I could WANT a 45MP R3 but SETTLE for a 24MP R3, that certainly wouldn't make the R3 inferior and certainly wouldn't justify me selling all of my Canon gear to buy, say, a Sony A1. The only point I was making was that just because Canon puts out a product and that product sells doesn't mean every person who bought said camera was 100% satisfied with its feature set. Sometimes people settle for a camera that doesn't tick all the boxes but because the cons don't outweigh the pros, it wouldn't be considered inferior by any means. Make sense?Yes it is a serious question. You said lots folks "settle" for Canon. You also said they are buying cameras they don't necessarily want. These are your words not mine. Maybe you didn't mean it that way. Who knows?
Upvote
0