The Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L IS USM II has been officially discontinued

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,810
3,185
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Canon continues to discontinue many EF lenses as they move everything over to the RF mount. The latest lens to be discontinued is the Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L USM II. We are hoping that this tells us that Canon will be announcing fast and wide RF L prime lenses in the near future. The Canon

See full article...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,810
3,185
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
It is fairly annoying that Canon discontinues EF lenses before introducing the RF counterparts.
Even I can no longer make excuses for the missing wide-angle L primes for the RF mount. It's a bit silly at this point.

If it's related to world events, it's time to release a roadmap of some kind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
Upvote 0

ashmadux

Art Director, Visual Artist, Freelance Photography
Jul 28, 2011
578
145
New Yawk
photography.ashworld.com
Even I can no longer make excuses for the missing wide-angle L primes for the RF mount. It's a bit silly at this point.

If it's related to world events, it's time to release a roadmap of some kind.

Yet no one asks about the 50 1.4? Cmon guys....please?

I'll keep mentioning it until it manifests itself. It is utterly ridiculous how canon refuses to make this lens. AFAIC, both of thier current RF50 offering can go chuck themselves - one too cheap, one to massive + expensive. And no one seems to care about this crazy hole in canons lineup. And there is no data anywhere saying it might be addressed.

Maybe its PTSD from the junky RF 85 f2 with its embarrassing external focusing?. (n) Or the misbegotten RF 35 macro. (n) Or anything else non-L RF that is either optically lazy or are just plain boring.

PS- at least no one has it as bad as RF-S. What an epic disaster of lens choices. (n) Even the EOS M has choices + 3rd party options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
Sep 20, 2020
3,106
2,424
And no one seems to care about this crazy hole in canons lineup.
There are a bunch of holes in the Canon lens lineup.
Canon pretty much has expensive L lenses and cheap non-L lenses.
EF lenses used the fill the middle until most were discontinued.
At least the EF 50 f/1.2 has not been discontinued.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

ashmadux

Art Director, Visual Artist, Freelance Photography
Jul 28, 2011
578
145
New Yawk
photography.ashworld.com
There are a bunch of holes in the Canon lens lineup.
Canon pretty much has expensive L lenses and cheap non-L lenses.
EF lenses used the fill the middle until most were discontinued.
At least the EF 50 f/1.2 has not been discontinued.

Even with that reality, there is many many defenders of lack of 3rd party options.

IMHOH, The tamron 30-150 2.8 is the poster-child of what canon uses are missing out on.
I wish i could at least have the option of using one. (critic says: you can, buy another camera lol) :cautious:

And the backup rationale- "well, just use EF"...well, newer 3rd party lenses are not being released for EF. So there's that :cautious:

Im getting an R62, but my stable of EF lens are saving me. I dont plan on getting a single RF lens. It would have to be an L, and those are jus too expensive to consider. If i won lotto or a fellowship or something, i would get the f2 zoom though. At least it's a unique lens worth the investment.
 
Upvote 0

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
CR Pro
Nov 7, 2013
5,686
8,578
Germany
Yet no one asks about the 50 1.4? Cmon guys....please?
I suppose that almost everyone did understand that with no EF 50/1.4 II for decades and with the RF 50 STM and the RF 50/1.2 L there won't be an RF 50/1.4 - at least for a long, long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Jul 21, 2010
31,163
12,990
Even I can no longer make excuses for the missing wide-angle L primes for the RF mount. It's a bit silly at this point.

If it's related to world events, it's time to release a roadmap of some kind.
No doubt Canon knows how many wide-angle L and non-L primes they sold in the EF mount, how many UWA zooms they sold and who bought them. They also know who is buying R bodies.

They have released three tiers of UWA zooms, and three non-L wide/UW primes. I suspect the fact that we haven’t seen any wide L primes in RF mount is not ‘silly’ but rather reflects their prioritization based on EF lens sales and the relevant RF buyer demographics.

Often, someone else’s decision seems silly or foolish to us because we would have made a different decision. In this case, Canon has data we don’t. That doesn’t necessarily mean demand isn’t there, since Canon’s goal is to make profit not to make us happy. They could be holding off to let demand build to the point where an exorbitantly-priced offering is still able to sell well, for example.

