Continue reading...
Last edited:
So a small battery for an EOS M product? Or a small APS-c RF mount camera?
In the Central/South USA you might get into name copyright problems with a certain soda maker.APS-C EOS R - The RC
In the Central/South USA you might get into name copyright problems with a certain soda maker.
Or that it's a Cinema version, similar to a 1DC.The other issue with that name is some might assume that the body doesn't have any buttons other than on/off.
Unlike the M6 II which does 14fps in RAW at 32MP at 1/6.5 the price....It shoots 30MP's at 13fps in RAW At 1/6th of the price of the EOS 1DX MKII
The battery doesn't tell us much except that this won't be the 7D III replacement and that it is unlikely to be Full Frame (The RP uses LP-E17, but nothing else with that sensor size does). The current Rebels use LP-E17 as well, it is not a mirrorless only battery.with that battery it has to be another M series. My bet would be somewhere below the M6 II
The battery doesn't tell us much except that this won't be the 7D III replacement and that it is unlikely to be Full Frame (The RP uses LP-E17, but nothing else with that sensor size does). The current Rebels use LP-E17 as well, it is not a mirrorless only battery.
As long as it is cheaper to make them than to sell them, Canon will continue to sell them. Making money is a good point. We got a 90D because the M6 II can't properly replace it. And I think the higher end APS-C market is less likely to get updates because of Canon's desire to push people into FF - see lack of an M5 II and 7D III (Though these may be coming still, who knows).Do you think there is even a point in continuation of development of Rebels? I understand the Pro OVF demanding crowd still in the market for DSLRs. But bloggers, hobbyists and occasional shooters should be served well with Canon mirrorless. eos M and R series???