Threads

JPlendPhoto · Jul 18, 2013

I have recently brought a Canon EOS 5D Mark II second hand. A few weeks ago I shot a wedding and noticed some of my shots where not composed well, first I thought this was me not paying attention but after the wedding I noticed that even though I didn’t recompose my shots, something in the camera is moving and altering what I see through the view finder, this happens more often when shooting portrait rather than landscape. Any idea why this is happening? Is there something in my camera which needs to be fixed?

1Dsx · Jul 18, 2013

Has anyone send their 1Dx to Canon Canada yet? Any feed back? I'm kind of scared to send mine after I read some of the articles.

jeanluc · Jul 18, 2013

Just wondering how most people are metering with their 5d3 (or 5d2) while using various ND filters.

Will the 5d3's meter be able to see well enough through say a 3 or 6 stop ND filter to allow one to just shoot in aperture priority mode with one of these on? Or is it best to meter, figure out the extra shutter speed, put it in manual, set the speed then throw on the filter?

What are most people doing with the 5D3 and 10 stop ND filters?

I have not really used ND filters much, and will be travelling to a waterfall-rich area soon and don't want to blow it by making a bunch of noob mistakes.

Anybody know of any particularly good waterfall-shooting advice sites?

Thanks for any help!!

jdramirez · Jul 17, 2013

I'm a recent 5D mkiii cult member and I really like it. I'm not quite sure that I buy into all the hype that full frame takes your photos to the next level and you'll look back at your old crop sensor photos with disgust and loathing. But I do like the mkiii. I feel it is a more than adequate upgrade from my 60D and it was well worth the money it cost to upgrade (Cost of mkiii minus the money I received from the sale of my 60D).

I haven't fully tested the low light performance of the mkiii though I will acknowledge it is superior to the 60D and the frames per second is more than satisfactory, and the auto focus is excellent... Basically I don't have any REAL complaints about the mkiii where as I did have some issues with the 60D (not afma, low light performance, rubber grips starting to come off, etc.) and I didn't want to upgrade to the 5D mkii because of the AF performance and the lack of the cross type peripheral AF points and the meh shots per second rate.

But my contention is that the 5D mkiii is practically the perfect mix of performance and durability for me. So why wouldn't I keep it for 7 years (when then mkV is released and presumably the mkiii is about to die)? What features would drive me to consider upgrading prematurely and by extension, what features would drive yall to upgrade?

The launch price for the mkiii body was $3500 which sounded astronomical at the time. If the mkiv's launch price is $4000, but you sell the mkiii for $1700 making the upgrade "only" $2300.

So the aforementioned question is 'How much better would the mkiv have to be for you to upgrade from the mkiii'? And I'm sorry that this basically excludes all non-mkiii owners, but ya'll haven't drank the Kool-aid yet.

Click · Jul 17, 2013

Photographer Gets So Close to Lava That His Shoes and Tripod Catch on Fire...

http://petapixel.com/2013/07/13/photographer-gets-so-close-to-lava-that-his-shoes-and-tripod-catch-on-fire/

When you need a good picture... :

Canon Rumors · Jul 17, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14022"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14022">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>Is the EOS M discontinued?</strong>

We’ve received a lot of emails about B&H Photo showing the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/883304-REG/Canon_6609b033_EOS_M_Digital_Camera_with.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">EOS M w/22mm STM</a> kit as “discontinued”. This has worried a few people that did order cameras that were backordered. I think it’s listed as discontinued on their site so no more can be ordered.</p>
<p>We spoke to B&H Photo today and have been told that all backorders will be fulfilled at the sale price. I didn’t get a date as to when that was happening.</p>
<p>The EOS M is likely reaching end of life and a new EOS M camera should be announced shortly. A second EOS M camera will be coming sometime in the fall we’re told.</p>
<p>You can still get great deals on the EOS M body with the EF-M 18-55 IS STM lens.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/898072-REG/Canon_6609b074_EOS_M_Mirrorless_Digital_Camera.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">EOS M w/18-55 IS STM $349</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/994787-REG/canon_caem185590_eos_m_mirrorless_digital.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">EOS M w/18-55 IS STM & 90EX Flash $419</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Alrik89 · Jul 17, 2013

Hi guys,

i'm looking for a telezoom lens. Until i can afford the 70-200mm 2.8 II, i want to have solution to get past the waiting time. I'm doing sports photography, mainly outdoor soccer. Sometimes i wanna shoot some birds or wild stuff like... birds of prey or deers. In conclusion, there are 2 lenses in the race: the old Canon 70-300mm and the Tamron 70-300mm VC USD.
Which one to choose? The cheaper Tamron or the Canon with the better optics?
Which one is your favorite, because i'm having a hard time with this question.

