For a very affordable R, that's not a bad idea. Canon currently makes APS-H industrial sensors.aps-h
bwahahahahahahahaha...you have got to admit, it would be a fanboi disruptor.
Upvote
0
For a very affordable R, that's not a bad idea. Canon currently makes APS-H industrial sensors.aps-h
bwahahahahahahahaha...you have got to admit, it would be a fanboi disruptor.
Canon already has one, the M50. In Japan, the M50 is called Kiss M. Kiss is what Canon calls Rebel DSLRs in Japan.A mirrorless Rebel.
...
Really how many hobbyists will spend USD $3,900 on a camera body and then thousands more on lenses ?
...
So you think this ist an option at all? I 'd love to see more M bodies, especially small/cheap M bodies, but I somehow doubt we will see more than a few minor updates to make the disscontinuation of this system leess abrupt. Is there any indication the EOS M system is not dead?
I'm assuming it's a rectro style camera similar to the sony and fuji and the new Nikon Zfc. So yea fan boy cry lol
Oh no...A *low* MP version of the R3.
You don't like 24 MP? OK, here's SIX megapixels. If you keep whining, we'll drop it down to 640 kilopixels!
Tiktok pleaseWe had a "print" button that people loved to hate...
How about a "publish to Insta" button
The new powershots have an option to stream straight to youtube, it would be nice to have that on the EOS family as well. Making sharing images easier is a good thing, when I'm out shooting alone, my 5yo loves to see pictures of the dragonflies and butterflies I encounter. With the Camera Connect App it's straight forward, but it takes a few minutes to get the connection up, send it to the phone, put it in a message, etc.We had a "print" button that people loved to hate...
How about a "publish to Insta" button
I like #3. Like the Sigma. Minimal size weight and cost full frame.My serious guesses:
1. Touch pad shutter button (as described in a patent which surfaced months ago).
2. a retro style camera with old tech
3. A super affordable, small FF body with no EVF
4. A camera with built-in
machine based image editing (like in SP) to compete with apple, Samsung, Huawei etc
I really think all three options are actually possible. I figure that No 1 would be the most controversial because I really changes the way we/ one take(s) a picture.
No 4 would be considered “controversial” altough it basically would simply transfer the technique most people take images with to a DSLM.