be new FF mirrorless

    Votes: 14 17.3%
  • The market is large enough that there will be two FF mirrorless mounts -- one with full EF and anoth

    Votes: 4 4.9%
  • I do not believe the CR2 rumor. There will be an altogether new mount for FF mirrorless.

    Votes: 8 9.9%

After all the hubbub caused by the recent CR2 on the FF mirrorless mount situation, what say ye?

Don't vote what you want -- vote what you think will happen.


- A

EOS 5D Mark IV review--from the trenches

Very refreshing review, with many sample shots taken from actual weddings (rather than taken just for the review!). Seems sincere, and it was written after being used for five weddings.

And, oh my goodness, no hysteria when glitches were encountered!

Enjoy!

http://www.andydavison.com/canon-eos-5d-mkiv-user-review/


Side note: Google seems very poor recently for finding reviews of bodies and lenses. Same stale few results are returned, but mostly, way mostly, advertisements. Andy Davison's review came up when I searched Bing.

Canon makes non-profit CDPs Climate A-List for first time

HTML:
<strong>TOKYO, October 25, 2016</strong>—Canon’s initiatives to tackle climate change have been recognized by the international non-profit organization CDP,<sup>1</sup> based in the United Kingdom, earning the Company its first inclusion on the Climate A List.</p>
<p>Since 2003, the CDP has evaluated major companies worldwide on their efforts to tackle climate change. The evaluations are based on information disclosed in response to questions sent to the companies<sup>2</sup> regarding business risks and opportunities associated with greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. In 2016, approximately 6,000 businesses were assessed, of which 500 were Japanese. The evaluation ranks companies on a scale from A to F, with A being the highest, and Canon was declared one of the 193 companies in the world to make the A List.</p>
<p>Under its Action for Green environmental vision, introduced in 2008, Canon set a goal of annually reducing lifecycle CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for each product by 3%, and is proactively making efforts through such initiatives as energy-saving activities at manufacturing bases, a modal shift in distribution, reduced energy consumption during product use, product remanufacturing,<sup>3</sup> reusing parts and recycling consumable goods. As a result, in 2015, lifecycle CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per product were approximately 30% of those in 2008—successfully achieving an average reduction of approximately 5% a year.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Canon’s Action for Green environmental vision aims to realize a society that promotes both enriched lifestyles and the global environment through technological innovation and improved management efficiency. Throughout the entire product lifecycle—Produce, Use, Recycle—Canon continues to expand activities with its customers and business partners to reduce environmental burden in pursuit of this environmental vision.</p>
<ol class="padl20">
<li class="notice">Formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project, established in the U.K. in 2000. CDP supports a singular global system whereby businesses and cities measure, disclose, manage and share important environmental information.</li>
<li class="notice">Responses represent 827 institutional investors (with combined total assets of US$100 trillion).</li>
<li class="notice">A process of selecting parts that can be reused from used products, cleaning and repairing those parts and using them to manufacture new products. Remanufactured products are confirmed to have the same levels of quality as products manufactured entirely with new parts prior to shipment.</li>
</ol>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Full Frame Mirrorless [CR2]

HTML:
We’re told once again that a full frame mirrorless camera is definitely in the works at Canon. As we’ve also said before, the biggest challenge to the design team is making good use of EF mount lenses. There will not be a 4th mount (EF, EF-S, EF-M) added to the Canon ILC lineup.</p>
<p>It’s possible we’re going to see a full frame mirrorless fixed lens camera from Canon before we see an ILC full frame mirrorless. We were told a while ago that such a camera was in development and apparently that is still ongoing.</p>
<p>The product roadmap for mirrorless from Canon has no been finalized and there’s a good chance we’re going to hear a lot of conflicting information over the coming months. The source doesn’t expect any sort of full frame mirrorless announcement until the end of 2017 at the earliest.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

New Nikon 70-200 Fail

$2,800? LOL.

It remains to be seen whether this lens will meet, let alone beat the mighty Canon 70-200 2.8 II

Even if it has finally met it, it will do so at nearly $850 more. Ouch! $850 is a whole other premium pro lens.

Nikon "went full retard" (see Tropic Thunder) with the reversal of the zoom and focus rings, which will aggravate anyone who has a pro lineup of lenses. I can see wedding pros having a dandy time slinging a 24-70 and 70-200 with different zoom ring / focus ring positions.

I wonder if this lens has finally fixed the unacceptable focus-breathing issue of the VRII version? A 70-200 that only really does 70-135ish for headshots at $2,300 is a joke. Maybe this fixes that.

I suspect the optics will be solid. Sharp, clean, contrast, low distortion and all that. But again, at $2,800? We're not talking a special high end wide like the 11-24. This is a 70-200. That kind of money buys you a 11-24 which will open up options not possible with other glass.

Canon has for all intents and purposes, the perfect 70-200 and does it for just under $2,000, and $200 less when rebate season is on.