PS: The Canon 70-200mm f4 is not in the race due to expensiveness.

PPS: 1Ds II and EOS 40D (don't know the american term)

Canon Rumors · Jul 17, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/07/canon-germany-teaser/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2013/07/canon-germany-teaser/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>Something coming July 31, 2013?

</strong>Canon Germany just posted a video on their YouTube page saying “Your audience is waiting for you – 07/31/2013″. No other country has any kind of teaser for that day as of yet, though we could see them pop up over the next few days.</p>
<p>This type of ad seems to indicate something on the “consumer” side, more so than a “prosumer” product. We’ve also seen teasers like this in the past that are strictly for a regional service or event or maybe it’s a Canon Instagram clone.</p>
<p><strong>This is the ad</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/saslvyyNyD8?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><em>Thanks Marcus</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

dickgrafixstop · Jul 17, 2013

On the website NorthernLightImages there's a mock up of a 42mm f1.2 lens and the description clearly labels it as a fake. But it did get me thinking about what if Canon (or the N word) started to rethink their lens lines. A fast
42mm would be wonderful (especially with APS sized sensors). What other "new" lenses would you like to see.
It appears the zooms killed the 150mm focal length. Could you make a "less expensive" 250mm or 350mm (the
old Leica R longer primes)? Any other candidates?

Canon Rumors · Jul 17, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14010"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14010">Tweet</a></div>
<strong>The Canon EOS 8D</strong>
Over the last couple of weeks we’ve seen a few rumors for a Canon EOS 8D camera body. It first appeared on a Russian retailers web site (We won’t link because I think they’re just fishing for traffic) around the time of the EOS 70D announcement.</p>
<p>Today, we see a spec list published for the Canon EOS 8D on a Chinese retailer’s web site, they are below.</p>
<ul>
<li>Body features: APS-C size digital SLR</li>
<li>Effective pixels: 16.2 million</li>
<li>Mode of operation: full manual operation</li>
<li>Video Interface: AV Interface</li>
<li>Flash Type: External</li>
<li>External flash (hot shoe): Yes</li>
<li>Focus Points: 45 points</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CR’s Take</strong>

I file this under nonsense, as there is no Canon EOS 8D in development. If this leaked to a Russian & Chinese retailer, it would have leaked many other places as well. Secondly, the “7D” moniker will continue with the next version of the camera and Canon will not be adding another APS-C DSLR to their lineup.</p>
<p>I resist posting this sort of stuff, however it’s now making the rounds so I have to.</p>
<p><strong>Source: [<a href="http://www.canonwatch.com/the-canon-eos-8d-again-with-some-specs/" target="_blank">CW</a>] via [<a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_8d.html" target="_blank">NL</a>]</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

Jura · Jul 17, 2013

Much to my surprise my little brother just expressed an interest in learning photography! He has a go-pro 3 black edition which he uses to make surfing videos but I suspect the root of this new found interest is his new girlfriend who shoots a bit of film. Keen to encourage this new found enthusiasm I want to buy him a DSLR set up for his birthday and would appreciate some advise from the experts on this forum as I've not shot with some of the cameras I'm considering.
A couple of points to keep in mind:
1) I'm not rolling in cash but my girlfriend and I can probably stretch to round 400 quid, anything over that and he'll have to chip in
2) We're about to go travelling through Central America together for 6 weeks so whatever gear he is going to get is going to take a bit of a kicking (also 1 or two lenses only)
Our trip is why I'm going to get him a DSLR rather than a film camera and a fridge full of film.

so far I was considering
1)a 5D classic: not a camera I've used but one I've heard a lot of good things about. probably with a 28-135 lens of some type (will recommend he also picks up a nifty 50 or a shorty 40)
Advantage: image quality, rugged
Disadvantage: body cost, lack of good cheep wide zoom options, something about some 5d's having a wonky shutter?

