• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Canon Announces EF 16-35 f/2.8L III & EF 24-105 f/4L IS II

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,874
5,707
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<strong>From the 5D Mark IV Press Release:</strong>

In addition to the new EOS 5D Mark IV DSLR, Canon is also introducing two EF-Series L-series lenses as well as a variety of EOS accessories. The new EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Ultra-Wide Zoom Lens features a large diameter GMO dual surface aspherical lens and ground aspherical lens, f/2.8 aperture throughout the entire zoom range, fluorine coating, improved durability and is dust and water resistant. The new EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Standard Zoom lens features an improved four-stop image stabilization as well as ghosting and flare reduction with air sphere coating. The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Ultra-Wide Zoom Lens is scheduled to be available late in October for an estimated retail price of $2,199.00 and the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM  Standard Zoom Lens is scheduled to be available in late October for an estimated retail price of $1,099.00.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Preorder Links Below</p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

</strong><em>Shipping in late October, 2016</em><strong>

</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>USA </strong><em>$2199</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1274708-REG/canon_ef_16_35mm_f_2_8l_iii.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2bPL0jq">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA16353.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/2bkKGfQ">Canon Store</a> | <a href="http://mpex.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-iii-lens.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></li>
<li><strong>UK </strong><em>£2349</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://tidd.ly/97c26534">Park Cameras</a> | <strong>Germany:</strong> Calumet</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM

</strong><em>Shipping in late October, 2016</em><strong>

</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>USA </strong><em>$1099</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1274709-REG/canon_ef_24_105mm_f_4l_is.html/BI/2466/KBID/3296">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2bpjIRq">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA241052.html?KBID=64393">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/2bIZnYi">Canon Store</a> | <a href="http://mpex.com/canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4l-is-ii-lens.html?acc=3">Midwest Photo</a></li>
<li><strong>UK </strong><em>£1129</em><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://tidd.ly/c633e78d">Park Cameras</a> | <strong>Germany:</strong> Calumet</li>
</ul>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 25%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-26584 gallery-columns-4 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0244093010.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0244093010-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="0244093010" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0244093010-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0244093010-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0412440779.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0412440779-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="0412440779" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0412440779-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/0412440779-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6371972109.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6371972109-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="6371972109" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6371972109-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6371972109-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8993703593.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8993703593-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="8993703593" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8993703593-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8993703593-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
 
MTF'S!!

16-35 II

2680a04430606b4253ff76db3921a449.png


16-35 III

4a38fceb19807575e1d00f63af0d1026.png


16-35/4

db757a60257972056dc9d0b9f50b1b94.png
 
Upvote 0
That's a pretty massive improvement on the 16-35 III. It looks just as good if not better than the 16-35 f/4 except at f/2.8. Should be a killer lens, will have to wait and see the coma, though a little expensive compared to the competition.

The 24-105 is a little bit of a let down. It really doesn't look that much better. Maybe a little bit in the corners, but that's it. Though I want to see some sample images of the bokeh, star burst and flare since the original lacked in those areas.
 
Upvote 0
nightscape123 said:
That's a pretty massive improvement on the 16-35 III. It looks just as good if not better than the 16-35 f/4 except at f/2.8. Should be a killer lens, will have to wait and see the coma, though a little expensive compared to the competition.

The 24-105 is a little bit of a let down. It really doesn't look that much better. Maybe a little bit in the corners, but that's it. Though I want to see some sample images of the bokeh, star burst and flare since the original lacked in those areas.
+1
Waiting for lens tip to test the 16-35. The 24-105 sharpness not much improved, but the press release is saying less vignetting than previous version.
 
Upvote 0
Prior to pricing being announced, I was hopeful that this new 16-35 might drive down the street price of used f/4 variants. Hopeful that a number of f/4 owners ditch that lens to get the latest/greatest. However, I'm figuring the $2200 price tag just puts these two lenses in clearly different markets.
 
Upvote 0
That 16-35 improvement looks impressive! Now I wait for coma testing as that will determine whether the f2.8 or the f4 will be my next UWA lens. I suspect the coma will be 'good enough' for me and it will be a matter of how long do I have to wait until I can afford it :o
 
Upvote 0
Luds34 said:
Prior to pricing being announced, I was hopeful that this new 16-35 might drive down the street price of used f/4 variants. Hopeful that a number of f/4 owners ditch that lens to get the latest/greatest. However, I'm figuring the $2200 price tag just puts these two lenses in clearly different markets.

2200$?? You lucky guys over there....

It will cost 2625€ in Germany... (close to 3000$!)

I guess the replacement of my old Mark II will have to wait a bit..
 
Upvote 0