Patent: A Few More Image Sensor Patents from Canon

privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!! :P
 
Upvote 0
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.

Please read more carefully.
 
Upvote 0
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!! :P

Come back when people start buying bare silicon sensors, at that point your comment might be relevant.

marketshare.jpg


Until then, don't stand downwind.
 
Upvote 0
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!! :P

For now. Today. Canon will surpass them, then they will surpass Canon. Then Canon will beat them again. On and on it will go.

I'm too busy learning my Canon cameras to be concerned with that though. If I ever master them... then maybe I'll waste my time salivating at the grass on the other side of the fence (Or if I win the PowerBall lottery).
 
Upvote 0
Etienne said:
And never forget, permanent faith in Canon is based on evidence because ... no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed ! ::)

Nobody is saying it can't happen some day. It's just the problem is, is that it's not even starting to happen. In fact, just the opposite. The only possible conclusion is, or ok ONE conclusion, is that the market doesn't give a crap at all about more DR at low ISO. I know that it's hard to accept that as Sonikon increases DR at low ISO Canon's market share keeps increasing. Maybe they care more about AF, lenses, speedlites, and service. Maybe they just want something, a system, that works. Hard to explain I know.
 
Upvote 0
Etienne said:
faith in Canon is based on evidence

Faith is belief that contradicts evidence. I have no faith in Canon. I've only stated that they have a history of finding a way to stay competitive. That's not faith, that's history. Will they continue? We'll see.

no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed !
If you can predict when large companies are set to fail you can make serious bank in the stock market; maybe you should try that.
 
Upvote 0
Orangutan said:
Etienne said:
faith in Canon is based on evidence

Faith is belief that contradicts evidence. I have no faith in Canon. I've only stated that they have a history of finding a way to stay competitive. That's not faith, that's history. Will they continue? We'll see.

no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed !
If you can predict when large companies are set to fail you can make serious bank in the stock market; maybe you should try that.

Come on! It's been "going to happen" since 2009. Any day now it'll happen. I can feel it...
 
Upvote 0
Etienne said:
And never forget, permanent faith in Canon is based on evidence because ... no giant, market-leading company has ever lost their lead or failed ! ::)

Who (besides you, that is) is discussing 'permanent faith'? Today, Canon is the clear market leader – by a wide margin, and they've led the market for >11 years. Those facts are completely incongruent with the suggestion that Canon must 'make a big leap forward' in FF sensors, with an implied 'or else'.

Their nearest competitor is losing ground, and for all the forum DRoning about Sony's awesomagical sensors, in the camera market (you know...the things people buy), 3rd place Sony has 'eroded' less than 3% of Canon's 30% lead in market share - not even a meaningful change.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!! :P

Come back when people start buying bare silicon sensors, at that point your comment might be relevant.

marketshare.jpg


Until then, don't stand downwind.

Your donut does not change the facts.
 
Upvote 0
Orangutan said:
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.

Please read more carefully.

Who appointed you the forum police?
I will post what I want to say on this sensor thread.
Do you have control issues? LOL!
Please read what I just posted.
(Did I mention that the Sony and Nikon sensors are better than the Canon sensor right now?)
 
Upvote 0
Jack Douglas said:
Orangutan said:
Etienne said:
Sony is innovating at a blazing pace. Canon has been much more conservative.

Translation: Sony is burning R&D money fast, and still can't figure out how to make a consistently profitable product line, as Canon has.

To reiterate yet again, while I would be happy to see improved sensor tech in Canon products, the market does not yet appear to demand it.

I read CR for the humour or is it humor.

Jack

Jack...it HYSTERICAL!!!!!!!!! :-X
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Fandoig all you want... Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Feel free to lift your leg and pee into the wind some more!!! :P

Come back when people start buying bare silicon sensors, at that point your comment might be relevant.

marketshare.jpg


Until then, don't stand downwind.

nice foto ... from where did you get this one?

edit: i see manipulation here :)
look at O or D ...
 
Upvote 0
infared said:
Orangutan said:
infared said:
privatebydesign said:
infared said:
Canon fanboisism is very amusing. LOL!
It's just a camera system, boys.

And then you are accused of "fanboisism" [sic] if you try to point out factual errors in a rational manner.

Utterly pointless............

Nikon and Sony have better sensors.
Has anyone in this thread said any different? The discussion (of this thread, anyhow) is whether the Sonikon sensors are better enough at low ISO to force Canon to make a "big leap forward in performance" for upcoming bodies.

Please read more carefully.

Who appointed you the forum police?
I will post what I want to say on this sensor thread.
Do you have control issues? LOL!
Please read what I just posted.
(Did I mention that the Sony and Nikon sensors are better than the Canon sensor right now?)

That was...weak. I was expecting a better response. Would you like to try again?
 
Upvote 0