whothafunk said:
dilbert said:
The shortest period (so far) between professional level DSLRs being released by Canon is 15 months (the 1D Mark II N). The 1D Mark II lasted 7 quarters and then there was the 1D Mark IV that about 2 years. Even Canon's first full frame camera (1Ds) lasted less than 2 years - and that was a $8000 camera.
Visit
http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/rumours.html and scroll down to the Canon DSLR Timeline to learn some history.
Sure. But by the looks of it, that's an old habit. Look at the gap with 7D to 7D2, 5D2 to 5D3 to 5D4, 1DX to 1DX2, 6D to 6D2, 60D to 70D, etc.
a few things happened .. looks like canon updated a fab. there was an earthquake/tsunami that hit japan...
canon went four years with the 18mp derivatives, and then in basically 18 months came out with 3 different APS-C sensors. (70D sensor, 7D2 sensor, 760D sensor). they may make it 4 in 2 years if the 80D is a 24Mp DPAF sensor.
next september the 7D2 would be 3 years old, that fits with the timelines that pro/prosumer bodies in the past were updated around every 3 years.
there could have been alot of things held up because canon was waiting for patents to process if they are indeed serious about updating their sensors with ADC's.
we'll certainly have more a clue when the 80D comes out, but it's not that far out out there. canon in the past has done short term around if it felt there was enough change to do a new camera body. it's actually better for canon to do short term around on cameras if they feel there's enough sales benefit to do so.
realistically the "must update" is the 80D,SL1, 5D,6D,760D, 1DC, 7D2 - by next september? not really a stretch.
if canon did indeed catch up to sony, i would hope they would refresh their product line in relatively short order to shut everyone up.