C
canonrumorstony
Guest
Re: Odds & Ends: 70D, 7D2, New Full Frame, D600 & Photoshop CS6
If a 7D2 comes out with AF equal to the 5DMk3, I will buy one.
If a 7D2 comes out with AF equal to the 5DMk3, I will buy one.
Upvote
0
dlleno said:That said we should note that some have never had the need or desire to shoot handheld 28mm f/2.8 at 1/6th second.
KyleSTL said:dlleno said:That said we should note that some have never had the need or desire to shoot handheld 28mm f/2.8 at 1/6th second.
What about:
Waterfall photographs without tripod
Cityscape night shots with crowd movement (again, without tripod)
Longer panning shots
There is value in handholding exposures > 1/10 sec, even if some people refuse to believe it. Brian Carnathan (the-digital-picture.com) has a 1 sec handheld exposure with the 15-85mm IS on his review (including a 100% crop), you can't tell me the stabilization didn't have a significant role in creating that image.
Also useful for interior shots inside castles, churches, temples,museums etc. where tripod is not allowed.dlleno said:KyleSTL said:dlleno said:That said we should note that some have never had the need or desire to shoot handheld 28mm f/2.8 at 1/6th second.
What about:
Waterfall photographs without tripod
Cityscape night shots with crowd movement (again, without tripod)
Longer panning shots
There is value in handholding exposures > 1/10 sec, even if some people refuse to believe it. Brian Carnathan (the-digital-picture.com) has a 1 sec handheld exposure with the 15-85mm IS on his review (including a 100% crop), you can't tell me the stabilization didn't have a significant role in creating that image.
exactly right -- that was my point as well. those who reject the value of IS just don't have the need or desire to shoot these situations, it seems.
Rocky said:Also useful for interior shots inside castles, churches, temples,museums etc. where tripod is not allowed.dlleno said:KyleSTL said:dlleno said:That said we should note that some have never had the need or desire to shoot handheld 28mm f/2.8 at 1/6th second.
What about:
Waterfall photographs without tripod
Cityscape night shots with crowd movement (again, without tripod)
Longer panning shots
There is value in handholding exposures > 1/10 sec, even if some people refuse to believe it. Brian Carnathan (the-digital-picture.com) has a 1 sec handheld exposure with the 15-85mm IS on his review (including a 100% crop), you can't tell me the stabilization didn't have a significant role in creating that image.
exactly right -- that was my point as well. those who reject the value of IS just don't have the need or desire to shoot these situations, it seems.
wickidwombat said:also very usefull when you are standing on a vibrating platform trying to shoot in low light
briansquibb said:wickidwombat said:also very usefull when you are standing on a vibrating platform trying to shoot in low light
Make sure the lens is weatherproof if you are going to take pics on the waterbed
samirachiko said:The canon entry level full frame will be 6D! It makes no sense call it 7D MK2! the xD comeback to FF; the XXD will be top of aps-c!
My hope is: entry level full frame with swivel screen + 24-105L= 2000 Euro! ;D
daniemare said:I think PRO = xD regardless of sensor size. From marketing point this makes more sense.
Prosumer & Consumer = mirrorless, xxxxD, xxxD or xxD. Again regardless of sensor size.
briansquibb said:daniemare said:I think PRO = xD regardless of sensor size. From marketing point this makes more sense.
Prosumer & Consumer = mirrorless, xxxxD, xxxD or xxD. Again regardless of sensor size.
That is a fair way of doing it, however that would mean
- 7D would have to be renamed
- 5DII would have to be renamed
- 5DIII might have to be renamed
and I dont think that will happen
Traditionally the only pro cameras have been the 1 series
The single digits have been the semi pro
The double digits have been the 'enthusiasts'
The triple digits for the 'hobbyists'
The 4 digits the entry level
briansquibb said:daniemare said:I think PRO = xD regardless of sensor size. From marketing point this makes more sense.
Prosumer & Consumer = mirrorless, xxxxD, xxxD or xxD. Again regardless of sensor size.
That is a fair way of doing it, however that would mean
- 7D would have to be renamed
- 5DII would have to be renamed
- 5DIII might have to be renamed
and I dont think that will happen
Traditionally the only pro cameras have been the 1 series
The single digits have been the semi pro
The double digits have been the 'enthusiasts'
The triple digits for the 'hobbyists'
The 4 digits the entry level
daniemare said:briansquibb said:daniemare said:I think PRO = xD regardless of sensor size. From marketing point this makes more sense.
Prosumer & Consumer = mirrorless, xxxxD, xxxD or xxD. Again regardless of sensor size.
That is a fair way of doing it, however that would mean
- 7D would have to be renamed
- 5DII would have to be renamed
- 5DIII might have to be renamed
and I dont think that will happen
Traditionally the only pro cameras have been the 1 series
The single digits have been the semi pro
The double digits have been the 'enthusiasts'
The triple digits for the 'hobbyists'
The 4 digits the entry level
By Pro I mean anyone that earns a fair bit of money from their photography. Be it full time (pro) or part time (semi-pro). Also, Pro can also refer to ruggedness and overall ability.
From where I am sitting, the 5D is for sure a Pro camera. I think it is safe to make an accurate (yet unsientific) conclusion that most Canon wedding shooters use that cam - thus it is Pro. And from what I am reading, a lot of sport guys are using the 7D.
For me, there is a distinct difference between Pro and Flagship. The Flagship cam will probably be Pro, but not all Pro cams will be flagship.