I'm a non-conformistbriansquibb said:Seems we have two camps forming here. Those that have it and love it, and those that haven't got and can see nothing but problems even though the reviews praise it for the low price and high IQ
briansquibb said:Seems we have two camps forming here. Those that have it and love it, and those that haven't got and can see nothing but problems even though the reviews praise it for the low price and high IQ
Jarques said:
Thank you!drjlo said:Those are some nice photo's you got from the 40. I'm sure the 40 wide open (2.8) is sharper than 50 1.8 wide open (1.8), but is 50 sharper at 2.8? I also feel exactly the same as you wrote:
"The 40mm is comparable to the 50mm 1.8 in terms of smooth bokeh, but with the 50mm 1.8 you gain a shallower depth of field which makes me wish that Canon gave this little 40mm an f-stop of 2 or even a 1.8."
Jarques said:Thank you!drjlo said:Those are some nice photo's you got from the 40. I'm sure the 40 wide open (2.8) is sharper than 50 1.8 wide open (1.8), but is 50 sharper at 2.8? I also feel exactly the same as you wrote:
"The 40mm is comparable to the 50mm 1.8 in terms of smooth bokeh, but with the 50mm 1.8 you gain a shallower depth of field which makes me wish that Canon gave this little 40mm an f-stop of 2 or even a 1.8."
That is a good question about sharpness with both at 2.8. I have some testing out to do tonight!
What camera do you have? How much did you spend on the 50?R1-7D said:Jarques said:Thank you!drjlo said:Those are some nice photo's you got from the 40. I'm sure the 40 wide open (2.8) is sharper than 50 1.8 wide open (1.8), but is 50 sharper at 2.8? I also feel exactly the same as you wrote:
"The 40mm is comparable to the 50mm 1.8 in terms of smooth bokeh, but with the 50mm 1.8 you gain a shallower depth of field which makes me wish that Canon gave this little 40mm an f-stop of 2 or even a 1.8."
That is a good question about sharpness with both at 2.8. I have some testing out to do tonight!
Please report back as soon as you can. I just ordered a refurbished 50, but I might send it back and get a 40 instead.



Personally, don't change your order. The 50mm 1.8 is a great little lens and an awesome addition to your lens collection.R1-7D said:I have a 5D2 and 7D. I spent about $100 including shipping.
It's a cheap lens, but once the bokeh is tamed it's a great lens for the money.briansquibb said:Jarques said:Personally, don't change your order. The 50mm 1.8 is a great little lens and an awesome addition to your lens collection.R1-7D said:I have a 5D2 and 7D. I spent about $100 including shipping.
50 f/1.8 - shame about the nasty bokeh though - just look at those round christmas lights
It can be a little harsh at times, but the bokeh balls are nice and round:briansquibb said:Those 50 f/1.8 bokeh nasties are not present with the shorty forty