LensTip Review: Sigma A 12-24 mm f/4 DG HSM

Thar she blows:
http://www.lenstip.com/488.1-Lens_review-Sigma_A_12-24_mm_f_4_DG_HSM.html

  • Sharp, but not the 'Art sharp' we've come to expect -- the 11-24L outperforms it, esp. in the center of the frame
  • Coma is decent -- similar to the 11-24L
  • For the Sigma AF wary shopper, the autofocus did not miss (0%) in testing, but one would hope an ultrawide + slower lens should get this result. (Still, it's good to know.)

From what I've read (please correct me if I'm wrong), the new Sigma lacks the 11-24L's rear ND slot and it isn't weather sealed, but otherwise it looks a solid and affordable alternative to the 11-24L.

- A

Why Focus Peaking Would be Useful on a DSLR Camera

It seems that Canon's attitude is that they make autofocus lenses and for that reason they don't need focus peaking on their DSLR bodies. It seems that as far as EF mount lenses go, Canon's attitude is that they make no manual focus lenses.

However, that isn't entirely true. In fact there are several manual focus lenses on offer in their current catalogue, namely their tilt-shift lenses:

TS-E17mm F4L
TS-E24mm F3.5L II
TS-E45mm F2.8
TS-E90mm F2.8

I can imagine Canon's attitude here. You are meant to set them up on a tripod and use live view, zooming in to check your focus as you shoot architecture. The trouble is that this is hardly the only use for a tilt-shift lens. I belong amongst a growing number of people who use tilt-shift lenses for creative portraiture etc.

There are lots of articles on the subject:

https://www.slrlounge.com/creating-artistic-portraits-using-tilt-shift-lens/

https://fstoppers.com/review/my-new-favorite-lens-not-found-very-many-photographer-bags-3186

It is hardly a situation where you would want to be forced to set up on a tripod and use live view to focus. Nor would you want to use autofocus confirm, which just isn't accurate on this type of lens.

The best solution is to get some sort of guidance from focus peaking. While you can install it using Magic Lantern, this may invalidate any warrantee. My solution? Use a Metabones adapter and shoot with Canon tilt-shift lenses mounted on a Sony a7II, and use its native focus peaking ability. But I wish Canon didn't force me to do that. I would prefer to forgo the cumbersome adapter and mount my tilt-shift lenses on my 5DsR.

The bizarre thing is that the EOS M5 has focus peaking even though that mount has not had a single manual focus native lens released for it, whereas the EF mount has several.

That's not all. Canon make macro lenses too don't they? At least I seem to own a couple of them and they still list them in their catalogue. The Canon MP-E65mm macro is a manual focus only model as well bringing the number of manual focus native lenses up to five in their current catalogue. We all know that it's a pretty basic aspect of macro that it is often preferable to override the autofocus and focus manually because the depth of field gets so shallow. Focus peaking isn't perfect either, but it can act as a useful guide.

If Canon are utterly petrified that their users will abandon their native autofocus lenses in droves and replace them with Zeiss manual focus lenses instead, couldn't they at least make it so that the body recognises a native tilt-shift or macro lens and permit focus peaking to be activated only then? Even better if Canon would additionally allow the activation of focus magnification. Unless Canon want to restrict use of their tilt-shift lenses to architecture and landscape only? Don't they want to let people explore creative uses of Canon tilt-shift lenses so that they appeal to a wider audience?

I really wish that Canon wouldn't ignore niche users for trivial reasons and just put focus peaking into all of their bodies. Or maybe Canon want to encourage me to shoot more with my tilt-shift lenses adapted to my Sony? Sometimes, I just wonder...

Replacements for Einsteins: Elincrom? Profoto?

I've had a shocking month with my previously totally reliable PCB Einsteins. Three expensive failures inside a month. It's shattered my confidence in them. Luckily I have six of them so breakdowns while on jobs have been limited to annoying changeovers rather than ruining the shoot. I always take spare everything!

It's got me looking at alternatives. I'd get four heads initially. On the list being considered are:
Elinchrom ELC PRO 500 (looks good, premium price)
Elinchrom BRX 500 (half the price, what's missing?)
Profoto D1 500 Air (I dumped unreliable & heavy Profoto Compact 600's to get Einsteins)

Then there are dozens of Chinese alternatives which I don't know whether to trust or not.

Anyone been down this road? Whatever I get will be used solidly, carted from studio to locations and occasionally air-freighted. I don't necessarily need battery power, TTL or HSS. Fully manual is fine.

What I did love about the Einsteins is their huge power range, compact dimensions and light weight, not to mention low price and inexpensive modifiers. But reliability is paramount when your business depends on it.

