Just had my CPS email:
If they want to keep calling it the IS, why not just make one:
If they want to keep calling it the IS, why not just make one:
Dylan777 said:It's out there....somewhere ;D
Drizzt321 said:Somewhere over the rainbow, I'm dreaming of a 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMDylan777 said:It's out there....somewhere ;D
Drizzt321 said:Dylan777 said:It's out there....somewhere ;D
Somewhere over the rainbow, I'm dreaming of a 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM
wickidwombat said:If they made them I would more than likely buy 2
:-[
M.ST said:..................A lot of platinum members (me included) are not very happy with the 5D Mark III and wants a real replacement for the 1Ds Mark III.
........................
optikus said:8) Hi together,
yes, the price might be hard voodoo, but by the way, audi makes the "R8" not as a "TT"-competitor - and sells both. The advantages of a very fast, top quality zoom in this focal length area with top IS are not to discuss - 2 - 4 more stops down would be a signifikant point, together with the low light performance of the actual EOS bodies it opens more and more scenes for available light shooting - that would be the major argument for me to buy one - and I'm not alone, I think.
Jörg