2) a 40D and a 17-85mm I used to have a 40D and loved it before it got stolen in Peru. Not used the 17-85 but heard good things (again will recommend he also picks up a nifty 50 or a shorty 40)
Advantage: dual control wheels, magnesium alloy body
Disadvantage: no cheep normal prime

3) A rebel of some type: Not familiar with the rebel line at all. Everything since 500D shoots video?
Lenses: again tempted to go with the 17-85 as I cant afford the good EF-S lens zoom with F2.8 (17-55?)
Advantage: Video, Cheapest body option, smallest and lightest
Disadvantage: might not survive the trip, Single control wheel (A hindrance for learning?)

4)? is there something I've overlooked?

So what would you do in my situation. Is there a gem of a lens or a combo that I've overlooked?

All help greatly appreciated!

Here's some travel photos to counter the gear and request heavy nature of the thread

http://www.flickr.com/photos/28976399@N06/8130166533#
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28976399@N06/8130190696#
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28976399@N06/6837786574#

Ps. Is it possible to have photos hosted on Fickr appear within the post?

RJB · Jul 17, 2013

Hi all,

The new hotness from Sigma seems to be getting some pretty decent reviews so far - looks like a solid addition to the Art line-up. Personally I'm invested in FF kit so I won't be getting this, but if I were looking for an APSC zoom it'd be this or the Canon 17-55 2.8 is...

http://fstoppers.com/fstoppers-reviews-the-sigma-18-35mm-f1-8-dc-hsm-art-lens

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/sigma-18-35mm-f-1-8-dc-hsm-a-lens-review-22257

http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=5314&sigma+18-35+f1.8+lens+preview

Waiting for the big hitter reviews from the likes of TPD, Photozone etc, but promising no?

jayandlis · Jul 17, 2013

My Canon Mark iii keeps getting a delay between shutter clicks when shooting in continuous mode. It seems like it may not be getting full power from the battery but I have replaced the battery as well as the SD card but that doesn't make a difference. It doesn't do it all the time but will take a few rounds continuous shooting then revert to this slow odd click noise for each shutter. Any idea's what may be going on? It's only a few months old and I really don't feel like trying to get it fixed through the warranty.

tolusina · Jul 17, 2013

No, sorry, I don't have such a comparison nor have I been able to find one.

I'm about to move (a long overdue move at that) from a D-80 to a 6D, I never ever expect to own another Nikon.
I've read 6D reviews, specs and pixel peeped until my own focus blurs, the 6D sounds just about perfect for me, I expect to start with just the 40 mm pancake.
---
So, here are my questions
.
About the focusing screens;
Standard is the Eg-A II, Standard Precision Matte.
Optional is the Eg-D, Precision Matte with Grid. I like a grid in the finder, although lack of a grid is in no way a deal killer.
Also Optional is the Eg-S, Super Precision Matte. SUPER PRECISION, I really like the sound of that!!

I'm anxious for input from 6D (and 5D II?) users that have used two or more of the three Canon screens, I suppose I shouldn't be close minded about aftermarket options.

At wider lens apertures, is the Super Precision Matte Eg-S significantly sharper showing focus than the merely Precision Eg-D?

At smaller lens apertures, say f-4, f-5.6 and smaller, do either the Eg-D or Eg-S darken objectionably to the point of uselessness?

Anything else I'm not thinking to ask?
---
A little insight to my camera operation style, I go back to the film days, the only things I miss about film are the loading, rewinding and release tricks to get multiple exposures. And I'm quite happy to miss them, right along with automotive carburetor and valve adjustments though I still far prefer driving a stick.

Autofocus to me is a gimicky luxury, I do not expect autofocus to take photos for me. At the first sign of autofocus wavering, manual I engage. I'd much rather manual focus than dink around with shifting autofocus points instead of activating the shutter. I have little (read, no) interest in even learning how to shift autofocus points, yeah, I'm that old.