-pw

Review: Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III

HTML:
<p>Roger at Lensrentals.com has completed his bench test of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III wide angle zoom lens. It looks like the lens performance is the new pinnacle for wide angle zoom lenses and you should probably go ahead and buy one!</p>
<p>From Roger:</p>
<blockquote><p>This summary is quick and simple. From a resolution standpoint, the <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/wide-angle/canon-16-35mm-f2.8l-iii" target="_blank">Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 Mk III</a> is the best f/2.8 wide-angle zoom available. You might be better served with the f/4 IS and some money in your pocket. There are also some very good wide-angle f/2.8 zooms available from third party manufacturers that are a lot less expensive and might offer more bang-for-the-buck. But if your style of photography needs the highest resolution you can get with a wide-angle lens, well this is it. I don’t use a wide-angle zoom all that often, but when I do, it will be this one. <a href="https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/10/canon-16-35mm-f2-8l-mark-iii-optical-bench-tests/">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It looks like the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III is in stock across most retailers.</p>
<p>Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III: <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1274708-REG/canon_ef_16_35mm_f_2_8l_iii.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2bPL0jq">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA16353.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/2bkKGfQ">Canon Store</a> | <a href="https://mpex.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-iii-lens.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Cold weather wide-angle re-hash

I have searched the threads and seen this issue danced around a bit... but not the exact issue discussed (as far as I could find).

I'm planning a trip to Trømso (northern Norway) in February 2017. I've got a handful of good-ish lens choices, but I'd like to hear what the group thinks. My main photographic goal at the time will be to photograph the (almost-everpresent) night sky if/when it's clear and the northern lights are active.

Of course, fast and wide are important. However, I think cold and moist are also a realistic concern. So with those factors in mind here's what we have available today.

  • 5Ds R: Really my only choice for main body. Seems a better option than the 7Dii for light capture, wide angle, resolution, etc.
  • Rokinon 14mm f/2.8: Would probably be the best option for combination of wide-angle, fast-ish lens, low-coma. But there's that pesky issue of lack of weather sealing. I would imagine I'd be putting myself in great danger of trashing my equipment in those conditions without a weather-sealed system.
  • 16-35mm f/2.8 L ii: We all know the issues with this lens. Good stopped down, not great wide open. It is weather sealed though!
  • 16-35mm f/4 L IS: Not fast, but weather sealed and relatively sharp wide open.
  • Sigma Art 24mm f/1.4: Again not weather sealed but a nice combination or relatively wide and quite fast.
  • 24-70mm f/2.8 L ii: Neither the widest nor the fastest lens of the bunch. But it's weather sealed, has good coma performance, and I swear my copy is the sharpest lens I own. It consistently amazes me how much detail I can get with this one on a tripod.

I've gone back and forth about upgrading to the 16-36mm f/2.8L iii. However, I'm really happy with the f/4 IS version that it seems like a much lower priority right now. Not ready to pull that trigger yet.

Anyway - I'd appreciate anyone's perspective on the best choice for this situation, taking both performance and equipment into consideration.

Speaking of weather-sealing. I hear the extreme cold makes the battery life decrease dramatically. I've got plenty of authentic Canon batteries to keep the camera going. But how to change the batteries without completely negating all that concern about keeping the camera weather-sealed? I'd appreciate any advice you may have on how to handle this.

Thanks as always!

Error 70 Message

Colleagues:
My well-used but very well cared-for 5D Mark 3 just spouted an 'error message 70.' I have done everything can think of: cleaned contacts, changed lenses, changed battery, cards, turned off/on several times.
Short of sending to CPS (I'm gold) does anyone have insight into this?
I have a 1Dx but I use both cameras daily.
Thank you for your time/suggestions.
If anyone wants to e mail me directly, feel free.

See addendum here, the next morning:

Thanks, each and all, for the error 70 suggestions.
I called CPS this morning and got excellent advice:
Since the error 70 message is triggered by an image defect, he suggested trying the cards one at a time, alone in the camera. So:
1. I took both cards out, turned camera on; the menu said it would not shoot without a card (which is of course how I set up the menu.) So far, so good.
2. I put in a different CF card. It worked.
3. I put in the same CF card. It worked.
4. I put in the SD card (alone); error 70. Camera unusable.
5. I put in a different SD card. It worked.
6. I put in new SD card and CF card. It worked.
So I think it is the original SD card.

A round of applause for Mill's Method of Concomitant Variation (and CPS!!)

The SD card is a Lexar Professional 64G 633X card, which, curiously, I have used for 3-4 months without any problems. So it all of a sudden got the vapors. I will have a chat with them.

Has anyone else experienced this with that type of Lexar card?

Thanks all, again.

Review - Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III Lens by TDP

HTML:
The-Digital-Picture has completed their review of the brand new Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III. As you would expect from a latest generation Canon L zoom, the lens is a stellar performer and worthy of its hefty price tag.</p>
<p>From Bryan:</p>
<blockquote><p>The MTF charts predicted excellence in regards to 16-35 L III image quality and the good news is that I think you will find that expectation fully delivered. With a pair of Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Lenses going through formal and informal testing, we have not been left disappointed. This lens is absolutely razor sharp across the entire full frame sensor at 16mm f/2.8, showing very impressive resolution and contrast. Stopping down makes very little 16mm sharpness difference in the center of the plane of sharp focus. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-16-35mm-f-2.8L-III-USM-Lens.aspx">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III is in stock at most retailers listed below.</p>
<p>Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III: <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1274708-REG/canon_ef_16_35mm_f_2_8l_iii.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2bPL0jq">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA16353.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/2bkKGfQ">Canon Store</a> | <a href="https://mpex.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-iii-lens.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB