infared said:CanonFanBoy said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
Hey! I'm the only fanboi around here!
Um...you look like a fangoil?
And you look like a camera. ;D
Upvote
0
infared said:CanonFanBoy said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
Hey! I'm the only fanboi around here!
Um...you look like a fangoil?
privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
CanonFanBoy said:infared said:CanonFanBoy said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
Hey! I'm the only fanboi around here!
Um...you look like a fangoil?
And you look like a camera. ;D
Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!!![]()
infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!!![]()
Etienne said:And never forget, permanent faith in Canon is based on evidence because ... no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed ! :![]()
Etienne said:faith in Canon is based on evidence
If you can predict when large companies are set to fail you can make serious bank in the stock market; maybe you should try that.no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed !
Orangutan said:Etienne said:faith in Canon is based on evidence
Faith is belief that contradicts evidence. I have no faith in Canon. I've only stated that they have a history of finding a way to stay competitive. That's not faith, that's history. Will they continue? We'll see.
If you can predict when large companies are set to fail you can make serious bank in the stock market; maybe you should try that.no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed !
Etienne said:And never forget, permanent faith in Canon is based on evidence because ... no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed ! :![]()
neuroanatomist said:infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!!![]()
Come back when people start buying bare silicon sensors, at that point your comment might be relevant.
![]()
Until then, don't stand downwind.
Orangutan said:Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Please read more carefully.
Jack Douglas said:Orangutan said:Etienne said:Sony is innovating at a blazing pace. Canon has been much more conservative.
Translation: Sony is burning R&D money fast, and still can't figure out how to make a consistently profitable product line, as Canon has.
To reiterate yet again, while I would be happy to see improved sensor tech in Canon products, the market does not yet appear to demand it.
I read CR for the humour or is it humor.
Jack
neuroanatomist said:infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!!![]()
Come back when people start buying bare silicon sensors, at that point your comment might be relevant.
![]()
Until then, don't stand downwind.
infared said:Orangutan said:Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.infared said:privatebydesign said:infared said:Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.
And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.
Utterly pointless............
Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Please read more carefully.
Who appointed you the forum police?
I will post what I want to say on this sensor thread.
Do you have control issues? LOL!
Please read what I just posted.
(Did I mention that the Sony and Nikon sensors are better than the Canon sensor right now?)
infared said:Your donut does not change the facts.