Yah, you can do that, but you don't actually need to know the pixel count if you just want to know how it scales. For a rectangle, regardless of its aspect ratio, sqrt(area scaling factor)=the linear scaling factor. Alternately if you want to know how much scaling both linear dimensions will affect area, simply square the linear scaling factor.
My apologies, but I don't understand how all your previous statements line up. Why did you mention 45mp as a requirement for jumping on the R1 in a heartbeat and not 30mp?
I was really happy with my RP. I think for someone wanting a small FF camera the form is fantastic, one of the most comfortable cameras I’ve had to hold, with the extension piece, and I’m sure Canon are onto a winner with it and the mark 2 version - the R8.
It was already explained above in the thread, but it's interesting you didn't bother to actually take a square root of 1.5. Had you done so, you'd see the exact-exact multiplier.
What about other multipliers? What if one camera has 3 times the number of megapixels? Or 2.6 times as many? To help with that, perhaps someone could make a table of square roots. I bet there's already one on the internet.
Better still, have a telephoto lens calibrated as a cylindrical slide rule as an extra. Perhaps @InchMetric could help design it.What about other multipliers? What if one camera has 3 times the number of megapixels? Or 2.6 times as many? To help with that, perhaps someone could make a table of square roots. I bet there's already one on the internet.
Sure enough...I found a square root table.
View attachment 214719
Ok, so maybe it's more of a cube root table...that would be useful for 3D imaging when comparing resolution of sensors with different MVs (megavoxels).
Alright, here's a hard right turn, but I had my mind blown by this a while back. 3D Systems is a company that sells 3D printers, but their real end game is developing bio-compatible materials to support human organ transplants. The lattice structure they printed as a support for lung generation using stem cells consists of, and I quote, "44 million individual parts (voxels)." Except, I'm sorry, that was a typo. It's really 44 million with a "T."Ok, so maybe it's more of a cube root table...that would be useful for 3D imaging when comparing resolution of sensors with different MVs (megavoxels).
www.3dnatives.com
No. Evidently you can’t count, the flagship is still the 5DsR.
Isn’t it the ship that has the group commander on board? Will every R1 come with a tiny admiral inside?
Yes, you're correct...if you define flagship soley by megapickles.
I think you're correct there! Probably why the cost will be high, to pay their salary!
If you read the source article, it mentions having both the mirror assembly and the hot sho(t/e) come lose. That is a big indication that the author doesn’t know what ‘mirrorless’ actually means and their 5D had problems.The R5 already has a hotshot, according to the Camera Insider: “EOS R5 Hotshot Comes Lose” (see here).
I’ve looked everywhere for mine, but I can’t find the hotshot that is supposed to come with my R5. Probably shirking to avoid carrying my photo backpack and tripod
I remember that, but I didn't pay a lot of attention since it seemed like it was either completely fiction or too much exaggeration.
I was expecting a high resolution studio type camera. While 30 mpix on my R has been great, I expected more resolution from the R1.
