Here are the Canon EOS M6 Specifications

[Canon Rumors]

<strong>Canon EOS M6 Specifications (Google Translated): </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Number of effective pixels: Approximately 24.2 million pixels</li>
<li>Processor: DIGIC 7</li>
<li>Dual Pixel AF</li>
<li>AF point: 49 points</li>
<li>Max FPS: 7 frames / sec (AF fixed: 9 frames / sec)</li>
<li>ISO: 100 to 25600</li>
<li>Shutter speed: 1/4000-30</li>
<li>Sync Speed: 1/200 second</li>
<li>Video: Full HD, HD, VGA</li>
<li>LCD: 3.0 type tilt type touch panel</li>
<li>Size: 112.0 × 68.0 × 44.5 mm</li>
<li>Recording medium: SD / SDHC / SDXC card</li>
<li>Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth</li>
<li>Color: Black / Silver</li>
<li>Battery: LP-E17</li>
<li>Kit: Body – EF-M 15-45mm kit – EF-M 18-150mm kit</li>
</ul>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 25%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-28250 gallery-columns-4 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eosm6_black_003.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eosm6_black_003-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eosm6_black_001.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eosm6_black_001-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/canon_br-e1_001.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/canon_br-e1_001-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/canon_evf_dc2_black_001.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/canon_evf_dc2_black_001-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

 

[Sidepod]

no dpaf?

 

[hachu21]

AF

The 7 fps with AF and 9fps without are the same than M5... So I guess (hope) the DPAF is on board.

 

[midluk]

Re: AF

So I guess (hope) the DPAF is on board.

If it had DPAF, there would be no need for "AF point: 49 points".

 

[Zv]

Re: AF

So I guess (hope) the DPAF is on board.

If it had DPAF, there would be no need for "AF point: 49 points".

No true.

Below is a screenshot of the M5 specifications. As you can see from Canon's own website they mention 49 AF points even though it has DPAF. You still need to select an AF area and there 49 of those, apparently.

 

[Sharlin]

So it really is exactly like the M5 sans a builtin EVF. Not exactly what I expected, but I presume vloggers will be very happy with the LCD that pivots up this time. I wonder what the price point will be.

 

[davidj]

I don't mean to brag, but http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=31844.msg648710#msg648710

 

[pokerz]

Add up Flip Screen = next generation

 

[Bernard]

So it really is exactly like the M5 sans a builtin EVF.

I think of it more as an M3, updated with the M5's sensor and processor.

I really like my M3, so I'm not complaining. I would like to know if the M3's external viewfinder will work on the M5.

 

[C-A430]

So it really is exactly like the M5 sans a builtin EVF.

I think of it more as an M3, updated with the M5's sensor and processor.

I really like my M3, so I'm not complaining. I would like to know if the M3's external viewfinder will work on the M5.

If understood this right it is actually Rebels' sensor not one from M5?

Something like M3 body + rebel sensor + some stuff from M5 placing it exactly between M5 and M10.

 

[rrcphoto]

I'm thinking more and more that it's the same M5 sensor. reason being is that there is no mention of Hybrid CMOS III or IV focusing.

all the other spec leaks have included that, also the main specs for M3 have that

 

[Sharlin]

So it really is exactly like the M5 sans a builtin EVF.

I think of it more as an M3, updated with the M5's sensor and processor.

I really like my M3, so I'm not complaining. I would like to know if the M3's external viewfinder will work on the M5.

Sure, the form factor is M3 but I expected the M6 to be positioned a step below the M5, feature-wise. But the leaked specs are 100% that of the M5. I guess there might still be some software differences but it doesn't look like it.

 

[rrcphoto]

If understood this right it is actually Rebels' sensor not one from M5?

there's no real indication either way. the specs posted could be from either the M3 or the m5.

the only curious omission is that there is no hybrid cmos III AF mentioned, so that may indicate it's a DPAF sensor. but since the specs are so incomplete, it could go either way at this time.

there is one thing to note..

the M3 was really 100-12800 as canon doesn't list the High settings as part of it's core ISO range. The spec leaks of the m3 were 100-12800, not 100-25600.


the M5 didn't have expanded mode ISO and was 100-25600 and was leaked / listed as such.

 

[ExodistPhotography]

I am still confused on the naming scheme.. How can they call it a M6, when the M5 could be the higher end and the M6 actually be the upgrade for the M3.. :-\

Was the backlash over the flip down screen so bad they had to rush out new M in less then a year??


""Why Mr Anderson, why why!!""


If Canon is so persistent with the little M, why do they not just release a mirrorless FF with the 5DSR or 5D4 sensor and DPAF that uses EF lenses?? <-- this is what we all really want...

 

[Sharlin]

I am still confused on the naming scheme.. How can they call it a M6, when the M5 could be the higher end and the M6 actually be the upgrade for the M3.. :-\

Apparently they revamped the naming scheme to better match the DSLR naming after the "practice models" that were the M, M2 and M3. Smaller number == higher-end model.

 

[ahsanford]

So it really is exactly like the M5 sans a builtin EVF. Not exactly what I expected, but I presume vloggers will be very happy with the LCD that pivots up this time. I wonder what the price point will be.

Spec-wise it is an M5 minus viewfinder, but size-wise it is much more M3 like.

- A

 

[1kind]

M6 is the same as the M5 and spec wise (80D sensor, DPAF, etc.). As others have stated, no built-in EVF. I guess people complained about the EVF being in the way and not being able to tilt up that when you mount the M5 to a tripod, tilting the screen down is not ideal.

So essentially, its a M5 in a M3 form factor. Those concerned about naming convention, how else would the name it? They won't name it a M4. It's definitely an upgrade from M3. M5.5 doesn't sound right either or be confusing. So M6 is logical.

 

[ahsanford]

M6 is the same as the M5 and spec wise (80D sensor, DPAF, etc.).

As I understand it, the 100% spec likeness to the M5 has everyone convinced that we'll have DPAF but that specific feature has not yet been confirmed.

I think it will be there, but we have yet to see that confirmed in a spec list.

- A

 

[1kind]

M6 is the same as the M5 and spec wise (80D sensor, DPAF, etc.).

As I understand it, the 100% spec likeness to the M5 has everyone convinced that we'll have DPAF but that specific feature has not yet been confirmed.

I think it will be there, but we have yet to see that confirmed in a spec list.

- A

I know a lot of people complained about the screen tilting down and being blocked by the tripod. Not to mention, it wouldn't even fully fold down because the ball head would of been in the way.

So Canon removing features after 4 months of the M5's release would be stupid. The specs itself is exactly the same, just in a M3 body.

I was going to buy the M5 to replace my G1 X Mark II but didn't because of the way the screen folded. I use it for blogging and my YouTube overviews/unboxing and it would of been hard to do. I also don't use the EVF on smaller cameras.

 

[mangobutter]

Canon needs to design 50mm equivalent lenses like the Fuji 35 1.4/2. A 28mm equivalent and a ultra wide prime. Canon your mirrorless lens lineup sucks. And your 15-45mm 24-70 equivalent sucks too. Super soft.

The 22/2 is a gem (though needs an update, excessive CA at all apertures), but other than that Canon your mirrorless lens lineup sucks. Bad.