• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Patent: Canon 2mm f/1.4 Lens for Small Sensors

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,874
5,707
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<p>A patent for a 2mm f/1.4 lens from Canon has appeared. This type of lens would be for a small sensor device such as a compact video camera or action camera.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/canon2mmpatent.jpg"><img class="aligncenter wp-image-17610 size-full" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/canon2mmpatent.jpg" alt="canon2mmpatent" width="368" height="443" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2014-197128 (Google Translated)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Published  Date 2014.10.16</li>
<li>Filing date 2013.3.29</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Focal length f = 2.03mm</li>
<li>Fno. 1.44mm</li>
<li>Half angle ω = 59.18 °</li>
<li>Image height 3.00mm</li>
<li>The overall length of the lens 32.17mm</li>
<li>BF 0.51mm</li>
<li>Canon patents</li>
<li>Focus position of the periphery of the screen is shifted If you install the dome cover</li>
<li>And suppress the deviation of the focus by changing the air space of the lens in accordance with the presence or absence of the dome cover</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2014-10-17" target="_blank">EG</a>]</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
 
Pag said:
I wonder how wide a (very improbable) full frame 2 mm lens would be...
I cant even imagine. This is what a 6mm lens looks like...a 2 mm lens would probably have to warp back over the camera body

nikkor_6mm_f28_fisheye_image.jpg
 
Upvote 0
This looks like a rectilinear lens. A 2.03mm lens on a 1/3" (iPhone sensor size) 7.21x crop sensor frames like a 14.64mm lens on FF. If the projection of typical canon fisheyes is anything to go by, ~15mm gives a 180' FoV across the diagonal. A 14.64mm distortion free rectilinear lens would give a 112' FoV - remarkably close to the 59.18' half angle quoted in the patent.
 
Upvote 0
preppyak said:
Pag said:
I wonder how wide a (very improbable) full frame 2 mm lens would be...
I cant even imagine. This is what a 6mm lens looks like...a 2 mm lens would probably have to warp back over the camera body

nikkor_6mm_f28_fisheye_image.jpg

The 6mm lens is a circular fisheye, and for that focal length has to look backwards.

A rectilinear lens can't have an angle of view wider than 180mm, so it couldn't possibly look back.
 
Upvote 0
Antono Refa said:
preppyak said:
Pag said:
I wonder how wide a (very improbable) full frame 2 mm lens would be...
I cant even imagine. This is what a 6mm lens looks like...a 2 mm lens would probably have to warp back over the camera body

nikkor_6mm_f28_fisheye_image.jpg

The 6mm lens is a circular fisheye, and for that focal length has to look backwards.

A rectilinear lens can't have an angle of view wider than 180mm, so it couldn't possibly look back.

This is the post-Einsteinian 21st Century - I demand greater physics! I reckon there's a visual equivalent to the Sonic Boom to be discovered, if only we can shave a few more millimetres offa' these UWA lenses...
 
Upvote 0