Constantijn · Jul 17, 2013

I have an interesting dilemma that I’d like all your experts opinion on. Quite recently I’ve upgraded from a Nikon DX camera to a Canon 5DIII, what a joy this is! Only I have to, of course, get a complete set of lenses as well. Since my name is not Rockefeller budget is an issue.
What I already have is a 50mm 1.4 and recently I bought the 17-40mm 4.0. I’m really pleased with both lenses but I miss a telelens. My primary use would be for travelling, I do get to go to the Kruger National Park in South-Africa every second year so I need some range, I want to use it for other travelling as well as sports events as well. My thoughts move between a 70-200mm II lens with a 2x convertor for the long range (don’t need it all the time) or a 100-400mm lens. I’ve read on this site that there’s a rumour that this last lens might be replaced soon, is this worth waiting for?

optikus · Jul 17, 2013

Good morning, forum!

In the german "Digicamclub"-forum for manuel lenses on digital cameras we developped a special adapter to use the ancient M39-Lenses for the "teacher's Leica" Paxette, manufactured by Braun, Nürnberg also with Canon EOS bodies. There are Lenses from Steinheil (Muenchen), Schneider (Kreuznach), Roeschlein (Kreuznach), Enna (München), Braun and Staeble (Nürnberg) and other well known german manufacturers on the market.

Due to the longer flange-distance (compared to LTM) of 44mm it is possible to make adapters which allow infinity-focusing correctly.

If interested you will find an actual information (in german) here:

Werte Forenkolleginnen und Kollegen,

wir hatten vor einiger Zeit das Thema Adaption der M39-Objektive der Paxette (Auflagemaß nominal 44mm) an das EOS-System.

Dazu gab es im Digicamclub eine fruchtbare Diskussion, die zur Herstellung einer Messing-Kleinserie von speziellen M39-EOS-Adaptern geführt hat, die eine Eindrehung erhalten haben, so dass eine korrekte Unendlich-Einstellung möglich ist. Die meisten (nicht alle !) Paxette-Objektive lassen sich einwandfrei am EF-S-Bajonett der APS-C-Kameras nutzen, eine Reihe auch am EF-Bajonett der Vollformatkameras. Lediglich die Objektive mit verlängertem Hinterbau scheiden ohne auszugsverlängerndes Zubehör aus und bleiben damit dem Makro-Bereich vorbehalten.

Thread -> http://www.digicamclub.de/showthread...998#post195998

Wer mehr über das Thema und seine Anfänge erfahren möchte:

- http://www.digicamclub.de/showthread...axette+adapter
- http://www.digicamclub.de/showthread...hlight=telexon
- http://www.digicamclub.de/showthread...l=1#post175541

Im Digicamclub gibt es darüber hinaus - Stichwort VNex - einiges mehr zur Verwendung dieser Objektive am NEX-System.

If there is any interest contact me, some of these adapters are still available.

Joerg

beckstoy · Jul 16, 2013

Alright everyone, I shoot portraits and weddings and here are my current lenses which I use on my 5DM3:

24-105 (great kit lens, but I might sell it)
24-70 f2.8 MK2
50 f1.4
(Sigma) 12-24 - some people don't like this, but I think I got a good copy
70-200 f2.8 MK2

I'm trying to find a reason to buy either the 85mm or 135mm. Which should I buy? I know I have that length covered, but they're such celebrated primes that I'd just learn to zoom with my feet more and I know my results would be good.

So, here's my question. Both are very well-loved in the photog world, especially with portrait shooters. Which should I get? Or, should I be considering another prime altogether?

Thanks in advance!

rlaverty · Jul 16, 2013

I will preface this post by saying this kit would be about 25lbs and $25,000 but its fun to dream ;D
So 2 bodies, 4 lenses.....

Future 7D2
Future Big megapixel/full-frame of choice
21 Zeiss
24-70 II
70-200(whatever incarnation works for you)
200-400(drool) would only need to take off the 7D2 if you needed 200-320

Probably .1% could carry or afford this but it came to me hiking the other day and thought i would share because having the ability to get basically a 21- 900mm focal length (unless my math is wrong) with incredible IQ sounds awesome. Discuss

Mick · Jul 16, 2013

Just wanted to say that I got my printer and paper profiled, my screen calibrated and in well over 150 prints ive never had a single problem with ink blockages or printer problems. I use genuine ink (ouch) but the quality is outstanding and the damm thing just works every time. Best A3 printer ive ever owned.