Side note: would it be a good thing for a Canon rumors site if Canon were to tell the world exactly what lenses will be released and when? :censored:
 

Bob Howland

CR Pro
Mar 25, 2012
917
588
Even I can no longer make excuses for the missing wide-angle L primes for the RF mount. It's a bit silly at this point.

If it's related to world events, it's time to release a roadmap of some kind.
At the risk of repeating myself, a lens roadmap would be great for the buyers, but how does it help the seller?

Update: When I bought my high speed primes, I was photographing music groups with a 5D. Typical exposure was 1/60, f/1.4, ISO3200. My 5D3 makes excellent images at ISO12800, which means I could now be using a 24-70 f/2.8 and a 70-200 f/2.8. That's progress.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

EOS

EOS
Apr 29, 2022
30
29
And this is why I bought the A7IV and the 24mm f/1.4 GM (and 20mm f/1.8 G). Weird menu system be dammed.

Their 14mm and 35mm GM glass is also great, but I’m currently planning on using that money towards a R6 Mark II.

We’ll see whether Canon ever pull their collective heads out and announce/ship fast wide L primes, but I no longer need to hold my breath waiting.
 
Upvote 0

entoman

wildlife photography
May 8, 2015
1,998
2,438
UK
And this is why I bought the A7IV and the 24mm f/1.4 GM (and 20mm f/1.8 G). Weird menu system be dammed.

Their 14mm and 35mm GM glass is also great, but I’m currently planning on using that money towards a R6 Mark II.

We’ll see whether Canon ever pull their collective heads out and announce/ship fast wide L primes, but I no longer need to hold my breath waiting.
I can understand that decision, but I think most of us simply prefer to settle on having one system, rather than 2 or more. Not just for financial reasons, but also to eliminate or minimise differences in ergonomics, colour science etc.

Unfortunately, those of us who have chosen to settle with Canon, have to accept the fact that Canon can't and won't launch every lens that we want quite yet.

We also have to reluctantly accept the fact that neither Sigma or Tamron, for whatever reason, are going to launch the "gap-filling" or "cheap but wonderful" lenses that we desire, in the foreseeable future.

So we'll just continue to come hear and moan... :cry:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

rbr

Sep 11, 2010
129
64
Fortunately Sigma's wonderful wide angle ART lenses are still available in EF mount and they work perfectly on my R5 with adapters including the very useful one that takes drop in filters. I couldn't care less whether or not Canon comes out with any wide angle primes. If I ever buy any Canon RF wide angles it would be something like the 15-30 STM to take on bike rides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Yet no one asks about the 50 1.4? Cmon guys....please?

I'll keep mentioning it until it manifests itself. It is utterly ridiculous how canon refuses to make this lens. AFAIC, both of thier current RF50 offering can go chuck themselves - one too cheap, one to massive + expensive. And no one seems to care about this crazy hole in canons lineup. And there is no data anywhere saying it might be addressed.

Maybe its PTSD from the junky RF 85 f2 with its embarrassing external focusing?. (n) Or the misbegotten RF 35 macro. (n) Or anything else non-L RF that is either optically lazy or are just plain boring.

PS- at least no one has it as bad as RF-S. What an epic disaster of lens choices. (n) Even the EOS M has choices + 3rd party options.
I'm sorry that you are not having a good day :)
I sold my Canon EF50/1.4 as it wasn't great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

NKD

Nov 26, 2018
30
13
Wonder what the price will be. My EF 35L Mk II is ok for me and in the Ultra-Wide range i use the EF 16-35/4L IS.
Greetings from sunny Frankfurt am Main, not far away from Wetzlar! - Andreas

Its odd to think that EF glass has gone up in value..on paper. Especially Tilt shift lenses.

My 16-35 f4 was $1,240 new in 2017. 2022 it now retails for $1899 (Australia).
The equivlent RF is $2669 - Around a 40% increase in price from EF to RF in this instance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Jan 27, 2020
826
1,796
It is fairly annoying that Canon discontinues EF lenses before introducing the RF counterparts.
Well, I doubt people who actually are going to buy the lens are too annoyed right now since it is:

IN STOCK at the Canon store
IN STOCK at Adorama
IN STOCK at B&H
IN STOCK at Best Buy
IN STOCK at Amazon USA
IN STOCK at Samy's.
...etc, etc, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0