Re: There Will Be a New EOS M Camera Coming in 2016
No DPAF, no touchscreen => no interest from me
No DPAF, no touchscreen => no interest from me
Upvote
0
Canon, please stop releasing products that cannot compete in the market. Existing M series line-up cannot match what sony a6300 or Fuji X-T2/T10 can deliver. Don't waste your time in undermarket productsCanon Rumors said:Lost in the madness that is all the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/confirmation-of-upcoming-product-announcements/">new products over the next couple of weeks</a> is the EOS M. There will not be any EOS M announcements for Photokina, which I think is totally understandable. Nothing in the Canon lineup brings about as much hype as a new EOS 5D body.</p>
<p>The good news is that we will see a new EOS M camera and a lens announced in 2016. I suspect we’ll see it before CES 2017 which starts on January 5, 2017 in Las Vegas.</p>
<p><strong>What we know about the coming EOS M:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>It will be a replacement to the EOS M3, but it won’t be called “M4”. Say hello to the M5.</li>
<li>It will go slightly up market from the EOS M3.</li>
<li>Don’t expect big ergonomic changes.</li>
<li>It will be APS-C.</li>
<li>A new lens will be announced alongside it, an EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS is a good bet.</li>
<li>We cannot confirm DPAF or 4K.</li>
</ul>
<p>That’s all for now, but expect to hear some more over the coming weeks.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
ahsanford said:H. Jones said:I would say the M3 chassis is basically the ideal mirrorless chassis for me. Tried one out at BH Photo, and although I could use a slightly bigger grip, it's extremely comfortable and usable for a camera of that size. I would totally be all-in if they released a full-frame M3 with the Canon DSLR software instead of being like a powershot. I would really love a mirrorless 35mm f/2 or f/1.4 on that. I wouldn't even buy any other lenses for it.
+1 (with a qualifier)
If you only need one lens -- why have a modular mount at all?
I say that because I've been arguing that Canon needs a 'batting practice' fixed lens FF mirrorless rig that lets them nail form factor / ergonomics / controls / EVF / etc. before they make the major EF-(FF Mirrorless) un-undoable decisions. Follow the path of Leica Q (28mm f/1.7) or Sony RX1 platform (35mm f/2) but with 'Canon know-how', grip, feel, menus, intuitiveness, etc.
Further, going fixed lens unlocks some sweet options: bury the lens in the mount (as it were) to save overall thickness of the rig + lens, and you can drop a leaf shutter in there for a crazy 1/2000 sync speed like Sony did.
- A
Hjalmarg1 said:Canon, please stop releasing products that cannot compete in the market.
Hjalmarg1 said:Canon, please stop releasing products that cannot compete in the portion of the market that I care about. Existing M series line-up cannot match what sony a6300 or Fuji X-T2/T10 can deliver. Don't waste your time in undermarket products that I have no interest in buying.
rrcphoto said:canon can't hear you after taking mirrorless third overall in domestic marketshare over panasonic, and over shipping enough M3 and M10's into Asia to have a nearly a 60% marketshare in ILC's for the second quarter this year.
ahsanford said:cnardo said:From my vantage point, I rather have a new SL2 than a M5... The SL2 feels better in my hands and easier to operate.
Anybody out there agree? Does anyone know when we can expect a SL2? Was suppose to be this year. ???
Just curious with your SL1 vs. EOS M -- how much of that "better/easier" is due to:
- An OVF's responsiveness
- A chunkier grip
- Rebel like controls and menus
In other words, the SL1 has a ton of 'SLR familiarity' going for it over the EOS M. What's the biggest of those three things you miss when using the EOS M?
- A
Woody said:rrcphoto said:canon can't hear you after taking mirrorless third overall in domestic marketshare over panasonic, and over shipping enough M3 and M10's into Asia to have a nearly a 60% marketshare in ILC's for the second quarter this year.
Do you have a link for this? Thanks
aa_angus said:Pardon me if this has already been answered, by why don't Canon make a proper mirrorless body? Like others, i would love to have a canon mirrorless as a backup to my 5D..but there is no option available. Why can't they manufacture a real competing mirrorless camera?
...
AvTvM said:aa_angus said:Pardon me if this has already been answered, by why don't Canon make a proper mirrorless body? Like others, i would love to have a canon mirrorless as a backup to my 5D..but there is no option available. Why can't they manufacture a real competing mirrorless camera?
...
sorry mate, but "you are the ONLY ONE who wants a full-featured, compact mirrorless camera ... so Canon will NOT build one for you" ... or so the CanonFanBoy-Neuroconomists say. :
aa_angus said:Pardon me if this has already been answered, by why don't Canon make a proper mirrorless body? Like others, i would love to have a canon mirrorless as a backup to my 5D..but there is no option available. Why can't they manufacture a real competing mirrorless camera? Having a 6d(2) as a backup is just so boring when you already shoot with a 5.
rrcphoto said:The math is here.
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=30513.0
Totally agree but I have lost hope in there being a SL2.cnardo said:From my vantage point, I rather have a new SL2 than a M5... The SL2 feels better in my hands and easier to operate.
Anybody out there agree? Does anyone know when we can expect a SL2? Was suppose to be this year. ???
aa_angus said:You wouldn't be tempted by a fully featured, full frame canon mirrorless?
mustafa said:Queue the Canon economics experts who can explain why it all made perfect financial sense.
ahsanford said:Hjalmarg1 said:Canon, please stop releasing products that cannot compete in the portion of the market that I care about. Existing M series line-up cannot match what sony a6300 or Fuji X-T2/T10 can deliver. Don't waste your time in undermarket products that I have no interest in buying.
There you go. Now you're good.
But I think you know where I'm going with this. In the mirrorless market, Canon cares less about having the most responsive, best handling, slickest feature set, fastest AF, (any) integral EVF, etc. because they'd rather dominate the low end of the market right now. And can you blame them? That's where the unit sales are.
- A
AvTvM said:"slightly upmarket" ... lol
stupid, Canon!
what's needed is so simple, it almost hutts: stick those 80D innards from DP-AF sensor to LP-E6N battery to full EOS firmware plus the G5X viewfinder into an M3-sized body with just a bit chunkier grip, sell it for $/€ 999, lean bak and watch as sales if EF-M lenses go through the roof and pop open vhampagne bottles every subsequent quarter, when CIPA nunbers show how Fuji and Sony APS-C sales wither away.
economics are simple. give customers the products they want and rake in the cash.