Canon Rumors · Jul 16, 2013

HTML:

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14007"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=14007">Tweet</a></div>
<p><strong>From Magic Lantern

</strong>The Magic Lantern team is letting the world know that they are at the beginning of a new function for the 5D Mark III and EOS 7D. Apparently they’ve figured out a way to boost dynamic range by 3 stops by using a new way of making a photograph by using ISO 100 for some of the vertical lines and ISO 1600 for the rest of it. Sounds wild to us, not sure how they’re doing that. There will be a process to combining the lines of 100/1600 ISO to give you the full resolution file.</p>
<p><strong>From Alex at ML</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Works for both photos and raw videos on Canon EOS 5D Mark III. On Canon EOS 7D, photo only (since it can’t do raw video).</em></li>
<li><em>What are the benefits? more dynamic range (less shadow noise).</em></li>
<li><em>The functionality was not really in Canon firmware, but in the chip that samples the sensor. Canon firmware does not make any use of it (they just set both ISO “registers” to the same value). It was implemented on the hardware side though (and that’s why it works only on these 2 cameras, because only they have two ISO amplifiers).</em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://blog.planet5d.com/2013/07/magic-lantern-improves-canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-dynamic-range-to-14-stops-major-landmark/" target="_blank">Read more at Planet5D</a> | <a href="http://www.magiclantern.fm/" target="_blank">Visit Magic Lantern</a></strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

fugu82 · Jul 16, 2013

I don't currently carry a flash at all, and the only standard one I own is a 380EX, which actually kinda works with my 5D3, but is possibly just a little dated :-\. But occasionally I think that owning something for some discrete fill or freezing action would be nice. So what are some good options out there these days? [Doesn't have to be Canon, or cheap, so long as it plays well with my 5D3]. Thanx in advance.

ND40 · Jul 16, 2013

First post, long time viewer.

I bought a EOS-M in the recently $299 B&H sale. So far I've just used it with my kit 22 f2 lens and am very pleased with the image quality if not the autofocus speed.

Today I tried it out with the EF lens adapter and some of my EF lenses. I was very surprised to find that the M takes sharper images than my 6D! I experimented with both my 24-105 f4 lens and 135 f2. I tried both autofucus and live view focus with the 6D and compared with Flexizone single AF on the M.

Attached are some 100% crops of the pictures I took. What do you think? Is there something wrong with my 6D?

The pictures are in this order, all taken with a 135mm f2 L lens:
EOS-M Flexizone single AF
EOS-6D Autofocus
EOS-6D Live View focus manual

Cariboucoach · Jul 16, 2013

With the price of the 6D falling, and the reported price for the soon to be released 70D, would it make more sense to buy both of those cameras versus buying just the 5D III?

With the two cameras, you would have a built in back up if one breaks down, you have the "Reach" of a crop sensor, hopefully great video, low noise at high ISO, fast FPS, etc... Where is the down side to buying two instead of one camera?

Leo

cervantes · Jul 16, 2013

That is a question I recently asked myself. After some research on Wikipedia I found an easy formula which one can use to calculate the diameter of the circle of confusion at a given magnification:

blur disk diameter =~ (focal length * subject magnification)/aperture number

If a constant magnification is used the lenses can be compared in regard to the strength of their background blur.
I created a quick excel sheet with the common canon prime lenses and calculated the numbers - as you can see I normalized the result to the 50mm f1.4 (this means the 50mm 1.4 delivers a coc radius of 1) since this is a very well known lens.

It seems that if you want really strong background blur you need to go with one of the big whites. I also marked the 200mm f2.8 II which is the black lens with maximum coc diameter (the 70-200 f2.8 II @200 would be the same).

