List of rumored lenses

  • Thread starter Thread starter ROBOTTI2009
  • Start date Start date
aznable said:
Razor2012 said:
briansquibb said:
Razor2012 said:
I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap. There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice. ;)

16-35 on ff is as wide as the much praised 10-22 ef-s thing

True. Canon needs their own 'Holy Trinity'. ;)

holy trinity.... :D

i have some nikon friends that use this

Heh yep, Nikon has it first. Damn, lol.
 
Upvote 0
Birdshooter said:
I would rather have a 10-600 f/2 perfectly alligned for an APS-C, weighing not more than 500 gram, which has perfect image quality, no vingetting or CA at all, fully sharp wide open, and is delivered as a kit lens.

Sold seperately for under $1000.

Likelyness it is going to happen? About the same as other suggestions made here :D

You forgot it also needs to be a pancake :-)
 
Upvote 0
Razor2012 said:
aznable said:
Razor2012 said:
briansquibb said:
Razor2012 said:
I'm hoping for something in that 10/14-24 range also...to fill in that bottom end gap. There is the 16-35, but doesn't fit in as nice. ;)

16-35 on ff is as wide as the much praised 10-22 ef-s thing

True. Canon needs their own 'Holy Trinity'. ;)

holy trinity.... :D

i have some nikon friends that use this

Heh yep, Nikon has it first. Damn, lol.

they are crazy :D
 
Upvote 0
kdsand said:
Birdshooter said:
I would rather have a 10-600 f/2 perfectly alligned for an APS-C, weighing not more than 500 gram, which has perfect image quality, no vingetting or CA at all, fully sharp wide open, and is delivered as a kit lens.

Sold seperately for under $1000.

Likelyness it is going to happen? About the same as other suggestions made here :D

You forgot it also needs to be a pancake :-)
You also forgot that it has to have IS, tilt, shift and macro capabilities too ;D
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
kdsand said:
Birdshooter said:
I would rather have a 10-600 f/2 perfectly alligned for an APS-C, weighing not more than 500 gram, which has perfect image quality, no vingetting or CA at all, fully sharp wide open, and is delivered as a kit lens.

Sold seperately for under $1000.

Likelyness it is going to happen? About the same as other suggestions made here :D
You forgot it also needs to be a pancake :-)
You also forgot that it has to have IS, tilt, shift and macro capabilities too ;D
Wouldn't buy, no soft focus!
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
Nishi Drew said:
Viggo said:
Not a word anymore about the 35 L II?

I think Sigma has that covered ;)
Hey! It is a Canon site :)

Yeah, I actually thought the new Siggy looked cool, they've taken a big step, by the looks of it at least. I couldn't really locate if it was weathersealed or not.

What you guys think, does it top the current 35 L? Af and wideopen performance are my biggest points.
 
Upvote 0