Please note that these numbers are only valid at
subject distance >> focal length (--> "normal" distance - opposed to closeup)
so the mentioned macro lenses could deliver a much stronger blur at maximum magnification.

chasinglight · Jul 16, 2013

Hi, I currently shoot with the canon 7d. I have the 15-85 which I use for landscapes, all around lens, and occasionally portraits; the 50 1.8 which I use for shallow DoF and low light work; 100-400 which I use for birds and wildlife; and the 70-200 f4 IS which I use occasionally for portraits and landscapes.

My question is if you had a choice of whether to add the 6D to the line up (for most shooting except wildlife) or buy a fast zoom like the 24-70 2.8 (version 1) which would you do? I like the idea of the 6D because it will create cleaner images, provide better low light performance for family events, and will allow me to use the 70-200 more as I find the focal length either too long or too short on crop (never just right). At the same time, just getting the 24-70 would give me better low light performance and shallow DoF for events where lighting is not ideal.

Part of me says to get the 24-70 first as I would need a standard zoom on the 6D, but part of me really wants to try out full frame. I thought about just getting an old 5Dc to try out full frame, but I figured it was more worth the money to get a current model camera. The 5D3 is currently more than I would like to spend if anyone was thinking to suggest that instead. Thoughts?!?

Threads

Threads

Locked 5D Mark II composition movement

Locked Has anyone received their 1Dx recall body back yet?

Locked ND filters /waterfalls on 5D3

Locked Poll Poll How much better would the 5D mkIV have to be for you to upgrade from your mkiii?

What upgraded feature would push you to get the mkIV?

Double the battery life?

WIFI, Bluetooth, GPS, etc.

120 double cross type AF points???

2 stops of improved and usable ISO performance (low light capabilities).

A 32 megapixel sensor and a 50mb RAW file.

Locked Photographer Gets So Close to Lava That His Shoes and Tripod Catch on Fire

Locked EOS M Stock & Shipping Update

Locked Cheap telephoto lens

Locked Canon Germany Teaser

Locked Different new lenses?

Locked The Canon EOS 8D Rumors [CR0]

Locked Travel photos and help 5Dc, 40D or a rebel for beginer?

Locked Sigma 18-35mm 1.8

Locked poor battery connection and delay in consecutive shutter clicks

Locked 6d focusing screen comparison please

Locked 70-200mm 2.8 IS II vs 100-400mm

Locked Using vintage Braun Paxette lenses with EOS bodies

Locked 85L or 135L?

Locked Fantasy Dayhiking Kit

Locked Canon 3000 Pixma Pro MK2 Perfect printer

Locked Magic Lantern Improves 5D Mark III Dynamic Range to 14 Stops

Locked Flash Recommendations for an Existing Light Photographer

Locked EOS-M sharper than 6D?

Attachments

Locked 70D + 6D vs. 5D mark III

Locked What lens delivers the strongest background blur?

Attachments

Locked Move to full frame (6D) or New Lens?

Filter

Forum statistics

Latest albums

Gallery statistics

Locked

5D Mark II composition movement

Locked

Has anyone received their 1Dx recall body back yet?

Locked

ND filters /waterfalls on 5D3

Locked

Poll

How much better would the 5D mkIV have to be for you to upgrade from your mkiii?

Locked

Photographer Gets So Close to Lava That His Shoes and Tripod Catch on Fire

Locked

EOS M Stock & Shipping Update

Locked

Cheap telephoto lens

Locked

Canon Germany Teaser

Locked

Different new lenses?

Locked

The Canon EOS 8D Rumors [CR0]

Locked

Travel photos and help 5Dc, 40D or a rebel for beginer?

Locked

Sigma 18-35mm 1.8

Locked

poor battery connection and delay in consecutive shutter clicks

Locked

6d focusing screen comparison please

Locked

70-200mm 2.8 IS II vs 100-400mm

Locked

Using vintage Braun Paxette lenses with EOS bodies

Locked

85L or 135L?

Locked

Fantasy Dayhiking Kit

Locked

Canon 3000 Pixma Pro MK2 Perfect printer

Locked

Magic Lantern Improves 5D Mark III Dynamic Range to 14 Stops

Locked

Flash Recommendations for an Existing Light Photographer

Locked

EOS-M sharper than 6D?

Locked

70D + 6D vs. 5D mark III

Locked

What lens delivers the strongest background blur?

Locked

Move to full frame (6D) or New Lens?